¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.30, no.6, 1997³â, pp.777-785
»êÁö »ç¸é¿¡¼­ Åä¾çü¿Í ´ë°ø±ØÀ» ÅëÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÁöÇ¥ÇÏ È£¿ì·ùÀÇ ¼ö¹®ÇÐÀû Ư¼º
( Hydrological Characteristics of Subsurface Stormflow through Soil Matrix and Macropores on forested Hillslopes )
±è°æÇÏ; »ê¸²¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸½Ç ¿¬±¸»ç;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â °­¿ì½Ã »êÁö»ç¸éÀÇÅä¾çü¿Í ´ë°ø±Ø¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÁöÇ¥ÇÏ È£¿ì·ù¸¦ ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ÈÄ À̵éÀÇ ¼ö¹®ÇÐÀû Ư¼ºÀ» ¹àÈ÷°íÀÚ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃøÁ¤ ½Ã¼³Àº ¹Ì±¹ Georgia ÁÖ¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÑ ÁöÁú±¹ »êÇÏ Panola ½ÃÇèÀ¯¿ªÀÇ »ó·ù »êÁö»ç¸é¿¡ ¾à 20m ±æÀÌÀÇ Á¶»ç±¸¸¦ ¾Ï¹Ý ±íÀ̱îÁö ÆÄ°í 2m °£°ÝÀ¸·Î Áý¼ö±¸¸¦ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ë°ø±Ø·ù´Â Á¶»ç±¸ Åä¾ç´Ü¸é¿¡ ÀÖ´Â 13°³ÀÇ ´ë°ø±Ø Áß À¯ÃâÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÑ 6°³ÀÇ ´ë°ø±Ø¿¡ Áý¼öÅëÀ» ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1996³â 3¿ù 6ÀϺÎÅÍ 7ÀϱîÁö 95.5mmÀÇ °­¿ì°¡ ³»·ÈÀ¸¸ç ÀÌ ¶§ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ´ë°ø±Ø·ù¿Í ±âÁú·ù¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ë°ø±¹·ù´Â ±âÁú·ùº¸´Ù ¾à 10½Ã°£ ¾Õ¼­ ÷µÎÀ¯ÃâÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇϹǷΠÀ¯¿ªÀÇ Ã·µÎÀ¯ÃâÀ» Çü¼ºÇϴµ¥ º¸´Ù Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃÆ´Ù. °­¿ì°¡ Á¾·áµÈ ÈÄ ´ë°ø±Ø·ù´Â ¾à 12½Ã°£ À̳»¿¡ ¸ØÃá ¹Ý¸é ±âÁú·ù´Â ¾à 3ÀÏ ÀÌ»ó Áö¼ÓµÇ¾î °¨¼öºÎ¸¦ Çü¼ºÇϴµ¥ º¸´Ù Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃÆ´Ù. ±âÁú·ç¿Í ´ë°ø±Ø·ùÀÇÀ¯Ãâ·®Àº Áý¼ö±¸¿¡ µû¶ó ÃÖ´ë 8,655.3$ell$¿¡¼­ ÃÖÃÊ 17.8$ell$·Î °ø°£Àû º¯À̰¡ ¸Å¿ì Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç ÀÌ º¯ÀÌ´Â ÁöÇ¥ ÁöÇüº¸´Ù ±â¹Ý¾Ï Ç¥¸éÀÇ ÁöÇü°ú ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
This study was conducted to clarify the hydrological characteristics of subsurface flow through a soil matrix and macropores. The research facility was set up in a 20m-1ong trench excavated down to bedrock at the base of a hillslope in the Panola catchment under USGS Georgia district. 13 macropores were found on the trench face and 6 major macropores were monitored. Matrix and macropore flow were measured during 95.5mm rainfall on March, 6 to 7. 1996. Macropore flow had great influence on formation of peak flow because the delivery time to Peak flow of macropore flow were faster about 10hrs than those of matrix flow. Matrix flow continued to recess for 3 days. On the other hand, macropore flow stopped within 12hrs after the event ceased. This means that matrix flow controls the recession part. The spatial variations of matrix and macropore flow between each trough and collector were very large by a wide range of 8,655.3 $ell$ to 17.8 $ell$ . The bed rock surface topography relates closer with the spatial variations of the flow than the surface one.
 
Ű¿öµå
»êÁö»ç¸é;ÁöÇ¥ÇÏ È£¿ì·ù;±âÁú·ù;´ë°ø±Ø·ù;forested hillslope;subsurface stormflow;matrix flow;macropore flow;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.30, no.6, 1997³â, pp.777-785
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199711920100719)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿