¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.18, no.3, 1985³â, pp.253-264
Àú¼öÁöÀÇ Storage-Yield¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Storage-Yield Relationship of Reseroir )
À̼øÅ¹;ÀåÀμö; ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ;¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±Ùº»ÀûÀ¸·Î Àú¼öÁöÀÇ Storage-Yield °ü°è¸¦ ÇØ¼®ÇÏ´Â µ¥´Â µÎ°¡Áö °üÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. °¡Àå º¸ÆíÀûÀÎ °üÁ¡Àº ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¼ö¿ä·®À» °ø±ÞÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Àú¼öÁöÀÇ ÇÊ¿äÀú¼ö¿ë·®À» °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·± ÇüÅÂÀÇ ¹®Á¦´Â Àú¼öÁöÀÇ °èȹÀ̳ª Ãʱ⠼³°è´Ü°è¿¡¼­ º¸Åë »ý±ä´Ù. µÎ ¹øÂ° °üÁ¡Àº ÁÖ¾îÁø Àú¼ö¿ë·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹æ·ù·®ÀÇ °áÁ¤À̸ç, À̰ÍÀº ÃÖÁ¾ ¼³°è³ª ´õ »ó¼¼ÇÑ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ ÇöÁ¸ Àú¼öÁöÀÇ ÀçÆò°¡¿¡¼­ ÀÚÁÖ »ý±ä´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº Àú¼öÁöÀÇ ¼³°è³ª ¿î¿µÀ» À§ÇÑ Storage-Yield °ü°è¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ÇöÀçÀÇ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» °³¼±ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Àú¼öÁöÀÇ Storage-Yield °ü°è¸¦ ÇØ¼®ÇÏ´À s°¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÑ ±â¹ýÀ» ã±â À§ÇÏ¿© ÀÜÂ÷´©°¡°î¼±±â¹ý(Residual mass curve technique), °³¼±µÈ Àú·ù·®±â¹ý(Low flow technique)°ú TPM ±â¹ý(Transition probability matrix technique)ÀÌ °ËÅäµÇ¾ú´Ù. Àú¼öÁöÀÇ Storage-Yield °ü°è¸¦ ÇØ¼®Çϴµ¥ À־ ȫõ´ï °Ç¼³¿¹Á¤ÁöÁ¡ÀÇ 1917¡­1940³â ¿ùÀ¯ÀÔ·® ÀÚ·á¿Í Thomas-Fiering ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¸ðÀÇ ¹ß»ýµÈ ÀڷḦ °¡Áö°í À§ÀÇ ¼¼°¡Áö ±â¹ýÀ» »ó¼¼È÷ °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àú¼öÁöÀÇ Storage-Yield °ü°è¸¦ Æø³Ð°Ô °ËÅäÇÑ °á°ú, ÀÜÂ÷´©°¡°î¼±±â¹ý°ú Àú·ù·®±â¹ýÀº ¿¹ºñ ¼³°è¿¡ Ÿ´çÇϸç, TPM ±â¹ýÀº ¿ùº° ȤÀº °èÀýº° ¼ö¿äº¯µ¿À» °í·ÁÇÒ ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ÃÖÁ¾ ¼³°è¿¡ Ÿ´çÇÑ ±â¹ýÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
Basically, there are two ways viewing the reservoir storage-yield relationship., The most common viewpoint is the determination of the storage required at a given reservoir to supply a required yield. This type of problem is usually encountered in the planning and early design phases of a reservoir. The second viewpoint is the determination of yield from a given amount of storage. This often occurs in the final design phases or in re-evaluation of an existing reservoir for a more comprehensive analysis. The purpose of this study is to improve the present methodology estimating the storage-yield relationship for a reservoir design or a reservoir operation. The Residual Mass curve Technique, the slightly modified version of Low Flow Techniques and the Transition Probability Matrix Technique are reviewed and examined for the best fit technique to find the reservoir storage-yield realtionship. The historical data during 1917~1940 at the proposed Hongchun damsite and the synthetic data simulated by Thomas-Fiering model are utilized to examine the reservoir storge-yield relationship with three techniques in detail. After the three techniques which estimate the reservoir storage-yield relationship were reviewed extensively, it was concluded that the Residual Mass Curve Technique and the slightly modified version of Low Flow Techniques were suitable for a preliminary design, but the Transition Probability Matrix Technique Provided satisfactory results as a final design technique because it reflected the variation of a monthly yield as well as seasonlly.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.3, 1985³â, pp.253-264
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-9488
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198511920091360)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿