¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.28, no.4, 1995³â, pp.125-136
À¯ÇÑÂ÷ºÐ ¸ðÇü¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀÏÂ÷¿ø À̼Û-È®»ê¹æÁ¤½Ä °è»ê°á°úÀÇ ºñ±³
( Comparison of the Results of Finite Difference Method in One-Dimensional Advection-Dispersion Equation )
ÀÌÈñ¿µ;ÀÌÀçö; ½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;Çѱ¹ÅäÁö°³¹ß°ø»ç ÅäÁö¿¬±¸¿ø ±â¼ú°³¹ß½Ç, ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ °­»ç, ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ƯÁ¤°î¼±À» °í·ÁÇÑ ELMÀ» À̼Û-È®»ê¹æÁ¤½Ä¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ±× °á°ú¸¦ Eulerian ±â¹ý(Stone-Brian, QUICKEST)°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̼ÛÇ×ÀÇ °è»êÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â Lagrangian º¸°£¹ý°ú Cubic spline º¸°£¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´°í È®»êÇ×ÀÇ °è»ê¿¡ À־´Â Crank-Nicholson ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÄ¡¸ðÇüÀÇ Àû¿ë°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. (1) Gaussian hill¿¡ÀÇ Àû¿ë:Lagrangian º¸°£¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© °è»êÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ °¡Àå Á¤È®ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. Cubic spline º¸°£¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í QUICKEST ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Peclet¼ö°¡ 50ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡ °¨¼èÇö»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. Stone-Brian¹æ¹ýÀº Peclet¼ö 10,50¿¡¼­ À§»ó¿ÀÂ÷°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. (2) Advanced front¿¡ÀÇ Àû¿ë: ¸ðµç ¹æ¹ýÀÌ Peclet¼ö 1,4¿¡¼­ Á¤È®ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. Peclet¼ö°¡ 50ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡ Lagrangian º¸°£¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© °è»êÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í Stone-Brian ¹æ¹ýÀº ÁõÆø¿ÀÂ÷°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´°í Cubic spline º¸°£¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í QUICKEST ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â ¼öÄ¡Áøµ¿ Çö»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
ELM, a characteristic line based method, was applied to advection-dispersion equation, and the results obtained were compared with those of Eulerian schemes(Stone-Brian and QUICKEST). The calculation methods consisted of Lagrangian interpolation scheme and cubic spline interpolation scheme for the advection calculation, and the Crank-Nicholson scheme for the dispersion calculation. The results of numerical methods were as follows: (1) for Gaussian hill: ELM, using Lagrangian interpolation scheme, gave the most accurate computational result, ELM, using cubic spline interpolation scheme, and QUICKEST scheme gave numerical damping for Peclet number 50. Stone-Brian scheme gave phase shift introduced in the numerical solution for Peclet number 10 and 50. (2) for advanced front: All schemes gave accurate computational results for Peclet number 1 and 4. ELM, Lagrangian interpolation scheme, and Stone,Brian scheme gave dissipation error and ELM, using cubic spline interpolation scheme, and QUICKEST scheme gave numerical oscillation for Peclet number 50.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸÁö / v.28, no.4, 1995³â, pp.125-136
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-9488
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199511920095959)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿