¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.9, no.1, 2008³â, pp.96-106
ÇØ¿Ü»ç·Ê º¥Ä¡¸¶Å·¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ ±¹³» CM ´ë°¡Ã¼°è °³¼± ½Ã»çÁ¡ µµÃâ
( A Benchmarking Study on CM Fee Estimation )
±è»ó¹ü;ÀÌÁ¤´ë;±èÀç¿í; µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±¹³» CMÀº 2001³â °Ç¼³»ê¾÷±âº»¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °³³ä°ú ¹üÀ§°¡ Á¤ÀÇµÈ ÈÄ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¼ºÀåÀ» °è¼ÓÇØ ¿À°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ CM Á¦µµ¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ ¼ºÀå¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ±¹³»¿¡¼­ÀÇ CM Àû¿ë¼º°ú´Â ±â´ëÄ¡¿¡ ºñÇØ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³·Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±× ÁÖ¿ä¿øÀÎÀÇ Çϳª·Î ±¹³» CMÁ¦µµ°¡ Ã¥ÀÓ°¨¸®¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¾÷¹«¹üÀ§°¡ ³ÐÁö¸¸, ´ë°¡±âÁØÀº Ã¥ÀÓ°¨¸®¿¡ ºñÇØ ³·±â ¶§¹®ÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, ±¹³» CM ´ë°¡Ã¼°èÀÇ ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ ±âÁØÀ» Á¤¸³ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ½Ã±ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â CM ´ë°¡Ã¼°èÀÇ ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ ±âÁØÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© CMAA, ASCE, DOE, DOL µîÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇØ¿Ü»ç·Ê º¥Ä¡¸¶Å· ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ±¹³» CM ´ë°¡Ã¼°è¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ´ë°¡ »ó½Â¿äÀÎÀ» ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ°í ´ë°¡»êÁ¤ °³¼±¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú ´ë°¡¼öÁØÀº ÇØ¿Ü¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô ³·Àº ¼öÁØÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¾÷¹«¹üÀ§´Â ÇØ¿Ü¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ±× ÆøÀÌ Á¼À¸¸ç ȹÀÏÀûÀÎ ±¸Á¶¸¦ °¡Áø °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ±Û·Î¹ú½ºÅĴٵ忡 µû¸£´Â ±¹³» CM ´ë°¡Ã¼°è¸¦ °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÇºñÁ¤¾×º¸¼ö°¡»ê(Cost Plus Fixed Fee) ¹æ½ÄÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϰí, ÀÔ ³«Âû Àü¹Ý¿¡ °ÉÄ£ CM ´ë°¡Ã¼°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÁØ(Framework)À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
The Korean Construction Industry significantly contributed to the Korean economic development not only by preparing the domestic infrastructure but also by successfully conducting various international projects. However, major incidents such as the collapse of Sung-Su Bridge and Sam-Pung Department Store along with stagnation of Korean Economy have raised questions about underlying systematic problems of the Korean Construction Industry. As a solution to resurrect the Korean Construction Industry, the Construction Management (CM) system introduced in late 1990's and increasingly utilized as an innovative delivery system. Despite of the fast growth of CM, the performance of CM has not been up to the hype and low CM fee has been identified as one of the main reasons of unsatisfactory CM performance. Therefore, this research attempted to propose ways of improving 'CM Fee Guidelines' published by Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation by conducting a benchmarking study on Global Standards of estimating CM Fee. International organizations benchmarked in this research include CMAA, ASCE, DOL, DOE, etc. Various investigation and analysis revealed that Korean 'CM Fee Guidelines' need to significantly modified comparing to Global Standards. This research also tried to prepare recommendations to improve the CM deliver system focusing on the 'Method of CM Fee Estimation' and Selection of a CM firm as an owner's agent.
 
Ű¿öµå
CM ´ë°¡;½ÇºñÁ¤¾×º¸¼ö°¡»ê ¹æ½Ä;ÇØ¿Ü»ç·Ê º¥Ä¡¸¶Å·;CM Fee Guidelines;Benchmarking;Cost Plust Fixed Fee;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.9, no.1, 2008³â, pp.96-106
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200833338747200)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿