¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.8, no.3, 1985³â, pp.127-132
Plastochron ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Amaranthus retroflexus ¿Í Chenopodium album ÀÇ ÀÙÀÇ ¼ºÀå ÇØ¼® 2. ÀÙÀÇ °æÀïÀû ¹ß´Þ
( The Development of Leaf in Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album Represented by the Plastochron )
;; ;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
In this study, the competitive development of leaf in Amaranthus and Chenopodium were invesitgated by the complemented plastochron index. The value of PI for Amaranthus was not varied with competional ratios, while for Chenopodium it was varied. Namely in Chenopodium, the plastochron 1 was increased as competitional combinations, the plastochron 2 was decreased. These results indicated Amaranthus had advantage in competition over Chenopodium. It is surmised that these results were exhibited differences in photosynthetic pathway between Amaranthus (C4 plant) and Chenopodium (C3 plant). The linear patterns were clearly demonstrated by the differences in leaf arrangement between Amaranthus (alternate type) and Chenopodium (opposite type). From these resultss, use of plastochron seems to a useful means of evaluating plat response to various environments.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
The Korean Journal of Ecology / v.8, no.3, 1985³â, pp.127-132
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-0317
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198511919964766)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿