¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.31, no.3, 1998³â, pp.253-267
À¯¿ªÆ¯¼º º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ µµ½ÃÀ¯Ãâ¸ðÇüÀÇ ¸Å°³º¯¼ö ¹Î°¨µµºÐ¼®(II) -¸ðÇüÀÇ °ËÁ¤ ¹× Àû¿ë-
( The Sensitivity Analysis of Parameters of Urban Runoff Models due to Variations of Basin Characteristics (II) - Model Calibration and Application - )
¼­±Ô¿ì;ÇãÁØÇà; µ¿ÀÇ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇкÎ;¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â À¯¿ªÀÇ Å©±â¿Í Çü»ó ¹× µµ½ÃÈ­ Á¤µµ°¡ ´Ù¸¥ µ¿¼öõÀ¯¿ª°ú ¹«½ÉõÀÇ Ã»ÁÖ ½ÃÇèÀ¯¿ª, µÎ °÷À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ILLUDAS ¸ðÇü°ú SWMM ¸ðÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÑ À¯ÃâÆ¯¼ºÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î °¢ ¸Å°³º¯¼öÀÇ ¹Î°£µµ Á¤µµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÑ À¯Ãâ·®ºñ´Â ¼±Á¤ ¸Å°³º¯¼ö ´ëºÎºÐ °­¿ìÁö¼Ó±â°£°ú À¯¿ª¸éÀûÅ©±â¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç °­¿ìÀÇ ½Ã°£Àû ºÐÆ÷Çüº¯È­¿¡´Â °ü°è¼ºÀÌ ¾àÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÷µÎÀ¯Ãâ·®ºñ´Â ILLUDAS ¸ðÇü¿¡¼­´Â ħÅõ´É°ú ¸Å°³º¯¼ö ¸ðµÎ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ °ü°è¼ºÀ» °®°í ¼±Çüº¯È­ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. À¯Ãâ¹Î°¨µµºñ´Â 1 ÀÌÇÏÀÇ °ªÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ÷µÎÀ¯Ãâ·®º¸´Ù ÃÑÀ¯Ãâ·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Î°¨µµ ¿µÇâÀÌ ´õ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú°í, SWMM ¸ðÇüÀÇ Á¶µµ°è¼ö À¯Ãâ¹Î°¨µµºñ´Â °ÅÀÇ 1ÀÇ °ªÀ» °®´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. Àû¿ë¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ ¼±Á¤µÈ ÁÖ¿ä ¸Å°³º¯¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇØ À¯¿ª¸éÀûÅ©±âº°, 60,120,180ºÐ °­¿ìÁö¼Ó±â°£º°°ú HuffÀÇ 4ºÐÀ§Çüº°·Î ÃÑÀ¯Ãâ·®ºñ, ÷µÎÀ¯Ãâ·®ºñ, À¯Ãâ¹Î°¨µµºñ¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿© µµ½ÃÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´°í ¹Î°¨µµºñÀ² °á°ú¸¦ Ç¥·Î Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
In this study, ILLUDAS and SWMM were applied for Dongsucheon basin, Incheon and Test basin, Cheongju. The main parameters (II, IA, IS, SI, SR, SS) which are included in those of each model depending on runoff results were determined, and sensitivity ratios were estimated in order to evaluate and compare the characteristics of each modEL. Total runoff ratio for almost parameters turned out to have a linear relation to the rainfall durations and the scale of basin area but have nothing to do with rainfall distributions. Sensitivity ratios turned out to have a linear relation for the infiltration and soil parameters of ILLUDAS as well as all parameters of SWMM. ronoff sensitivity ratios for almost parameters were smaller than 1.0 because the impacts of total runoff were bigger than those of peak runoff. And runoff sensitivity ratio was equal to 1.0 for the roughness coefficient of SWMM. Total runoff ratio, peak runoff ratio and runoff sensitivity ratio for the selected parameters of those models were presented asthe tables and figures according to the scale of basin area, rainfall durations such as 60, 120, and 180 minutes and Huff's 4th quartiles rainfall distributions. Keywords : ILLUDAS, SWMM, parameter, sensitivity analysis, sensitivity ratio.
 
Ű¿öµå
ILLUDAS ¸ðÇü;SWMM ¸ðÇü;¸Å°³º¯¼ö;¹Î°¨µµºÐ¼®;¹Î°¨µµºñÀ²;ILLUDAS;SWMM;parameter;sensitivity analysis;sensitivity ratio;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.31, no.3, 1998³â, pp.253-267
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199811920100956)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿