¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.2, no.2, 2001³â, pp.68-80
´ëÇü°Ç¼³¾÷üÀÇ ÇØ¿Ü°Ç¼³°ø»ç Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À ¸®½ºÅ© °ü¸®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Corporate Portfolio Risk Management for Multinational Construction Company )
ÇѽÂÇå;ÀÌ¿µ;±èÇüÁø;¿ÁÁ¾È£; °Ç¼³±³ÅëºÎ ¼­±â°ü;´ë¿ì°Ç¼³ ÅõÀÚÀ¯Ä¡ÆÀ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ë °ÇÃà°øÇаú;±³À°ÀÎÀûÀÚ¿øºÎ ¼­±â°ü;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°Ç¼³½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼¼°èÈ­, ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¶´Þ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ºÎ°¢ ¹× Á¤º¸±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀü µî¿¡ µû¶ó ÇØ¿Ü°Ç¼³»ç¾÷À» °Ü³ÉÇÑ °Ç¼³¾÷üµéÀÇ ½ÃÀåÈ®´ë ¹× ¼öÀÍâÃâÀÇ ±âȸ°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ¹æ´ëÇÑ ·®ÀÇ °è¾à¹®¼­, Àå±âÀûÀÎ ÅõÀÚȸ¼ö±â°£ ¹× ÀÚ±ÝÁ¶´Þ µîÀÇ ºÎ´ã°ú ´õºÒ¾î ȯÀ², ÀÌÀÚÀ², ¹°°¡»ó½Â, ½Å¿ë µîÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇØ¿Ü°Ç¼³»ç¾÷ÀÇ ¸®½ºÅ© ¶ÇÇÑ ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ¾î À̵éÀ» »ç¾÷´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â Á¾ÇհǼ³¾÷ü¿¡°Ô´Â »ó±â ¸®½ºÅ©µé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ °ü¸®°¡ ¿ä±¸µÈ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´Ù¼öÀÇ ÇØ¿Ü°Ç¼³»ç¾÷À» ¼öÇàÇÏ´Â Á¾ÇհǼ³¾÷üÀÇ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ÃÖÀûÀÇ »ç¾÷Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À ¼±Á¤À» À§ÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤¸ðµ¨À» Á¦¾ÈÇÑ´Ù. ¿©±â¿¡´Â ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ·¹º§°ú ±â¾÷·¹º§ÀÇ ¸®½ºÅ©¸¦ ÅëÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ±â¾÷¼öÁØÀÇ ¸®½ºÅ© °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© °Ç¼³»ê¾÷¿¡ Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À ¹× VaR(Value at Risk) °³³äÀ» ¼Ò°³ÇÏ°í ±â¾÷ÀÇ Àü·«Àû ¸ñÀû¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ ´Ù±âÁØ(Multi-criteria)ÀÌ Á¦¾ÈµÈ´Ù. ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Á¤·®Àû ºÐ¼®°ú ´õºÒ¾î ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ÀÚÀÇ ¸®½ºÅ© ŵµ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Á¤¼ºÀû Æò°¡°¡ °¡´ÉÇϵµ·Ï ÇØ´ç °Ç¼³±â¾÷ÀÇ È¿¿ë°³³äÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¼öÁýµÈ ÇØ¿Ü°ø»ç ½ÇÀûÀڷḦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© »ó±â ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ ¹æ¹ý·Ð¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ËÁõÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
While opportunities for international construction firms have been growing with globalization, the risk of international construction projects is significantly increasing in severity and complexity. However, the traditional risk management approach in the construction industry has maintained a profit focus. In addition, this approach has not considered the overall risk at the corporate level, but rather has focused only on the risk of individuals at the project level. Corporate risk management should be implemented from the initial stages of new project selection. This paper suggests the Multi-criteria Integrated Systematic Analysis as a strategic decision-making tool for international construction contractors. The model integrates the multi-criteria of risk, return, and efficiency to choose the optimal set of new portfolios at the corporate level. This model also introduces the Value at Risk (VaR) concept to the international construction industry to present the total risk at the corporate level. To validate this model, this paper tested an experimental case study using the historical data of a global general contractor.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÇØ¿Ü°Ç¼³»ç¾÷;Àü»çÀû ¸®½ºÅ©°ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ;Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À;´Ù±âÁØ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¹ÇÕÀû ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤;International Construction Projects;Corporate Risk Management;Optimal Portfolio;VaR;Multi-criteria Integrated Systemtic Decision-making;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.2, no.2, 2001³â, pp.68-80
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200120828330286)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿