|
|
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.19, no.2, 1986³â, pp.157-166
|
¹Ì°èÃø ¼ÒÇÏõ¼ö°èÀÇ ÇÕ¼º´ÜÀ§µµ À¯µµ
( Derivation of the Synthetic Unit Hydrograph at Ungaged Small Watershed ) |
| ¾È»óÁø;À̾ïÇÑ; ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø(¼®»ç)Á¹;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ¹ÌÃøÃø ¼ÒÇÏõ À¯¿ª¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ ÇÕ¼º´ÜÀ§µµ¸¦ ã¾Æ³»±â À§ÇÏ¿© ´ëÇ¥À¯¿ªÀÇ °üÃøÀÚ·á·ÎºÎÅÍ °¢ ¼ÒÇÏõÀÇ ½ÇÃø´ÜÀ§µµ¸¦ À¯µµÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ÒÇÏõ À¯¿ªÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀÎÀÚ¿Í ´ÜÀ§µµÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÄ¡¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© Snyder, S.C.S, Nash, Clark¿¡¼ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â ½ÄÀ» À¯µµÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌµé ½ÄÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ´ëÇ¥À¯¿ªÀÇ À¯¿ªÆ¯¼ºÄ¡·Î¼ °¢ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇÕ¼º´ÜÀ§µµ¸¦ À¯µµÇϰí À̵é ÇÕ¼º´ÜÀ§µµ¿Í ½ÇÃø´ÜÀ§µµ¸¦ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ư¼ºÀ» ¹ß°ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. Snyder ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ã·µÎÀ¯·®°ú ±Ù»çÇÏ¿´À¸³ª ÷µÎÀ¯·®ÀÇ 25,50,75%µÇ´Â ´ÜÀ§µµÀÇ ÁÂÇ¥¸¸À¸·Î´Â ´ÜÀ§µµÀÇ ÇüÀ» °áÁ¤Çϱ⿣ ¹ÌÈíÇÔÀÌ ³²¾ÆÀÖ´Ù. Clark ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÇÕ¼º´ÜÀ§µµ¸¦ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô À¯µµÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ±× À¯¿ªÀÇ ½Ã°£-¸éÀûµµÀÇ ±âÀúÀå°ú µîÀ¯´Þ½Ã°£¸éÀûÀ» Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ±¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¸ð»öµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù. Nash ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇÕ¼º´ÜÀ§µµÀÇ Ã·µÎÀ¯·®°ú ±âÀú½Ã°£Àº ÀúÀå»ó¼ö¿Í Gamma ÇÔ¼öÀÎÀÚ¸¸ÀÇ ÇÔ¼öÀ̱⠶§¹®¿¡ Á¤È®ÇÑ ÀúÀå»ó¼ö¿Í Gamma ÇÔ¼öÀÎÀÚÀÇ °áÁ¤ÀÌ ¼±ÇàµÇ¾î¾ß¸¸ ½Åºù¼ºÀÖ°í Á¤µµ°¡ ³ôÀº ´ÜÀ§µµ À¯µµ°¡ °¡´ÉÇϸ®¶ó ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. S.C.S ¹æ¹ý¿¡¼ ÷µÎÀ¯·®Àº À¯¿ª¸éÀû¿¡ ºñ·ÊÇϰí ÷µÎÀ¯·® ¹ß¼º½Ã°£¿¡ ¹Ýºñ·ÊÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ÷µÎÀ¯·® ¹ß»ýÀÌ ºü¸¥ ¼ÒÀ¯¿ª¿¡¼´Â ´Ù¼Ò Å« ÷µÎÀ¯·® °ªÀ» °®À½À» ¾Ë¾Ò´Ù. |
|
| The objective of this study was to determine the best representative synthetic unit hydrograph that is applicable to ungaged small watershed. A typical unit hydrograph was established with the actual data from a small watershed. Four currently well-known methods for analyzing ungaged small watershed, including Snyder's, Clark's S.C.S. and Nash methods, were evaluated with the data from the same small watershed. The following observations were noted from the analysis of four methods. The Snyder's method yielded the similar peak discharge value as the typical unit hydrograph. With co-ordinates of three discharge values, i.e. 25%, 50% and 75% of peak discharge, were not adequate for deriving a typical unit hydrograph in ungaged small watershed. With Clark's method there shall be some way of obtaining the exact base length of time area diagram and isochrone of each reach of the stream. With Nash method peak discharge and base flow time are affected by the storage constant and gamma function argument; therefore, for deriving a more reliable and workable unit hydrograph one needs to select for the better estimation of storage constant and gamma function argument. In S.C.S. method peak discharge is directly related to the watershed area and inversely related to the time of peak diacharge. Therefore area with faster peak discharge yielded the higer peak discharge value. Although the peak discharge value obtained frome the S.C.S. method higher than the value obtained from the unit hydrograph developed from the actual data, this method contains a number of advantageous factors. The peak discharge value and the time of peak discharge can be claculated easity from the morphological characteristics of the watershed, and in S.C.S method co-ordinates of the unit hydrograph can be calculated easily from that of the dimensionless unit hydrograph. When the four currently used methods were evaluated with a typical unit hydrograph obtained from the actual data, the S.C.S method was show to be the best method in deriving a synthetic unit hydrograph for ungaged small watershed. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.2, 1986³â, pp.157-166
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-9488
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198611920091597)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|