¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.15, no.3, 1982³â, pp.49-55
Áß¼ÒÇÏõÀ¯¿ª¿¡ À־ À¯È¿°­¿ì·® ¹× ¼³°è¼ö¹®°î¼±ÀÇ °áÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ - ƯÈ÷ SCS ¹æ¹ýÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( Determination of Effective Rainfall and Design Hydrograph in Small River Catchment )
±è»óÀÎ;À̼øÅÃ; Á¤È¸¿ø, Æ÷Ç׽Ǿ÷Àü¹®´ëÇÐ;º»ÇÐȸÀÌ»ç, ¿µ³²´ë °ø´ë±³¼ö, °ø¹Ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áß¼ÒÇÏõÀ¯¿ª¿¡ À־ ¹Ì±¹Åä¾çº¸Á¸Àü±¹(U.S. Soil conservation Service)ÀÇ SCS ¹æ¹ý°ú $Phi$-Index ¹æ¹ý°ú¸¦ ºñ±³Çϸ鼭 À¯È¿¿ì·®À» »êÁ¤ÇÏ°í ¶ÇÇÑ ¼³°è¼ö¹®°î¼±ÀÇ Ã·µÎÀ¯·®À» »êÁ¤Çϴµ¥ ¸ñÀûÀ» µÎ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ³«µ¿°­ À¯¿ª¿¡ ¼ÓÇÑ ½ÅõÀ¯¿ªÀº UNESCOÀÇ ÁÖ°ü¾Æ·¡ ±¹Á¦¼ö¹® °³¹ß°èȹ ´ëÇ¥½ÃÇèÀ¯¿ªÀ¸·Î äÅõǾú´ø À¯¿ªÀ¸·Î¼­ ±× Á߿伺ÀÌ Å©´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÏ¿© SCS ¹æ¹ýÀÇ Àû¿ëÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ±Õ¾ç±ºÀÇ ºÐ·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ë ¹× Ã³¸® »óÅÂ¿Í Åä¾çÀÇ ºÐ·ù, Åä¾çÀÇ Á¾·ù µîÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ¿© À¯Ãâ¼ö¸¦ ±¸ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÁÖ¿äÈ£¿ìÀÇ Ãѿ췮ÀÏÀ¯È¿¿ì·®°ü°è ÀÚ·á¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Æò±ÕÀ¯Ãâ¼ö¿Í ºñ±³ÇØ º» °á°ú SCS ¹æ¹ýÀÇ À¯Ãâ¼ö°¡ Àû°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ½ÅõÀ¯¿ªÀÇ 5°³ Ãø¼ÒÀÇ °­¿ìÀÚ·á·ÎºÎÅÍ $Phi$-Index ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ À¯È¿¿ì·®°úµµ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÑÆí ¼³°è¼ö¹®°î¼±ÀÇ Ã·µÎÀ¯·®Àº SCS¹ý, Chow¹ý, Mockus¹ý°ú ºñ±³ÇØ º» °á°ú, SCS¹ýÀÇ ¹«Â÷¿ø¼ö¹®°î¼±°ú Chow¹ýÀÌ ½ÇÃø¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ´ÜÀ§µµÀÇ Ã·µÎÀ¯·®°ú °¡±î¿î ÀûÇÕ¼ºÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to examine the methods of estimation, comparing U.S. SCS method and $Phi$-index with effective rainfall. And also comparision was made among SCS method, Chow method and Mockus method as to the peak discharge of design storm hydrograph by small river basin. Hydrological data of the Shin river basin which was used in this study and the results of study are as follow; 1) As a result of applying the SCS method to determine the effective rainfall out of total rainfall, it turned out that the everage CN of the basin as obtained by the analysis of hydrologic soil-cover complex was varied as follows; AMC-I was 27.9%, AMC-II 16.4%, AMC-III 8.1% less than the value given by SC method using discharge measurement. 2) The comparision of effective rainfall by the ungaged SCS method with that of gauged $Phi$-index method showed that the $Phi$-index method showed that the $Phi$-index method gives large value by 4.7% to those given by hydrograph. The result of analysis by the SCS method resulted in great difference from discharge measurement. 3) The comparision of SCS method, Chow method, and Mockus method showed that dimensionless hydrograph of SCS method and Chow method were close to the peak discharge of the gauged unit hydrograph, while the other methods gave far different results. 4) Attempts were made, for a better adaptation to the Shin river basin, to introduce lag time formula constant of dimensionless hydrograph of the SCS method by using the peak discharge of the gauged flow hydrograph.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.3, 1982³â, pp.49-55
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-9488
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198211920090496)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿