¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.38, no.1, 2005³â, pp.37-48
ÇÏõÀÇ »ý¹°¼­½Äó º¹¿øÀ» À§ÇÑ ÇÏõÀÚ¿¬µµÆò°¡ : I. Æò°¡¹æ¹ýÀÇ Á¦¾È
( The Evaluation of River Naturalness for Biological Habitat Restoration : I. Proposal of Evaluation Method )
¹ÚºÀÁø;½ÅÁ¾ÀÌ;Á¤°ü¼ö; Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ±¹³»¤ý¿ÜÀÇ ÇÏõÀÚ¿¬µµÆò°¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¶»çÇϰí, ±¹³»¿¡¼­ ¿¬±¸¤ýÁ¦¾ÈµÈ ÇÏõÀÚ¿¬µµÆò°¡¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó ³»¸°Ãµ, º¹ÇÏõ°ú ¾È¾çõÀÇ 3°³ÇÏõÀÇ ½Ã¹üÆò°¡¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ã¹üÆò°¡ °á°ú, ÀÚ¿¬»óŰ¡ ºñ±³Àû Àß º¸ÀüµÈ ³»¸°ÃµÀº 2µî±Þ, ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀÎ ÈѼտ¡¼­ ȸº¹´Ü°è¿¡ ÀÖ´Â º¹ÇÏõÀº 3µî±Þ, ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀÎ ÈѼÕÀÌ ½É°¢ÇÑ ¾È¾çõÀº 4µî±ÞÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾î ºñ±³Àû ÇÏõÀÇ »ý¹°¼­½ÄóÀÇ ÈѼÕÁ¤µµ¸¦ ÀûÀýÈ÷ ¹Ý¿µÇϰí Àû¿ë¼ºÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î °ËÅäµÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» Æò°¡¹æ¹ýÀ» ±¹°¡ÇÏõ ¹× Áö¹æ1±ÞÇÏõ µî ´ëÇÏõ¿¡¼­µµ Àû¿ëÀÌ °¡´ÉÇϵµ·Ï Æò°¡ºÎ¹® ¹× Æò°¡Ç׸ñÀ» °³¼±ÇÏ¿© ÇÏõÀÇ »ý¹°¼­½Äó º¹¿øÀ» À§ÇÑ ÇÏõÀÚ¿¬µµÆò°¡ ¹æ¹ý°ú ÀýÂ÷¸¦ Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±Ý¹ø Á¦¾ÈÇÑ ÇÏõÀÚ¿¬µµÆò°¡´Â ÇÏõÇüÅÂ¿Í ÇÏõȯ°æÀÇ 2°³ Æò°¡ºÎ¹®°ú 14°³ÀÇ Æò°¡Ç׸ñÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºÇϰí, Æò°¡Ã´µµ´Â ÀÚ¿¬¼º Àú°¨Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¶ó 5µî±ÞÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Æò°¡´ÜÀ§´Â ÃÖÀû°£°ÝÀ» 2,000m¡­3,000m·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
The evaluation methods of river naturalness were reviewed, and one of the best methods was applied to three sample rivers-Narinchun, Bokhachun, Anyangchun. As a result, Narinchun with well preserved state, Bokhachun with being to restoration stage from the damaged, Anyangchun with severe damaged state showed 2$^{nd}$ , 3$^{rd}$ and 4$^{th}$ Grade. The application result shows the method is reliable for evaluating the damaged habitat in river. The method was improved on the evaluation items to apply lager river systems. This suggested method have 14 evaluation items with two category-river shape and river environment and five different Grades for evaluation degree according to state of natural closeness. The every 2,000-3,000m along the river system is recommended as the interval of evaluation unit. According to calssification of evaluation items, this method can supply various information related to river environment and ecology such as ecological deformation and diversity, cross sectional structure and continuity of river shapes..
 
Ű¿öµå
ÇÏõȯ°æ;»ý¹°¼­½Äó;ÇÏõº¹¿ø;ÇÏõÀÚ¿¬µµÆò°¡;Æò°¡ºÎ¹®;Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥;River Environment;Biological Habitat;River Restoration;Evaluation of River Naturalness;Assessment Criterion;Assessment Index;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.38, no.1, 2005³â, pp.37-48
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200514714215878)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿