¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.10, no.3, 2009³â, pp.72-82
WTO Á¤ºÎÁ¶´ÞÇùÁ¤ °Ç¼³¼­ºñ½º ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ± ÀÎÇϽÃÀÇ °Ç¼³½ÃÀå º¯È­¿Í ´ëÀÀ¹æ¾È
( Market effects analysis of when lowering the threshold value of construction services under WTO GPA )
¹®Çõ;±è¸í¼ö; ±¹Å俬±¸¿ø ÁÖÅÃÅäÁö.°Ç¼³°æÁ¦¿¬±¸º»ºÎ;°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ °æÁ¦Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°Ç¼³¼­ºñ½º ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ± ÀÎÇÏ ¹®Á¦´Â ±¹³» Áß ¼Ò °Ç¼³¾÷üÀÇ ÀÌÇØ°ü°è¿Í ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÏ°Ô ¿¬°üµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ¹Ù, ±¹³» °ü·Ã Á¦µµ ¹× °Ç¼³½ÃÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼ºÎÀû ºÐ¼®ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ Áß ¼Ò °Ç¼³¾÷ü¸¦ À§ÇÑ 'Áö¿ªÁ¦ÇÑÀÔÂûÁ¦µµ' ¹× 'Áö¿ªÀǹ«°øµ¿µµ±ÞÁ¦µµ' µî¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í, ±Ã±ØÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ÀÌµé ¾÷üÀÇ ¼öÁÖ½ÃÀå¿¡µµ º¯È­°¡ ¿¹»óµÇ¹Ç·Î ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çÀüÀû °ËÅä°¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ±À» ³·Ãâ °æ¿ì ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ °Ç¼³»ê¾÷¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¾ø´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â °Ç¼³¼­ºñ½º ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ± Á¶Á¤À¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ ½ÇÁ¦ ¼öÁÖ½ÃÀåÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ Àü¸ÁÇØ º¸°í ±× ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ È¿°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© '°Ç¼³¼­ºñ½º ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ± ÀÎÇÏ' ¹®Á¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âº» ÀÔÀå Á¤¸³ÀÇ ±Ù°Å ÀڷḦ Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ÇöÀç WTO GPAÀÇ Àû¿ëÀ» ¹Þ´Â ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ±Àº Á¤ºÎ¹ßÁÖ°ø»çÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â 500¸¸ SDR(74¾ï¿ø)À̸ç, ÁöÀÚü¿Í ±âŸ°ø»çÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â 1,500¸¸ SDR(222¾ï¿ø)ÀÌ´Ù. Á¤ºÎ´Â Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´Üü ¹× °ø±â¾÷ µî ±âŸ±â°üÀÇ °Ç¼³¼­ºñ½º ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ±¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© 'Áö¿ªÀǹ«°øµ¿µµ±ÞÁ¦µµ' µîÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ³ôÀº ¼öÁØÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ Áö¹æÁ¤ºÎ±â°ü ¹× °ø±â¾÷ÀÇ °Ç¼³¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ±Àº ÀϺ»°ú ÇÔ²² ÇöÀç 1,500¸¸ SDR·Î¼­, ¿©Å¸±¹ÀÇ 500¸¸ SDR¿¡ ºñÇØ ¿ùµîÈ÷ ³ô°Ô ¼³Á¤µÈ »óȲÀ̸ç ÃÖ±Ù ¹Ì±¹À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î EC µî ÁÖ¿ä ȸ¿ø±¹Àº Áö¹æÁ¤ºÎ±â°ü ¹× °ø±â¾÷ÀÇ ÇÏÇѼ±À» ¿Ü±¹ÀÇ °æ¿ì¿Í °°ÀÌ 500¸¸ SDR·Î ÀÎÇÏÇÒ °ÍÀ» ¿ä±¸Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ 500¸¸ SDR·ÎÀÇ °³¹æ È®´ë´Â '07³â ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÃÑ 2Á¶ 105¾ï¿ø ±Ô¸ðÀÇ ½ÃÀåÀÌ Ãà¼ÒµÇ¾î, ÀÌ´Â Áö¿ª¾÷üµé¿¡°Ô ºÎ´ãÀ» ÁÙ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÈ´Ù. Áö¿ª¾÷üµéÀÇ ¼öÁÖ ºñÁßÀº ±Ô¸ð°¡ ÀÛÀº °ø»çÀϼö·Ï ³ô¾ÆÁö¹Ç·Î, ÃÑ 2Á¶ 105¾ï¿ø ±Ô¸ðÀÇ ½ÃÀå°¨¼Ò(°øµ¿µµ±Þ 1Á¶ 6,802¾ï¿ø, ´Üµ¶µµ±Þ 3,407¾ï¿ø)´Â Áö¿ª¾÷ü ¼öÁÖȰµ¿¿¡ ÀûÁö ¾ÊÀº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÈ´Ù.
Lowering threshold value of construction services is extremely sensitive issue to the small and medium enterprises in construction industry. Because it means opening the construction markets where the small and medium construction companies compete intensely. Nevertheless, it is absent that the analysis on the effect of opening the market lowering threshold value of construction services under Government Procurement Agreements or Free Trade Agreement. This research is to analyze the effects of lowering threshold value of construction service which have been agenda repeatedly in the international agreements such as WTO and FTA. The current threshold value of construction services of Korea under WTO GPA are 5million SDR where the government delivers and 15million SDR where the local government or the public institution deliver. However major parties to an entente such as USA and EU have been demanding to lower threshold value of 15 million SDR where the local government or the public institution deliver to 5million SDR. The analysis figure the effect of this lowering threshold value to be a market reduction by 2trillion Won as '07 fiscal year basis. This market shrinkage will effect to the small and medium construction companies in local considerably.
 
Ű¿öµå
Á¤ºÎÁ¶´ÞÇùÁ¤;°Ç¼³¼­ºñ½º ¾çÇãÇÏÇѼ±;Áö¿ªÁ¦ÇÑÀÔÂû;Áö¿ªÀǹ«°øµ¿µµ±Þ;WTO;FTA;GPA;threshold value;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.10, no.3, 2009³â, pp.72-82
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200918133144537)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿