¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.36, no.6, 2003³â, pp.971-984
ÇÏõ º¸ÀÇ ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ °ø±â À¯ÀÔÀÇ ¼ö¸®ÇÐÀû °ËÅä
( Hydraulic Analysis of Air Entrainment by Weir Types )
±èÁøÈ«;½É¸íÇÊ;ÃÖ°è¿î;¿ÀÁ¾¹Î; Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;ÀÎõ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;°æÈñ´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÀÀ¿ëÈ­ÇдëÇРȯ°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â º¸ ¿ù·ù½Ã °ø±â À¯ÀÔÀ» ¼ö¸®ÇÐÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ ÇÏõ¿¡ ¼³Ä¡µÈ º¸ÀÇ ÇüÅ·μ­ °è´ÜÇü º¸¿Í ·¡¹ö¸°½º º¸ ¹× ¹è»ç¹® º¸¸¦ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© ÇöÁöÃøÁ¤°ú ¼ö¸®½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ »ê¼ÒÀü´Þ È¿À²À» °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ê¼ÒÀü´Þ È¿À²Àº °è´ÜÇü º¸°¡ Å©¸ç, ¹è»ç¹® º¸´Â »ê¼ÒÀü´Þ È¿À²ÀÌ ±×¸® Å©Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. »ê¼ÒÀü´ÞÀº È帧ÀÇ À¯¼Ó, Froude ¼ö, À¯·® ¼øÀ¸·Î »ó°ü °ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ È帧ÀÇ À¯³ì°ú »ê¼ÒÀü´Þ È¿À²¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº °ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¼ö¸®½ÇÇè °á°ú °è´ÜÇü º¸ÀÇ ¿ù·ù È帧Àº À¯·®ÀÌ ÀÛÀ» °æ¿ì °è´Ü Àü ±¸°£¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ÀáÀÔ·ù°¡ ¹ß»ýÇϰí, À¯·® Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¶ó ÀáÀÔ·ù¿Í Ç¥¸é·ù°¡ °øÁ¸Çϸç ÀÌ °æ¿ì °è´Ü »óºÎ²²¼­ Ç¥¸é·ù ¹× °è´Ü ÇϺο¡¼­ ÀáÀÔ·ù°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀáÀÔ·ùÀÇ °æ¿ì °è´Ü ³¡´Ü¿¡¼­ È帧 ºÐ¸®¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °ø±â À¯ÀÔÀÌ ½ÃÀ۵ǰí, ÀÚÀ¯³«ÇÏ nappe°ú °è´Ü ¾ÈÂÊÀÇ °ø±â ÁÖ¸Ó´Ï ¹× nappe impact¿Í ÀÌÈÄÀÇ µµ¼ö Çö»óÀ¸·Î ¸¹Àº °ø±â À¯ÀÔÀÌ ¹ß»ýµÇ¾ú´Ù. Ç¥¸é·ùÀÇ °æ¿ì °è´Ü ³¡´Ü¿¡¼­ °ø±â À¯ÀÔÀÌ ½ÃÀ۵ǰí, È帧ÀÌ °è´Ü°ú °è´ÜÀ» ½ºÃİ¡µíÀÌ È帣´Â °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ¼öÇ¥¸éÀÇ Áøµ¿¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¸¹Àº °ø±â°¡ À¯ÀԵǾúÁö¸¸ °ø±â À¯ÀÔÀº ÀáÀÔ·ùÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡ ºñÇØ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù.
This paper presents the hydraulic analysis of the air entrainment by the weir types. For the weir types, the stepped weir, the labyrinth weir and the gate underflow weir were selected, and the oxygen transfer efficiency was estimated by the site investigation and the hydraulic model tests. The most effective type for the oxygen transfer was stepped weir The more steps the stepped weir had, the higher efficiency it revealed. Oxygen transfer was proportional to the flow velocity, the Froude number, and the flow discharge in order. Hydraulic model tests showed that a nappe flow occurred at small flow rates. The concurrent condition of a nappe flow and a skimming flow occurred as flow rate increases, nappe flow at the upper part and skimming flow at the lower part. In the region of nappe flow, air inception occurred from the step edges due to flow separation, and air entrainment was made through a free-falling nappe, an air pocket, a nappe impact and a subsequent hydraulic jump. In the region of skimming flow, air entrainment occurred by the variation of water surface over the steps, but it was relatively small compared with nappe flow.
 
Ű¿öµå
°ø±â À¯ÀÔ;°è´ÜÇü º¸;·¡¹ö¸°½º º¸;¹è»ç¹® º¸;ÀáÀÔ·ù;Ç¥¸é·ù;air entrainment;stepped weir;labyrinth weir;gate underflow weir;nappe flow;skimming flow;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.36, no.6, 2003³â, pp.971-984
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311922122533)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿