¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.38, no.3, 2005³â, pp.179-188
¼ö¸® ¹× ¼öÄ¡¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¿©¼ö·Î ¼³°è - È­ºÏ´Ù¸ñÀû´ï
( Spillway Design by Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model Experiment - Case Study of HwaBuk Multipurpose Dam )
±è´ë±Ù;ÃÖÁö¿õ;±èâ½Ã;ÀÌÁö¿ø; ¸ñÆ÷´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;(ÁÖ)EPS Solution;(ÁÖ)´ë¿ì°Ç¼³ Åä¸ñ»ç¾÷º»ºÎ;(ÁÖ)´ë¿ì°Ç¼³ Åä¸ñ»ç¾÷º»ºÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â È­ºÏ´Ù¸ñÀû´ïÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 2Â÷¿ø, 3Â÷¿ø ¼öÄ¡¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀÌ ¼ö¸®¸ðÇü½ÇÇè°ú ´õºÒ¾î ¼³°èÀÚ¿¡°Ô À¯¿ëÇÑ ÇØ¼®µµ±¸·Î »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» º¸¿´´Ù. 2Â÷¿ø, 3Â÷¿ø ¼öÄ¡¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î õ¼ö¹æÁ¤½ÄÀ» Áö¹è¹æÁ¤½ÄÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â RMA2¿Í RANS¸¦ Áö¹è¹æÁ¤½ÄÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â FLOW-3D ¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¸ôÁö¿ª°ú Á¢±Ù¼ö·Î¿¡¼­ÀÇ À¯È², ¿ù·ù¿þ¾îÀÇ ¹æ·ù´É·Â, ¿ù·ùºÎ, µµ·ùºÎ, °¨¼¼Áö¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼ö¸éÇü»ó, ¿ù·ùºÎ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¾Ð·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼öÄ¡¸ðÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ¼ö¸®¸ðÇü½ÇÇè °á°ú¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºñ±³ °á°ú, ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¼öÄ¡¸ðÀÇ °á°ú´Â ¼ö¸®¸ðÇü½ÇÇè °á°ú¸¦ Àß ÀçÇöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù ±×·¯³ª, °¨¼¼Áö¿¡¼­ÀÇ µµ¼öÇö»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼öÄ¡¸ðÀÇ °á°ú´Â °ø±â¿¬ÇàÈ¿°ú·Î ÀÎÇØ ¼ö¸®¸ðÇü½ÇÇè °á°ú¿Í ´Ù¼Ò Â÷À̰¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
This study on the HwaBuk Multipurpose Dam showed that two- and three- dimensional numerical model experiments, as well as hydraulic model experiments, can be useful analysis tools for engineers. A commercially available RMA2, which solves the shallow water equations, and FLOW-3D, which solves the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations, were used to simulate the hydraulic model setup. Numerical simulation results on the following were compared with the hydraulic model results: the flow in the reservoir basin and the approaching channel; the discharge in the overflow weir; the water surface profiles in the rollway, chute, and stilling basin; and the pressure distributions in the rollway. It was shown that there is a reasonably good agreement between the numerical model and the hydraulic model for the most of computations. There were, however, some differences between the numerical simulation results and hydraulic model results for the hydraulic jump in the stilling basin because of air entrainment effect.
 
Ű¿öµå
È­ºÏ´Ù¸ñÀû´ï;¼öÄ¡¸ðÇü;¼ö¸®¸ðÇü;HwaBuk Multipurpose Dam;numerical model;hydraulic model;RMA2;FLOW-3;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.38, no.3, 2005³â, pp.179-188
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200531234572175)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿