¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.28, no.5, 2005³â, pp.295-303
¹Ð¾î, Rhinogobius brunneus (Pisces: Gobiidae)ÀÇ ¼ºÀû ÀÌÇü ¹× ¼öÄÆÀÇ ÀÌÇü
( Sexual and Males Dimorphism of Rhinogobius brunneus (Pisces: Gobiidae) )
¼ÛÈ£º¹;¹éÇö¹Î;¼Õ¿µ¸ñ; °­¿ø´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;¼­¿ø´ëÇб³ »ç¹ü´ëÇÐ °úÇб³À°°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¹Ð¾îÀÇ ¼ºÀû ÀÌÇü°ú ¼öÄÆ »çÀÌÀÇ ÀÌÇü¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©, 2005³â 5¿ù¿¡ °­¿øµµ Ãáõ½Ã ¼­¸é ¿À¿ù¸®ÀÇ Áö¾Ïõ¿¡¼­ äÁýÇÑ °³Ã¼±ºÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. Female°ú maleLÀÇ Ã¼Àå ºÐÆ÷¿Í ¼ººñ´Â °ÅÀÇ À¯»çÇÏ¿´À¸³ª males´Â 40 mmÀÌÇÏÀÇ °³Ã¼µéÀÌ ´ëºÎºÐÀ¸·Î female°ú maleL¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¼ÒÇü °³Ã¼µéÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, maleL : maleSÀÇ ºñ´Â 1 : 0.46À̾ú´Ù. Female(N=79)°ú maleL(N=79)ÀÇ °èÃøÇüÁú Áß 18°³ ÇüÁú(SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, ED, HL, FDFL, SDFB, CFL, AFB, VFL, PFL, PFB)¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(P<0.05)°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À̵é Áß SNL, AHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFL, CFL, PFB µî 12°³ ÇüÁúÀº ÇöÀúÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(P<0.001)¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Female(N=36)°ú maleS(N=36)ÀÇ ºñ±³ °á°ú 8°³ ÇüÁú(SNL, ML, DL, MW, HL, CR, VFL, PFL)¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(P<0.05)°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À̵éÁß ML, DL, HL µî 3°³ÀÇ ÃøÁ¤ ÇüÁú¿¡¼­´Â ÇöÀúÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(P<0.001)°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Male(N=36)°ú maleS(N=36)ÀÇ ÃøÁ¤ ÇüÁú Áß SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFL µî ¸ðµÎ 11°³ ÇüÁú¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(P<0.05)°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 11°³ ÇüÁú Áß ML., DL, MW, AHW, HL, FDFL µî 6°³ ÇüÁúÀº Å« Â÷ÀÌ(P<0.001)°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
The sexual dimorphism and intra sexual dimorphism in males of Rhinogobius brunneus were investigated at Jiam stream, a tributary of the Bukhan river from May, 2005. The frequency distributions in standard length were similar for the females and maleLs, but maleSs were smaller than the females and maleLs. The ratio of MaleL (N=79) to males (N=79) was 1 : 0.46. The comparison between female (N=79) and maleL (N=79) gave significant differences (P<0.05) in 18 morphometric characteristics (SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, ED, HL, FDFL, SDFB, CFL, AFB, VFL, PFL, PFB) and 12 characteristics (SNL, AHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFI, CFL, PFB) (P<0.001). Eight morphometric characteristics (SNL, ML, DL, MW, HL, CFL, VFL, PFL) in female (N=36) and males (N=36) had significant differences (P<0.05) and three characteristics (ML, DL, HL) had very significant differences (P<0.001). Eleven characteristics (SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFL) were significantly different in maleL (N=36) and males (N=36) (P<0.05) and six (ML, DL, MW, AHW, HL, FDFL) were very significantly different (P<0.001).
 
Ű¿öµå
Intra sexual dimorphism;Rhinogobius brunneus;Secondary sexual character;Sexual dimorphism;
 
The Korean Journal of Ecology / v.28, no.5, 2005³â, pp.295-303
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-0317
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200509905769583)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿