¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.29, no.1, 1996³â, pp.191-202
»ó¼ö°íµµÁ¤¼öó¸®ÀÇ È¿À²Àû ÀÌ¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ °æÁ¦¼º °ËÅä
( Economic Feasibility Study on the Efficient Use of Advanced Water Treatment for Water Supply )
ÀÌ»óÀÏ; µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±âÁ¸ÀÇ Á¤¼ö󸮱â¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â 󸮵ÇÁö ¾Ê´Â ¿©·¯ °¡Áö À¯±â¹°ÁúÀÇ Ã³¸®¸¦ À§ÇØ »ó¼ö°íµµÃ³¸®°¡ µµÀԵǰí ÀÖ´Ù. ±¹³»½ÇÁ¤¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ °íµµÁ¤¼öó¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ °³¹ß°ú ¾Æ¿ï·¯, À̸¦ ½Ç»ýȰ¿¡ µµÀÔÇÒ °æ¿ìÀÇ ¼Ò¿äºñ¿ë°ú »çȸÀû ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸µµ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â °íµµÁ¤¼ö󸮽ýºÅÛÀÇ ¼³ºñºñ¿Í À¯Áöº¸¼öºñ¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¿ÀÁ¸°ú Ȱ¼ºÅº, ±×¸®°í ¸·ºÐ¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇϰí À̸¦ Á¤ºÎ¿¹»ê°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© Ÿ´ç¼ºÀ» °ËÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÅõÀÚºñ¿Í ½Ã¼³¿ë¶û¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ °ü°è½Äµµ À¯µµÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÑÆí, Á¤¼öµÈ »óÁúÀÇ ¹°À» ¼ö¿äÀÚ¿¡°Ô °ø±ÞÇÏ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀ» ³× °¡Áö·Î °ËÅäÇϰí À̸¦ ºÎ»êÁö¿ª¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ý»ê·®°ú ¼ö¼Ûü°è¿¡ µû¸¥ °¢°¢ÀÇ ´ë¾ÈÀ» °æÁ¦Àû/»çȸÀû Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú, À½¿ë¼ö¸¸À» °íµµÁ¤¼öó¸®ÇÏ¿© °ü·Î¸¦ ÅëÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í º´¹°·Î °ø±ÞÇÏ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀÌ ¼öÁúÀ» ¶³¾î¶ß¸®Áö ¾ÊÀ¸¸é¼­ °¡Àå °æÁ¦¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀΰÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
Advanced water treatment for water supply is being introduced for the treatment of various organic materials which cannot be removed by conventional water treatment methods. While the development of advanced water treatment system appropriate to the domestic enviropment of advanced water treatment system appropriate to the domestic environment is essential, the study on the economic costs and the social impact is also of importance. In this paper, it is shown how to estimate the costs (capital and maintenance) for advanced water treatment facilities, especially those using ozone treatment combined with activated carbon process and membrance separation. Estimated costs were compared with the government budget. Also, a general relation between the system capacity and investment was derived. Four alternatives were considered form the aspect of the amount of water to be produced and the delivery system to the user. These alternatives were applied to the city of Pusan. It turned out that bottled water, produced only for drinking, has best economic advantages in having minimum system capacity without detriment to water quality.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸÁö / v.29, no.1, 1996³â, pp.191-202
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-9488
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199611920096760)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿