¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.26, no.2, 1993³â, pp.67-77
ÇѰ­ÀÇ È«¼ö±Ô¸ð¿¡ µû¸¥ Àεµ±³¼öÀ§ÀÇ Á¶¼®¿µÇâºÐ¼®
( )
ÀÌÁ¾ÅÂ;ÇѰǿ¬;¼­º´ÇÏ; °æ±â´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú, Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸½Ç;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÇѰ­Çϱ¸ Á¶À§°¡ Àεµ±³ ÁöÁ¡ÀÇ È«¼öÀ§¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» NETWORK ¸ðÇü¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. '90³âÀÇ ¼¼ È«¼ö¿Í 2,000~20,000CMS °£ 8°³ÀÇ ±Ô¸ðº° °¡»óÈ«¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Á¶¼®¿µÇ⼺ºÐÀ» °è»êÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, È«¼ö·®ÀÌ Ä¿Áú¼ö·Ï Á¶¼®¿µÇâÀº °¨¼ÒµÊÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. È«¼ö·®ÀÌ 2,000CMS ÀÌÇÏÀÏ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Á¶¼®ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ¸·Î ¾à 50Cm ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¼öÀ§»ó½ÂÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, È«¼ö¿¹°æº¸ ±âÁØÈ«¼öÀ§ 4.5m (7,000CMS)¿¡¼­´Â ¾à 9cm¿¡ ºÒ°úÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÌ ÀÌ»óÀÇ È«¼ö±Ô¸ð¿¡¼­ Á¶¼® ¿µÇâÀº ¹«½ÃÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» Á¤µµ·Î ÀÛ°Ô °è»êµÇ¾ú´Ù.
The increased water level caused by tidal motion at Indokyo is analyzed by the NETWORK model. The tidal effect is studied for 3 real floods in 1990 and 8 classified hypothetical floods in which the peak discharges are in the range of 2, 000-20, 000CMS. The result of numerical simulation shows that the tidal effect is decreased as the flood is increased. The surged level is 50cm when the flood discharge is 2, 000CMS, showing that its effect is considerable. However it shows only 9cm when the discharge is 7, 000CMS which corresponds to 4.5cm of standard flood level of MOC. Therefore, so it may be possible to neglect the influence of the tidal fluctuation when the peak discharge of a flood is bigger than 7, 000CMS.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸÁö / v.26, no.2, 1993³â, pp.67-77
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-9488
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199311920094448)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿