¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.11, no.2, 2010³â, pp.3-14
´ë»ó°ø»çÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿äÀÎ ÀûÇÕµµ ºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ø°øºÎ¹® 'CM at Risk ¹æ½Ä' µµÀÔÀÇ Å¸´ç¼º ºÐ¼®
( Feasibility Analysis of Introducing CM at Risk Delivery Method to the Korean Public Construction Industry by Analyzing Attributes of the Projects )
°í¹ÎÇõ;±è¿¹»ó;±Ç¼ø¿í;Áø»óÀ±; ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³È¯°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°Ç¼³°ø»çÀÇ ¼º°øÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â °íµµÀÇ »ç¾÷°ü¸® ´É·ÂÀÌ Àý½ÇÈ÷ ¿ä±¸µÇ¸ç, À̸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¹æÆíÀÇ Çϳª·Î ´Ù¾çÇÑ CM ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ºÎ°¢µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ¸Æ¶ô¿¡¼­ ÃÖ±Ù µé¾î 'CM at Risk ¹æ½Ä'ÀÇ µµÀÔÀÌ Á¤ºÎ Â÷¿ø¿¡¼­ ¸ð»öµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª À̸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â ±×°ÍÀÌ ±¹³» °Ç¼³ »ê¾÷°ú µµÀÔ ´ë»óÀÌ µÇ´Â °ø°ø°Ç¼³°ø»çÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇѰ¡, ¶Ç Á¦µµ µµÀÔ ½Ã º»¿¬ÀÇ ÀåÁ¡À» ÃÖ´ëÇÑ »ì¸± ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °¡¿¡ ´ëÇѺм®ÀÌ ¼±ÇàµÇ¾î¾ßÇÑ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â 'GM at Risk ¹æ½Ä' µµÀÔ Àü, ±× ´ë»ó°ø»çÀÇ Æ¯¼º ¹× °¢ °ø°ø°ø»ç À¯Çüº° »ç¾÷Ư¼º°úÀÇ ÀûÇÕµµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© º» ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½Ä µµÀÔÀÇ Å¸´ç¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ °ø°ø½Ã¼³¹°ÀÇ À¯ÇüÀ» 9°¡Áö·Î ±¸ºÐÇϰí 'CM at Risk ¹æ½Ä'ÀÇ ÀϹÝÀû ÀΠƯ¼º°ú 'CM at Risk-GMP ¹æ½Ä', 'CM at Risk ¹æ½Ä-½ÇºñÁ¤»ê ¹æ½Ä'¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æ¯¼º¿äÀÎ 15°¡Áö¸¦ µµÃâÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, CM¾÷°èÀÇ Àü¹®°¡¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© °¢ À¯Çü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀûÇÕµµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú ¼³¹®¿¡ ÀÀ´äÇÑ CMÀü¹®°¡µéÀº 'CM at Risk ¹æ½Ä'ÀÇ µµÀÔ¿¡ ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀνÄÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö´Â ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÁö¸¸, °ø°ø°ø»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ 'CM at Risk ¹æ½Ä'ÀÇ Àû¿ëÀº °ø±â´ÜÃà¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Çʿ伺 ºÎÀ糪 ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ Á¦ÇÑµÈ ÀçÁ¤´É·Â µî, ±âÁ¸ ±¹³» °ø°ø°ø»çÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ±ØÈ÷ Á¦ÇÑÀûÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù.
A high degree of management skills and functions is essential to the success of construction projects. While the various construction management delivery methods have been realized as the solutions, Korean government is planning to introduce 'CM at Risk Method' to the public construction projects. However, even if its effect has been verified successful in the international market, it must be considered before legally adapting the method that it would be suitable to our public sector, In this respect, the purpose of this study is to evaluate and analyze feasibility of 'CM at Risk Method'. In order to do that, 15 attributes of construction projects were found, which were suitable to 'CM at Risk Method' in general, 'CM at Risk-GMP Method', and 'CM at Risk-Cost Reimbursable Method' and suitability of each attribute to each of 9 categories of public construction facilities was evaluated by questionnaire survey to CM specialists. Results showed that 'CM at Risk Method' might not bring improper effect to the industry but due to the characteristic of public sector, the effect would be very limited.
 
Ű¿öµå
CM at Risk ¹æ½Ä;CM at Risk-GMP ¹æ½Ä;CM at Risk-½ÇºñÁ¤»ê ¹æ½Ä;¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿äÀÎ;CM at Risk Method;CM at Risk-GMP Method;CM at Bisk-Cost Reimbursable Method;Attribute of Construction projects;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.11, no.2, 2010³â, pp.3-14
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201017337332349)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿