¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.29, no.5, 1996³â, pp.185-202
ÇÏõÀ¯ÁöÀ¯·® °áÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °³¹ß ¹× Àû¿ë: II. Àû¿ë ¹× °á°ú
( Development of a Method for Determining the Instream Flow and Its Application: II. Application and Result )
±è±ÔÈ£;±è¼±¹Ì; Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸½Ç;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸½Ç ¿¬±¸¿ø, Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸½Ç ¼±ÀÓ¿¬±¸¿ø, Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ±âȹÁ¶Á¤½Ç ½ÇÀå;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°³¹ßµÈ ÇÏõÀ¯ÁöÀ¯·® °áÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ±Ý°­À¯¿ª º»·ù ±¸°£(´ëû´ï Á¶Á¤Áö¿¡¼­ °­°æ±îÁö)¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç׸ñº° ÇÊ¿äÀ¯·®, ±×¸®°í 5°³±¸°£ ¹× ´ëÇ¥ÁöÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÏõÀ¯ÁöÀ¯·®°ú ÇÏõ°ü¸®À¯·®À» »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¥¼ö·®Àº Æò±Õ°¥¼ö·®À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î, QUAL2E ¸ðÇüÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ȯ°æ±âÃʻ缳 ¿Ïºñ¿©ºÎ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼öÁúÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇϰí, ¾î·ù´Â ±Ý°­À¯¿ªÀÇ 9°³ ´ëÇ¥¾îÁ¾¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÇÊ¿äÀ¯·®À» »êÁ¤ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÇÏõ°æ°üÀº °øÁÖ¿Í ºÎ¿© ÁöÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇØ, ¼ö¿îÀº ÀÚ¿¬ Çϵµ ¹æ½Ä, ¹°³îÀÌ´Â ÇöÀç¿Í Àå·¡¿¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁú ¿©°¡È°µ¿À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ±âŸ Ç׸ñÀº Æò°¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ´ëüÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÚ¿¬»óŸ¦ À¯ÁöÇϰí ÀÖ´Â »ó·ù ±¸°£Àº »ýÅÂ°è º¸Àü µî°ú °°Àº ÇÏõÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Àû ±â´É¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ À¯·®ÀÌ Áö¹èÀûÀ̰í, ÇÏ·ù´Â ¼öÁú ¾ÇÈ­¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼öÁú º¸Àü°ú ¼ö»óÀÌ¿ë µî°ú °°Àº ÀÎÀ§Àû ±â´É¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ À¯·®ÀÌ Áö¹èÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¸ñÇ¥ ³âµµ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼öÁúº¸Àü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÊ¿äÀ¯·®Àº ȯ°æ±âÃʽü³ ¿Ïºñ ¿©ºÎ¿¡ µû¶ó ÇÏõÀ¯ÁöÀ¯·®°ú ÇÏõ°ü¸®À¯·®ÀÌ Å« Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿© Çϼö󸮿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼öÁúº¸ÀüÀÌ ½Ã±ÞÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The newly-developed method for estimating the instream flow, proposed by the authors (1996), was applied to the main channel reach of the Kum River basin in Korea. Performance of the suggested method was tested through the evaluations of the required flow, instream flow, and river-management flow which were estimated at five main reaches with each representative station. The mean drought flow was used as the object flow to evaluate the minimum instream flow for the mid- and large-size rivers. Water quality prediction by using the QUAL2E model was made for both cases that the planned wastewater treatment facilities may and may not be constructed. The required flow for the fish habitat was evaluated for 9 representative fish species. The instream flows required for the riverine aesthetics at Kong-ju and Puyo scenary points, for river navigation at natural channel conditions, and for current and potential recreation activities were evaluated, respectively. The instream flows required for other items are not quantified. On the whole, it is shown that the instream flow to maintain the natural riverine functions such as fish habitat, and riverine aesthetics govern the upstream reaches of the Kum River, and the artificial riverine functions such as conservation of water quality, navigation and recreations govern the middle and downstream reaches. Especially, it is found that the instream flow requirement depends largely upon the construction of wastewater treatment facilities at the Kum River basin.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸÁö / v.29, no.5, 1996³â, pp.185-202
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-9488
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199611920097844)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿