¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.9, no.3, 2008³â, pp.153-163
°è¼Óºñ »ç¾÷ È®´ë·Î ÀÎÇÑ °ø°ø°Ç¼³»ç¾÷ ÆÄ±ÞÈ¿°ú ºÐ¼®
( An Empirical Study on the Effect of public Construction Industry by Expansion of New Budget System )
±è»ó¹ü;ÀÌÁ¤´ë;Á¶ÁöÈÆ; µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°Ç¼³»ê¾÷Àº ±¹³» ÃÑ»ý»ê(GDF)±âÁØÀÇ ¾à 15%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ±¹°¡±â°£»ê¾÷À̸ç, °ø°øºÎºÐ¿¡ ¸Å³â ¾à 50Á¶¿øÀÇ ¿¹»êÀ» ÅõÀÔÇÏ¿© °æÁ¦, »çȸ¹ßÀüÀÇ ±â¹ÝÀÌ µÇ´Â »çȸ½Ã¼³¹°ÀÇ °Ç¼³°ú Á¤ºñ»ç¾÷À» ¼öÇà Áß¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. °ø°ø °Ç¼³»ê¾÷ÀÇ °æ¿ì »ç¾÷ÀÌ ´ë±Ô¸ð·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö¹Ç·Î È¿À²Àû °ü¸®¸¦ ÅëÇÑ °ø»çºñ Àý°¨Àº Á¤ºÎÀÇ ÀçÁ¤»óÅ ¹× »çȸ¹ßÀü¿¡ Å©°Ô ±â¿©ÇÑ´Ù. ±¹³»¿¡¼­ °ø°ø°ø»çÀÇ Áö¹èÀûÀÎ ¿¹»êÁ¦µµÀÇ Çϳª·Î¼­ Ȱ¿ëµÇ¾î¿Â Àå±â°è¾àÁ¦µµ´Â °ø»ç¿¬Àå ºóµµµµ ³ô°í, ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼Õ½Çºñ¿ë ¶ÇÇÑ ¸·´ëÇÏ¿© ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëÃ¥ÀÌ ½Ã±ÞÈ÷ ¿ä±¸µÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. À̸¦ °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© 1999³â ¼ö¸³µÈ '°ø°ø°Ç¼³È¿À²È­Á¾ÇÕ´ëÃ¥'¿¡¼­´Â °è¼Óºñ »ç¾÷ÀÇ È®´ë¸¦ ÃßÁøÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ±¹³» ¿¹»êÁ¦µµÀÇ Ã¼°è¿Í °ø°ø°ø»çÀÇ °è¾à¹æ½Ä ºñ±³/ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© Àå±â°è¼Ó°è¾àÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡µéÀ» µµÃâÇÏ¿´°í, °è¼Óºñ »ç¾÷ÀÌ °ø°ø°ø»ç¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Á¤ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿© ÇâÈÄ °è¼Óºñ »ç¾÷ È®´ë°¡ °Ç¼³»ç¾÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÆÄ±ÞÈ¿°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÑ 5°³ ±â°ü, 72°³ÀÇ °³º°»ç¾÷ÀÇ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ¼º°ú ÃøÁ¤°á°ú, °è¼Óºñ »ç¾÷ÀÌ Àå±â°è¼Ó°ø»ç »ç¾÷¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© »ç¾÷±â°£ ´ÜÃà¿¡ µû¸¥ Æò±Õ»ç¾÷ºñÀÇ 0.13%, Àý°¨È¿°ú»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ¿¬ºÎ¾× Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇÑ »ç¾÷±â°£ ´ÜÃà, °ø»çÈ¿À²È­¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ¾à 9.83%ÀÇ °ø»çºñ Àý°¨È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â ÇâÈÄ °ø°ø°ø»ç ¼öÇà¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¿¹»ê»óȲ¿¡ ¾Ë¸ÂÀº °ø»ç¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¼±Á¤ ¹× °è¼Óºñ »ç¾÷ È®´ëÀÇ ´çÀ§¼ºÀ» ÀÔÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Domestic construction industry accounts about 15% of Gross Domestic Product(GDP) and Korean government spends approximately 50 trillion won per year for public infrastructure projects. Effective management of public construction projects would result in cost saving and enhance financial stability of the government. In doing so, the government promoted a new budgeting system, Continual Budget Method(CBM) as a part of public project performance enhancement program published in 1999. This research mainly attempted to investigate and analyze the impact of new budgeting in term of cost and schedule performance. Based on the analysis result of n2 projects. The new budgeting system could save project cost by 9.83y. Due to the saving of indirect costs from reduction. Although limited government budget cannot allow all the projects to be excuted with the new budgeting system, the new budgeting system should be more-widely utilized in the public sector because of its proven benefits from this research.
 
Ű¿öµå
°ø°ø°ø»ç;¿¹»êÁ¦µµ;Àå±â°è¼Ó°è¾à;°è¼Óºñ;Continual Budget Method;New Budget Method;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.9, no.3, 2008³â, pp.153-163
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200820055488648)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿