¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.33, no.4, 2000³â, pp.461-469
°³¼ö·Î¿¡¼­ ¼ÒÀ¯»çÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ºÎÀ¯ÀÔÀÚ À¯µ¿¿¡ °üÇÑ ¼öÄ¡Àû ¿¬±¸
( A Numerical Analysis of Sediment-laden Flow in Open Channel with Bed-load Effect )
À±ÁØ¿ë;°­½Â±Ô;°­½Ãȯ; ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °øÇдëÇÐ ±â°è»ê¾÷°øÇкÎ;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ±â°è°øÇаú;Çѱ¹Çؾ翬±¸¼Ò ¿¬¾È¡¤Ç׸¸°øÇבּ¸¼¾ÅÍ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ºÎÀ¯ÀÔÀÚ¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â À¯µ¿À» ÀÔÀÚÅ©±â¿Í ÀÔÀÚ·®À» ´Þ¸®ÇÑ ¸î °¡Áö °æ¿ì¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¼öÄ¡ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇØ¼®Çϰí Coleman(1981, 1986)ÀÇ ½ÇÇè°á°ú¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ÏÀü ³­·ù À¯µ¿ÀåÀ» ÇØ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© k-$omega$³­·ù¸ðÇüÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ³óµµÀå ÇØ¼®À» À§Çؼ­´Â ħ°­¼Óµµ¸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ ÀϹÝÈ­µÈ ³óµµ¹æÁ¤½ÄÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯µ¿°ú ÀÔÀÚÀÇ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ëÀº Einstein°ú Chien(1955)ÀÇ ¸ðÇüÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ¼öÄ¡°è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ´ëºÎºÐ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¼ÒÀ¯»çÀÇ µÎ²²¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ¿¬±¸¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ÀÔÀÚ·®ÀÌ ¸¹¾ÆÁö°Å³ª ÀÔÀÚÅ©±â°¡ Ŭ °æ¿ì À̸¦ ¹«½ÃÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¹àÇôÁ³´Ù. ¼ÒÀ¯»çÀÇ µÎ²²¿Í ÇÏ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â È¿°ú¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿© º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥, ¿©±â¼­ ³óµµºÐÆ÷¸¦ °áÁ¤Áþ°Ô µÇ´Â $eta$°ªÀÌ ÀÔÀÚÀÇ Å©±â¿Í ÀÔÀÚ·®¿¡ °ü·ÃµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù´Â »ç½ÇÀ» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ±âÁ¸ ¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â $eta$°¡ 1.0º¸´Ù Å« °ªÀ» °¡Áø´Ù°í º¸°íµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ 1.0º¸´Ù ÀÛ¾ÆÁú¼ö ÀÖÀ½ÀÌ È®ÀεǾú°í, ÀÌ´Â ÃÖ±Ù¿¡ º¸°íµÈ ¿¬±¸ °á°ú¿Í ÀÏÄ¡µÇ´Â °á°úÀÌ´Ù.
An numerical analysis of sediment-laden flow is carried out, and results are compared with the experiments of Coleman(1981, 1986) that included the several cases varying sediment size and quantity in open channel flow. K-$omega$ turbulence model is selected for the fully turbulent flow field, and the concentration equation considering the fall velocity is adopted for the concentration field. The model of Einstein and Chien(1955) is applied to couple the velocity field and the concentration field. Most of researches have been carried out without considering the bed-load thickness, but it is found that the bed-load thickness cannot be ignored in case of a large amount of sediment or a large size of it. The bed-load thickness and surface roughness are considered in this study. Here, $eta$ value, which is defined by the reciprocal of turbulent Schmidt number and is related with the concentration profile, is found to be varied according to the sediment size and quantity. Even though most of researchers have insisted that $eta$ had always larger than 1.0, it may be concluded that $eta$ can have smaller value than 1.0, that is coincident with the report of recent research.
 
Ű¿öµå
ºÎÀ¯ÀÔÀÚ;°³¼ö·Î À¯µ¿;³óµµ¹æÁ¤½Ä;k-$omega$³­·ù¸ðÇü;¼ÒÀ¯»çÀÇ ¿µÇâ;suspended sediment;open channel flow;concentration equation equation;k-$omega$ turbulence model;bed-load effect;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.33, no.4, 2000³â, pp.461-469
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200011920063821)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿