¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.11, no.3, 2010³â, pp.43-54
»ç¾÷ ´Ü°èº° ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ Áö¿ø °ÔÀÌÆ®¿þÀÌ ¸®ºä ü°è ±¸Ãà
( Development of Gateway Review System for Supporting Collaborative Decision-Making through Project Life Cycle )
½Å½Â¿ì;ÀÌÁؼº;ÀÌÁöÈñ;¹Ú°æ·Ï;ÀÓÁö¿¬; ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÃÖ±Ù Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â µµ½Ãȯ°æÁ¤ºñ»ç¾÷, Àç°³¹ß »ç¾÷ µî°ú °°ÀÌ ¹Î °üÀÌ ÇÔ²² ÁÖ°ü½ÃÇàÁÖü·Î¼­ Âü¿©ÇÏ´Â µµ½ÃÀç»ý»ç¾÷Àº °ü¸®¿µ¿ª ȤÀº ÁÖ°üÁÖü¿¡ µû¶ó ´Ù¼öÀÇ µ¶¸³µÈ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®·Î ±¸ºÐÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç °¢ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®´Â °íÀ¯ÀÇ ¾÷¹« ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¼öÇàµÈ´Ù. ´Ù¼öÀÇ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®°¡ º´Çà ȤÀº ¼øÂ÷ÀûÀ¸·Î ÁøÇàµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ °Å¹ö³Í½º °³³äÀÌ Àû¿ëµÈ °ü¸®¹æ¾ÈÀ¸·Î½á »ç¾÷´Ü °èº° °ËÅä¿Í ÇùÀǰ¡ ¿ä±¸µÇ´Â ÁöÁ¡(Gate)À» ½ÃÇàÁÖü¿Í ´Ù¼öÀÇ Âü¿©ÀÚ°¡ °øÅëÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁöÇϰí ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÏ¿© ¼³Á¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »ç¾÷´Ü°èº° ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚÀÇ ¿ªÇÒ°ú Ã¥ÀÓÀÌ ±ÔÁ¤µÇ°í ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ °´°üÀûÀÎ ÇÊ¿äÁ¤º¸°¡ °øÀ¯µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» ¶§ ½Å·Ú°¡ Çü¼ºµÇ¸ç °á±¹ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ°£ÀÇ »óÃæ±¸µµ¿¡¼­ Çù·Â±¸µµ·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀ» ±â´ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â µµ½ÃÀç»ý»ç¾÷°ú °°Àº ¸Þ°¡ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®(Mega Project)ÀÇ ½ÃÇàÁÖü°¡ »ç¾÷°ü¸®¸¦ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï »ç¾÷´Ü°èº° ÁÖ¿ä ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ Áö¿øµµ±¸·Î¼­ °ÔÀÌÆ®¿þÀÌ ¸®ºä(Gateway Review) ü°è ±¸ÃàÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÑ´Ù.
As Urban Regeneration is being carried out, stakeholders are most likely to have disagreements on their interests. Besides, dispersion of numerous communication routes and obscure decision processes aggravate the situation. Eventually, fragmented decision-making processes and complex structure lead to inefficient outcome and delay of projects. This paper is a study on decision-making support not only helps the program manager have more efficient and optimum decision, but also provides alternatives for Urban Regeneration. This study is conducted as follows. Firstly, the project process and the decision-making structure among stakeholders in Urban Regeneration are analyzed, and then the current status of decision-making in Urban Regeneration project is classified. Secondly, with literature study on "Gateway Review", the decision-making gateway review process in Urban Regeneration is defined, and then the "Gateway Review Elements" are listed. Thirdly, to establish gateway review process, this paper presents a check points, namely gate which supports a program manager to monitor and to control the program management in Urban Regeneration. Each gate has several supporting tools such as diagram of critical decision points relation, scheme of stakeholder, checklist. Fourthly, the proposed concept is verified by experts who have been carefully selected to provide their respective reviews. Finally, decision-making support gateway review system is modified based on their critiques and suggestions.
 
Ű¿öµå
°ÔÀÌÆ®¿þÀÌ ¸®ºä;Çù·ÂÀû ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤;µµ½ÃÀç»ý»ç¾÷;Gateway Review;Decision-making;Urban Regeneration;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.11, no.3, 2010³â, pp.43-54
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201027463260014)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿