¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.42, no.12, 2009³â, pp.1029-1038
°ø°£ ´Ù±âÁØÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ¼Ò¼ö·Â °³¹ßÀÇ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§ °áÁ¤
( Priority Decision of Small Hydropower Development using Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Making )
±è±æÈ£;ÀÌÃæ¼º;¿©±Ôµ¿;½É¸íÇÊ; ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ ¼öÀÚ¿ø½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¬±¸¼Ò;ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ »çȸ±â¹Ý½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÇâÈÄ ¼Ò¼ö·Â ÀÚ¿øÀº dzºÎÇÑ ºÎÁ¸·®°ú ´õºÒ¾î »çȸÀû ¿Â½Ç°¡½º °¨Ãà ³ë·ÂÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ´ëü¿¡³ÊÁö·Î¼­ ¼ºÀåÀáÀç·ÂÀÌ Å¬ °ÍÀ¸·Î Àü¸ÁµÈ´Ù. °ú°Å¿¡ ¼Ò¼ö·Â °³¹ßÀ» À§ÇÑ ÀÚ¿øÁ¶»ç´Â ¸¹Àº ½Ã°£°ú ºñ¿ëÀÌ µå´Â ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç³ª Á¾ÀÌÁöµµ¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇØ ¿Ô´Ù. ±×¸®°í Ÿ´ç¼ºÆò°¡, °³¹ß ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§ °áÁ¤°ú °°Àº ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤½Ã ¹ßÀü ¼º´ÉƯ¼º°ú °æÁ¦¼º¿¡¸¸ Ä¡ÁßÇØ ¿Ô´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÃÖ±Ù µé¾î °æÁ¦ÀûÀÎ ºÎ¹® »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Àι®-»çȸ, ȯ°æ, »ýÅÂÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ °³¹ßÀÌ ´õ¿í °­Á¶µÇ¸é¼­ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´Ù±âÁØÀÇ °í·Á´Â Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ¼Ò¼ö·Â °³¹ßÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ÇʼöÀûÀÎ °ÍÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â °èÃþÈ­ºÐ¼® °úÁ¤°ú GIS¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼Ò¼ö·Â °³¹ßÀÇ °èȹ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ ´Ù¼öÀÇ ¼Ò¼ö·Â ÀÔÁöµé °£ÀÇ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °ø°£ ´Ù±âÁØÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¦½ÃµÈ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀº Ãʰ­À¯¿ª ¼Ò¼ö·Â ÀÔÁöµé °£ÀÇ °³¹ß ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§ °áÁ¤¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ºÐ¼®¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ °ø°£Á¤º¸ ÀÚ·á¿Í °³¹ß ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§ °á°ú¸¦ ³í¹®¿¡ ¼ö·ÏÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇâÈÄ ¼Ò¼ö·Â °³¹ß Ȱ¼ºÈ­¿¡ ´ëºñÇÑ ±âÃÊ¿¬±¸·Î¼­ ÀÇÀǰ¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¼Ò¼ö·Â °³¹ßÀÇ Å¸´ç¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤¿¡¼­ Ȱ¿ëµµ°¡ ³ôÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
Recently, it is expected that small hydropower (SHP) could potentially provide sufficient amounts of alternative energy in Korea where there is an abundance of potential sites and where social efforts are being made to reduce the emissions of green house gases. In the past, the resources survey for SHP development has been carried out using onsite surveys and paper maps, which incurred a great deal of time and cost. Furthermore, the tools for decision making such as determining development priorities or evaluating feasibility have been considered only economic aspect and focused on the performance characteristics of power generation. However, as the concept of sustainable development has been being advanced in recent years, especially focused on human-social, environmental and ecological in addition to economical sector; the consideration of these multiple criteria has become essential for sustainable SHP development. This study aims to propose the spatial multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology for determining priorities among a number of locations on the planning stage of SHP development using AHP and GIS. The proposed methodology is applied for determining development priorities among the SHP locations in Cho River basin and this study presents the detailed spatial information data and the results of development priorities. As a fundamental work, this study will be beneficial to the future activation of SHP development and will help the decision making in evaluating the feasibility of SHP development.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼Ò¼ö·Â;°ø°£ ´Ù±âÁØÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤;°èÃþÈ­ºÐ¼®°úÁ¤;Áö¸®Á¤º¸½Ã½ºÅÛ;¿ì¼±¼øÀ§;small hydropower;spatial MCDM;AHP;GIS;priority;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.42, no.12, 2009³â, pp.1029-1038
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200903538424645)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿