¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.8, no.3, 2007³â, pp.106-115
´Ù¼Ó¼º È¿¿ëÀÌ·ÐÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ÅͳÎȯ±â¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤
( Decision Making Methodology on Ventilation System for Road Tunnels Based on Multi-Attribute Utility Theory )
ÀÌÇýÁø;°­»óÇõ;¹Ú¿ø¿µ;¼­Á¾¿ø; Çѱ¹½Ã¼³¾ÈÀü°ø´Ü ±â¼ú»ç¾÷´Ü ±â¼ú°³¹ß½Ç;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
»ê¾÷ÀÌ ¹ßÀüÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó µµ·Î ÅͳÎÀÇ »çÀÌÁî¿Í ±æÀÌ´Â °è¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇØ ¿ÔÀ¸¸ç ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ Åͳο¡¼­ÀÇ ¸®½ºÅ© ¶ÇÇÑ Áõ°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. µµ·ÎÅͳο¡¼­ ȯ±â¹æ½ÄÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÒ ¶§´Â ´Ù¾çÇÏ°í ¸¹Àº °í·Á»çÇ×À» ¿°µÎ¿¡ µÎ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ÇöÀç·Î¼­´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °ÍµéÀ» ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» Áö¿øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ý·Ð ³»Áö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ Á¦´ë·Î ±¸ÃàµÇ¾î ÀÖÁö ¾ÊÀº ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ¸ç ´ëºÎºÐ Àü¹®°¡ÀÇ °æÇèÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ÁÖ°üÀû ÆÇ´Ü¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ °æÁ¦¼º ³»Áö ÁÖ°üÀû ÆÇ´Ü¿¡ ±¹ÇÑÇÏ¿© ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´ø °üÇà¿¡¼­ ¹þ¾î³ª ¾ÈÀü¼º, ȯ°æÄ£È­¼º µîµµ ÃæºÐÈ÷ °í·ÁÇÏ¿© °áÁ¤À» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Åͳκ° ÃÖÀûÀÇ È¯±â¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±Á¤Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ ÀýÂ÷¿Í ±âÁØÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ ¶§ ´Ù¼Ó¼º È¿¿ëÀ̷аú, AHP±â¹ýÀ» ÀûÀýÈ÷ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© Àü¹®°¡ ¹× ¼³°èÀÚÀÇ ÁÖ°üÀû/Á¤¼ºÀû Æò°¡¸¦ °´°üÀû/Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ȯ±â ¹æ½Äº° Á¾ÇÕÀû È¿¿ëÀ» »êÃâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÔ¼ö¸¦ µµÃâÇϱâ±îÁöÀÇ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­ Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î º¸´Ù ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁú °ÍÀ» ±â´ëÇÑ´Ù.
The size and length of road tunnels have been gradually expanded as industry developed. Consequently, the risk has been increased. The decision making process for ventilation system for road tunnels involves a large amount of information on economic feasibility, construction methods, and safety etc. In situation where systematically structured decision making process is unavailable, almost decisions about ventilation systems are made based on engineers' private knowledge and experiences. Procedure and criteria to choose the best optimized ventilation system among many alternatives are proposed, breaking away from the economic dependency-oriented decision making. This paper presents a Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and AHP based function with which planners can calculate overall utility of each alternative. It is anticipated that the effective use of the proposed methodology for decision making on ventilation systems ould be able to reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of potential safety risks as well as increase the overall ventilation performance.
 
Ű¿öµå
´Ù¼Ó¼ºÈ¿¿ëÀÌ·Ð;ÅͳÎȯ±â¹æ½Ä;ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤½Ã½ºÅÛ;AHP±â¹ý;Multi Attribute Utility Theory;Tunnel Ventilation System;Decision Making System;AHP;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.8, no.3, 2007³â, pp.106-115
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200734515089133)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿