¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.23, no.5, 2000³â, pp.377-382
À¯·´³Êµµ¹ã³ª¹« ±º¶ô°ú µ¶Àϰ¡¹®ºñ Á¶¸²ÁöÀÇ »ýÅÂÆ¯¼º ºñ±³
( Ecological Characteristics of Picea abies Plantation in Comparison with Fagus sylvatica Population )
ÀÌ¿µ±Ù;Á¶ÇöÁ¦; ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;´ë±¸»ê¾÷Á¤º¸´ëÇÐ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
µ¶Àϰ¡¹®ºñ Á¶¸²Áö¸¦ ½Ä¹°»çȸÇÐÀû ½Ä»ýÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÇÏ¿© À̰÷ÀÇ ¿ø½Ä»ýÀÎ À¯·´³Êµµ¹ã³ª¹«±º¶ô°úÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ ÅëÇØ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶, Á¾Á¶¼º, »ýŰè, »ýȰÇüÀÇ Â÷ÀÌÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù µ¶Àϰ¡¹®ºñ Á¶¸²Áö¿¡¼­ÀÇ Æò±ÕÃâÇö Á¾¼ö´Â 13Á¾À̾úÀ¸¸ç, À̵é Á¾Àº »ýÅÂÀû ºÐÆ÷Ư¼º¿¡ µû¶ó À¯·´³Êµµ¹ã³ª¹«¸²¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â Á¾, ÀÚ¿¬ ħ¿±¼ö¸²¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â Á¾, ±×¸®°í °³¹ú ÈÄÀÇ ³ªÁö¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â Á¾ µî Å©°Ô ¼¼°¡Áö ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. Luzulo-Fagetum±º¶ô¿¡¼­´Â Luzula luzuloides°¡ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À̳ª µ¶Àϰ¡¹®ºñ Á¶¸²Áö¿¡¼­´Â Avenella flexuosa°¡ ¿ìÁ¡Çϰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Á¶¸²Áö ³»ÀÇ Ãʺ»½Ä¹°À» EllenbergÀÇ ÁöÇ¥Á¾¿¡ µû¶ó ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, È£±¤¼º½Ä¹°°ú °­»ê¼º½Ä¹°ÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÇÑÆí »ýȰÇü ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­´Â ÁöÇ¥½Ä¹°, Áö»ó½Ä¹° ±×¸®°í ¹ÝÁöÁ߽ŰÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÁöÁ߽ŰÀº °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. À§ÀÇ °á°úµéÀº °ú°Å À¯·´³Êµµ¹ã³ª¹«±º¶ôÀÌ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ´ø Áö¿ª¿¡ Á¶¼ºµÈ µ¶Àϰ¡¹®ºñ Á¶¸²Áö°¡ »ýÅÂÇÐÀû ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤ÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù.
Picea abies plantation in Mt. Eifel, Germany was studied phytosociologically, with special reference to species composition, structure, ecology and dormancy form, comparing to those of Fagus sylvastica population that once dominated the P. abies plantation. Thirteen plant species appeared on average. According to their ecological distribution, they were classified into three groups, F sylvastica forests, natural coniferous forests and bare-land after clear-cutting. In Luzulo-Fagetum population, Luzula luzuloides was the dominated species while in P. abies plantation was dominated by Avenella flesuosa. In assessment of herbaceous plants by indicator species of Ellenberg, increasing number of shade-intolerant species and acid-tolerant species occurred. In analysis of plant dormancy form, species of Chamaephytes, Phanerophytes and Hemikryptophytes increased, while that of Geophytes decreased. As a result, we found P. abies plantation unstable in ecological aspects.
 
Ű¿öµå
µ¶Àϰ¡¹®ºñ;½Ä»ý;À¯·´³Êµµ¹ã³ª¹«;Á¶¸²Áö;Ecological distribution;Fagus sylvastica;Indicator species;Picea abies plantation;Plant dormancy form;Retrogressivesuccession;
 
The Korean Journal of Ecology / v.23, no.5, 2000³â, pp.377-382
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-0317
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200011921336381)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿