¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.38, no.11, 2005³â, pp.937-946
Àú¼öÁö ÃÖÀû ¿î¿µ ¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ãß°¡ ¿ë¼ö °ø±Þ ´É·Â Æò°¡
( Assessment of Additional Water Supply Capacity Using a Reservoir Optimal Operation Model )
°­¹Î±¸;¹Ú½Â¿ì; Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Àú¼öÁöÀÇ ¿ë¼ö¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ë¼ö°ø±Þ´É·Â Æò°¡¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© Ãß°¡ °ø±Þ °¡´É·®°ú À̸¦ À§ÇÑ Àú¼öÁö ¿î¿µ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© Àü¿ª ÃÖÀûÇØ¸¦ Ž»öÇÏ´Â SCE-UA¹ý°ú ´ÙÁß ¸ñÀûÇÔ¼ö¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÑ ÃÖÀûÈ­ ¸ðÇü°ú Àú¼öÁöÀÇ À¯ÀÔ·®, ¼ö¿ä·®, ¹ßÀü·®À» ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ´Â Àú¼öÁö ¿î¿µ ¸ðÇüÀ» °áÇÕÇÑ Àú¼öÁö ÃÖÀû¿î¿µ ¸ðÇüÀ» °³¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. °³¹ßµÈ ¸ðÇüÀÇ Àû¿ë¼ºÀº ¼¶Áø°­´ïÀÇ ÃÖÀû¿î¿µ¿¡ ¸ðÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ðÇüÀÇ Àû¿ë±â°£Àº À¯ÀÔ·®À» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© dz¼ö±â, Æò¼ö±â, °¥¼ö±â·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´´Ù. dz¼ö±â¿¡´Â ¸ñÇ¥ ¿î¿µ¼öÀ§º°ÀÇ ¹ßÀü·®ÀÌ ½ÇÃø¹ßÀü·® º¸´Ù $-2.29{~}14.61%$, °¥¼ö±â¿¡´Â ½ÇÃø¹ßÀü·® º¸´Ù $-5.94{~}3.98%$ Áõ°¡µÈ °á°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. Æò¼ö±â¿¡´Â ½ÇÃø¹ßÀü·® º¸´Ù $-0.43{~}6.35%$ Áõ°¡ µÈ °á°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¼¶Áø°­´ïÀÇ ÇÏ·ù ¿ë¼ö Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ë¼ö°ø±Þ °¡´É·®À» »êÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ´ïÇÏ·ù ¹æ·ù·®À» 0.17, 0.50, 0.70, 1.0, 1.5, $3.0;m^3/sec$·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ÃÖÀû ¿î¿µÇÑ °á°ú, ÇÏ·ù ¹æ·ù·®À» $0.70;m^3/sec$ ÀÌÇÏ, ¸ñÇ¥ Àú¼öÀ§¸¦ 194.0m ÀÌÇÏ·Î ÇÒ °æ¿ì ½ÇÀû ¿î¿µ °á°ú º¸´Ù Çâ»óµÈ °á°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
The objective of the study is to develop a reservoir optimal operation model and to suggest the appropriate amount of additional water supply and optimal operation rule. The model uses multiple objective function and a global search method, SCE-UA method. The objective function is set up to maintain the storage at target level, to satisfy the water demand, and to maximize the hydropower product. To evaluate the model's applicability, the model was applied for allocating the optimal water depending on storage level changes of Seomjin dam. The results comparing optimal operation and historical data showed that hydropower product increased from $-2.29%$ to $14.51%$, $-5.94%$ to $3.98%$, and $-0.43%$ to $6.35%$ with varying target levels in wet, dry, and normal period, respectively. Also, The model was applied for assessing water supply capacity of Seomjin dam to satisfy increasing water demand. The dam was operated by the model on consideration of downstream flow as 0.17, 0.50, 0.70, 1.0, 1.5, and $3.0;m^3/sec$. The results showed that in case of operating the dam with downstream flow less than $0.70;m^3/sec$ and with target water level lower than 194.0 m, hydropower product was more than the historical operation data and existing amount of water supply was less influenced.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÃÖÀû ¿ë¼ö ¹èºÐ;Àü¿ª ÃÖÀûÈ­ ±â¹ý;¼¶Áø°­´ï;¿ë¼ö°ø±Þ´É·Â;´ÙÁ߸ñÀûÇÔ¼ö;Optimal water allocation;Global search method;Seomjin dam;Water supply capacity;Multiple objective function;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.38, no.11, 2005³â, pp.937-946
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200507523360774)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿