¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.34, no.2, 2001³â, pp.119-130
L-¸ð¸àÆ®¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇѰ­À¯¿ª Àϰ­¿ì·®ÀÚ·áÀÇ Áö¿ªºóµµÇؼ®
( Frequency Analysis of Daily Rainfall in Han River Basin Based on Regional L-moments Algorithm )
À̵¿Áø;ÇãÁØÇà; ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ »çȸȯ°æ¡¤°ÇÃà°øÇкΠÅä¸ñÀü°ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÇѰ­À¯¿ªÀÇ 1ÀÏ, 2ÀÏ, 3ÀÏ ¿¬ÃÖ´ë°­¿ìÀڷḦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î L-¸ð¸àÆ®¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÁöÁ¡ ºóµµÇؼ®°ú Áö¿ª ºóµµÇؼ®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ±× °á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Áö¿ªºóµµÇؼ®À» ½Ç½ÃÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ÇѰ­À¯¿ªÀ» ³²ÇѰ­, ºÏÇѰ­, ÇѰ­ÇÏ·ùºÎ À¯¿ªÀÇ 3°³ ¼ÒÀ¯¿ªÀ¸·Î ºÐÇÒÇϰí, °¢ À¯¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÚ·áÀÇ À̻굵 ¹× µ¿Áú¼ºÀ» °ËÅäÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢ ¼ÒÀ¯¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¿©·¯ ºÐÆ÷ÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÑ °á°ú, ³²ÇѰ­À¯¿ª°ú ÇѰ­ÇÏ·ùºÎ À¯¿ªÀº lognormal ºÐÆ÷Çü, ºÏÇѰ­ À¯¿ªÀº gamma-3 ºÐÆ÷ÇüÀÌ ÀûÁ¤ºÐÆ÷ÇüÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. Áö¿ªºóµµÇؼ®°ú ÁöÁ¡ºóµµÇؼ®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ¼±Á¤µÈ È®·üºÐÆ÷ÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ë, Monte Carlo ¸ðÀǸ¦ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀçÇö±â°£¿¡ µû¸¥ »ó´ëÆíÀÇ¿Í »ó´ëÁ¦°ö±Ù ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Áö¿ªºóµµÇؼ®°ú ÁöÁ¡ºóµµÇؼ®À» ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú »ó´ëÁ¦°ö±Ù¿ÀÂ÷¿¡ À־ Áö¿ªºóµµÇؼ®À» ¼öÇàÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ ÁöÁ¡ºóµµÇؼ®¿¡ ºñÇØ ±× °á°ú°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀçÇö±â°£ÀÌ Ä¿Áú¼ö·Ï ±× Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, ÇѰ­À¯¿ªÀÇ °­¿ì·®¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ Áö¿ªºóµµÇؼ® ¼öÇàÇÔÀÌ ÁöÁ¡ºóµµÇؼ®¿¡ ºñÇØ ¿ì¼öÇÏ´Ù´Â °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù.
At-site and regional frequency analyses of annual maximum 1-, 2-, and 3-days rainfall in Han River basin was performed and compared based on the regional L-moments algorithm. To perform regional frequency analysis, Han River basin was subdivided into 3 sub-basins such as South Han River, North Han River, and downstream regions. For each sub-basin, the discordancy and homogeneity tests were performed. As the results of goodness of fit tests, lognormal model was selected as an appropriate probability distribution for both South Han River and downstream regions and gamma-3 model for North han River region. From Monte carlo simulation, RBIAS and RRMSE of the estimated quantiles from regional frequency analysis and at-site frequency analysis were calculated and compared each other. Regional frequency analysis shows less RRMSE of the estimated quantiles than at-sites frequency analysis in overall return periods. The differences of BRMSE between two approaches increase as the return period increases. As a result, it is shown that regional frequency analysis performs better than at-site analysis for annual maximum rainfall data in Han River basin.
 
Ű¿öµå
at-site frequency analysis;regional frequency analysis;simulationl;L-moments algorithm;RBIAS;RRMSE;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.34, no.2, 2001³â, pp.119-130
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200111920731790)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿