¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.9, no.5, 2008³â, pp.86-94
°øµ¿ÁÖÅà »ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý/ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ WBS °³¹ß
( WBS Development for Acquisition and Analysis of public Housing Productivity Data )
±èÀç¿ì;±è¿¹»ó;±è¿µ¼®;±è»ó¹ü; ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³È¯°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃàÇкÎ;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
»ý»ê¼ºÀº ¸ðµç »ý»êÁ¶Á÷ÀÇ °ß½Ç¼º ¹× »ý»ê Ȱµ¿ÀÇ È¿À²¼º Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ °æ¿µ ÁöÇ¥ Áß Çϳª·Î½á »ý»ê¼ºÀÇ ±â´ÉÀº °Ç¼³ »ê¾÷¿¡ À־µµ ¿¹¿ÜÀÏ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ±¹³»ÀÇ °æ¿ì »ý»ê¼ºÀÇ Á߿伺°ú ±× ±â´É¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í °Ç¼³ »ý»ê¼º °ü¸®¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ »çÇ×Àº ´ëºÎºÐ ÇöÀå°ü¸®ÀÚÀÇ °æÇè°ú Á÷°ü¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç »ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ µ¥ÀÌÅͺ£À̽ºÈ­ÇÏ¿© °ø»ç°èȹ ¹× °ü¸®¿¡ Àû±ØÈ°¿ëÇÏÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦´Â »ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ Á¤º¸ÀÇ ¼öÁý ¹× ºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀÌ Ã¼°èÀûÀÌÁö ¸øÇÑ °á°ú·Î, »ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍÀÇ È¿°úÀûÀΠȰ¿ëÀ» À§ÇØ ¿ì¼±ÀûÀ¸·Î WBS°³¼±ÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¿¬±¸¹®Çå ºÐ¼®, ÇØ¿Ü»ç·Ê ºÐ¼®À¸·Î ¿¬±¸¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÔ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀûÇÕ¿©ºÎ ¹× °³¼±»çÇ×À» µµÃâÇϰí, ÇöÀå ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ ÇöÀå¿©°ÇÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÑ ÈÄ, ¼³Á¤µÈ ±âº»¹æÇâÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î »ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý ¹× ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ WBS¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î »ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý ¹× ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ Ã¼°è·ÎÀÇ °ËÁõÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇâÈÄ ±¸ÃàµÈ WBS¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼öÁýµÈ »ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍ´Â OLAPÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ »ý»ê¼º ºÐ¼® ¹× Data MiningÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ »ý»ê¼º ¿¹Ãø¿¡µµ Ȱ¿ëµÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
Productivity is one of key management indexes for evaluating soundness of a manufacturing organization and its efficiency. In many aspects of productivity management in the construction industry, however, intuition of an experienced field manager still plays a greater role while productivity data is not utilized efficiently for the construction management purposes, because the collection and analysis of the productivity-related information are not systematic. Lack of systematic method in collecting and analyzing the productivity data results in such problems. The existing WBS should therefore be improved to solve them. The authors developed a new WBS for productivity data collection and analysis by following the research direction that was determined by literature reviews, overseas cases, and interviews with field engineers. The new breakdown structure was then evaluated for its feasibility as a productivity analysis framework. It is expected that the productivity data collected by the WBS will be used for OLAP and mining for future productivity forecast.
 
Ű¿öµå
»ý»ê¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍ;ÀÛ¾÷ºÐ·ùü°è;»ý»ê¼º °ü¸®;»ý»ê¼º ¿¹Ãø;Productivity Data;Work Breakdown Structure;Productivity Management;Productivity Forecast;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.9, no.5, 2008³â, pp.86-94
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200835054211535)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿