¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.9, no.3, 2008³â, pp.164-174
°ø°ø°Ç¼³°ø»çÀÇ ÃÖÀû ÀÔÂû¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤¸ðµ¨
( A Selection Model of Suitable Tendering System for Public Construction Projects )
À¯ÀÏÇÑ;±è°æ·¡; (Àç)´ëÇѰǼ³Á¤Ã¥¿¬±¸¿ø;¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃàÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
»ç¾÷Ư¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ¼±Á¤Àº ÇØ´ç »ç¾÷ÀÇ ¼º°øÀû ¼öÇàÀ» À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À̸ç, ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤ÀÇ °¡Àå ÇÙ½ÉÀº ÀÔÂû¹æ½ÄÀÇ °áÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ±¹³» °ø°ø°Ç¼³°ø»çÀÇ ÀÔÂû¹æ½ÄÀ» º¸´Ù ´Ù¾çÈ­ÇÏ·Á´Â ÃëÁö¿¡¼­ ÀçÁ¤°æÁ¦ºÎ´Â 2007³â 10¿ù ±¹°¡°è¾à¹ý½ÃÇà·É °³Á¤À» ÅëÇØ "±â¼úÁ¦¾ÈÀÔÂû", "¼³°è°ø¸ð ±â¼úÁ¦¾ÈÀÔ"À» »õ·ÎÀÌ µµÀÔÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀÔÂû¹æ½Ä Áß »ç¾÷Ư¼º¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ´ë¾ÈÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ´Â ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ ÀÔÂû¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤¸ðµ¨À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¹³»¿Ü ¼±Ç࿬±¸ ºÐ¼® ¹× ¸é´ãÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¿ì¼± ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ frameworkÀ» ±¸ÃàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î °ÇÃà ¹× Åä¸ñ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Àü¹®°¡ 265ÀÎÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç °á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ÀÔÂû¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤±âÁØÀÇ »ó´ëÀû °¡ÁßÄ¡¿Í ÀÔÂû¹æ½Ä ´ë¾Èº° È¿¿ëÀ» Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ Æò°¡±âÁØÀ¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ¹ßÁÖ¿¹Á¤ÀÎ 3°³ÀÇ °ø°ø°Ç¼³°ø»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç·Ê Àû¿ëÀ» ÅëÇØ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ °³¹ßÇÑ ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ½Ç¹« Àû¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ ±¸Ã¼Àû ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ç·ÊÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¿¡ ¸ðµ¨À» Àû¿ëÇÑ °á°ú, ÀÔÂû¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤±âÁØÀÇ ¼±º° °úÁ¤À» ³í¸®È­ÇÏ´Â ¿¬±¸¿Í »ç¾÷À¯Çüº°·Î Ç¥ÁØ °¡ÁßÄ¡ ¹× È¿¿ëÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â ÈļÓÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â °á·ÐÀ» µµÃâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
It is crucial In decision making to select a project delivery system (PDS) adjusted accordingly to the project characteristics. Furthermore, selecting a tendering system is the kernel in the process of selecting PDS. In October 2007, the Ministry of Finance and the Economy of Korea launched two new project delivery systems, "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contracts (Design-Build)" by revising enforcement ordinances of "Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party" to provoke the tendering systems. In order to support the proposed purpose, this research developed a selection model for suitable tendering system, which helps a public owner select a tendering system appropriate to the project characteristics. First, the framework of the model was set throughout analyzing previous researches and interviewing relevant experts. Additionally, by analyzing the survey result from 265 experts engaged in architectural and civil engineering business, the relative weights of the selection factors and the effectiveness values of the alternatives were suggested as the quantitative evaluation references. Finally, the practical guideline was suggested to apply this model to three public projects scheduled to be delivered. The result of applying the model to three case projects showed that further researches were needed to make the selection process logical and to suggest the standard weights and effectiveness values according to project type.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÀÔÂû¹æ½Ä;»ç¾÷Ư¼º;¼±Á¤¸ðµ¨;°¡ÁßÄ¡;È¿¿ë;Tendering System;Project Characteristics;Selection Model;Relative Weights;Effectiveness Values;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.9, no.3, 2008³â, pp.164-174
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200820055488650)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿