¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.26, no.1, 2003³â, pp.5-12
¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ È¯°æÀûÀÀ·Â : Áß±Ý¼Ó ÃàÀû°ú Phenolic CompoundsÀÇ °ü°è
( Environmental Adaptability of Eupatorium rugosum : Relationship between Accumulation of Heavy Metals and Phenolic Compounds )
±è¿ë¿Á;¹ÚÁ¾¾ß;ÀÌÈ£ÁØ; ¹Ì±¹ ¿ö½ÌÅÏÁÖ¸³´ëÇб³;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ À̰ú´ëÇÐ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇкΠ»ý¸í°úÇÐÀü°ø;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ À̰ú´ëÇÐ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇкΠ»ý¸í°úÇÐÀü°ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ ÀÙ ÃßÃâ¾×À» ¹Ì±¹ÀÚ¸®°øÀ» ºñ·ÔÇÑ 5Á¾ÀÇ ½Ä¹°¿¡ ó¸®ÇÏ¿© Á¾ÀÚ¹ß¾Æ¿Í À¯½Ä¹°»ýÀåÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´°í, total phenolic compounds¿Í Áß±Ý¼Ó ÀÌ¿ÂÀ» ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÙ°ú Åä¾ç¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ ÀÙ ÃßÃâ¾×¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¹Ì±¹ÀÚ¸®°øÀÇ Ãʱâ»ýÀåÀº 10%¿Í 25%³óµµ¿¡¼­ ÃËÁøµÇ¾ú°í, Åä¾ç ÃßÃâ¾×ÀÇ total phenolic compounds´Â ÀÙ ÃßÃâ¾×ÀÇ total phenolic compound º¸´Ù ³·¾Ò´Ù. Åä¾çÀÇ total phenolic compounds´Â ´ëÁ¶±¸¿Í 10%, 25% ³óµµ·Î ó¸®µÈ Åä¾ç¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç ÀÚ¿¬»óÅ¿¡¼­ ÀÙ ÃßÃâ¾× 25%°¡ threshold ³óµµÀÓÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ total phenolic compounds´Â ½Å°¥³ª¹«¸² ÀÓ»ó¿¡¼­ 1.66 mg/1, ÀÓ¿¬¿¡¼­´Â 1.09 mg/l·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾úÀ¸¹Ç·Î »óºÎ½Ä»ý¿¡ µû¸¥ total phenolic compounds´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª, °¢ Åä¾ç¿¡¼­´Â »óºÎ½Ä»ý¿¡ µû¶ó total phenolic compounds°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª ¹°ÀÇ ÀÙ ÃßÃâ¾× 󸮽à ¾Ö±â¼ö¿µ°ú °­¾ÆÁöÇ®ÀÇ ¹ß¾ÆÀ²Àº 50% ÀÌ»óÀÇ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ ÇöÀúÈ÷ ¾ïÁ¦µÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, Â÷Ç®ÀÇ ¹ß¾ÆÀ²Àº ÃßÃâ¾×ÀÇ ³óµµ¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. À¯¹¦¿Í À¯±Ù»ýÀåÀº ±ÍÈ­Á¾ ±×·ìº¸´Ù ÀÚ»ýÁ¾ ±×·ìÀÌ 2¹è ÀÌ»ó ¾ïÁ¦µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ ÃßÃâ¾× ³óµµ 10%¿Í 25%°¡ ó¸®µÈ ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ Á¾ÀÚ¹ß¾Æ¿Í °ÇÁß·®Àº ´ëÁ¶±¸º¸´Ù ÃËÁøµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ phenolic compounds¸¦ HPLC·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú caffeic acid (460.9 mg/1), benzoic acid (109.7 mg/l), protocatechuic acid (7.3 mg/l), ¥ñ-hydroquinone (6.0 mg/l), cinnamic acid (2.7 mg/l), hydroquinone (0.23 mg/1) ¼øÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ºÐ¼®µÈ ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÇ phenolic compounds °¢°¢¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ì±¹ÀÚ¸®°øÀÇ ¹ß¾ÆÀ²Àº caffeic acid (460.9 mg/l)Ä¡ ³óµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»Áö¶óµµ À̰ÍÀÌ ³·Àº cinnamic acid¿Í protocatechuic acid¿¡¼­ ÇöÀúÇÑ ¾ïÁ¦Çö»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹° ÀÓ»óÀÇ Åä¾çº¸´Ù ¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°ÀÌ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â Åä¾çÀÇ Áß±Ý¼Ó ÇÔ·®ÀÌ Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ƯÈ÷ Al, Fe ¹× MnÀÇ ÇÔ·®ÀÌ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç À̵é Á߱ݼÓÀº total phenolic compound ÇÔ·®ÀÌ ³ôÀº ÀÙ¿¡ ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ ÃàÀûµÇ¾ú´Ù.
Seed germination rate and seedling growth were measured on 6 different species(Phytolacca americana, Eupatorium rugosum, Rumex acetocella, Echinochloa crusgalli, Cassia mimosoides var. nomame, Setaria viridis) treated with leaf extract of E. rugosum. Total phenolic compound and heavy metal were analyzed on leaf and soil with and without E. rugosum. The growth of P. americana seedlings were stimulated by 10% and 25% of E. rugosum water extract treatment. The content of total phenolic compounds in soil was lower than that of leaf extract, and 25% was confirmed as threshold concentration in natural systems because the total phenolic compounds were not significantly different between the control soils and the soil treated with 10%, and 25% extract. Total phenolic compound concentrations of the leaf extracts were highest (1.66 mg/l) with E. rugosum grown under the Quercus forest canopy and lowest (1.09 mg/l) for the plant grown in the mixed forest edge. Leaf extracts of plants selected in different sampling sites (Forest interior, Forest edge, under Pinus Canopy and Quercus Canopy) were significant, while soil extracts were not. Seed germination of R. acetocella and S. viridis were significantly inhibited at over 50% concentrations of E. rugosum, but C. mimosoides var. nomame was not affected at any concentration. The radicle and shoot growth of the native species group were reduced two times more than those of the exotic species group by the treatment of extracts. Especially, the seed germination percentage and dry weight of E. rugosum were greater than those of the control group by treatments with extracts of 10% and 25%. Analysis of aqueous extracts from E. rugosum by HPLC identified 6 phenolic compounds: caffeic acid (460.9 mg/l), benzoic acid (109.7 mg/l), protocatechuic acid (7.3 mg/l), ¥ñ-hydroquinone (6.0 mg/l), cinnamic acid (2.7 mg/l) and hydroquinone (0.23 mg/l). The seed germination of P. americana was also inhibited dramatically by protocatechuic acid and cinnamic acid even though the content of caffeic acid (460.9 mg/l) was the highest among analyzed phenolic compounds. The heavy metal content of soil without A. altissima was higher than that of soil with E. rugosum. Particularly, Al, Fe and Mn was considerably high and most of the heavy metal were accumulated in leaves where a high level of total phenolic compounds was found.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼­¾çµî°ñ³ª¹°;À¯½Ä¹°»ýÀå;Á¾Àڹ߾Æ;Á߱ݼÓ;total phenolic compounds;Eupatorium rugosum;Heavy metal;Seed germination;Seedling growth;Total phenolic compounds;
 
The Korean Journal of Ecology / v.26, no.1, 2003³â, pp.5-12
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-0317
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311922413823)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿