¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.10, no.1, 2009³â, pp.114-125
½Å·Ú¼º ÇØ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ±³·®±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ¼³°èVA±â¹ý ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Design Value Analysis Methodology for Bridge Structure Using Reliability Analysis )
±è¼ºÀÏ;À̱¤¸ð;ÃÖ¼®¿ø;Á¤ÁØÈ­;±è¼ºÀÏ; (ÁÖ)¿¡½º¾ÆÀÌ¿¥Ç÷£;(ÁÖ)»õ´ÃÀ¯ºñ¾ÆÀÌ;(ÁÖ)»õ´ÃÀ¯ºñ¾ÆÀÌ ¹ÎÀÚ»ç¾÷ºÎ;(ÁÖ)»õ´ÃÀ¯ºñ¾ÆÀÌ VE»ç¾÷ºÎ;(ÁÖ)¿¡½º¾ÆÀÌ¿¥Ç÷£ ¹ÎÀÚ»ç¾÷ºÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â È®·üÀû LCC ¹× È®·üÀû ¼º´ÉÆò°¡¸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ ¼³°è VAºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ½Å·Ú¼º ÇØ¼®ÀÇ °³³äÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ½Å·Úµµ¸¦ È®º¸ÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» Áö¿øÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ó±â¿Í °°Àº ¸ñÀû°ú ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó ÁøÇàµÈ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù: 1) ±â´ÉÁ¤Àǰ¡ ¿Ï·áµÈ ÀÌÈÄ µµÃâµÈ ´ë¾ÈµéÀÇ ´ë¾ÈÆò°¡½Ã ½Å·Ú¼º ÀÖ´Â ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÏ¿© °³¼±µÈ ¼³°èVA ÀýÂ÷ ¿Í °¡Ä¡»óÅÂÇÔ¼ö¸¦ Á¤½ÄÈ­ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¡Ä¡Æò°¡ÀýÂ÷¿¡¼­ÀÇ Àϰü¼º ¹× È¿À²¼ºÀ» È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2) ±³·®ÀÇ LCCºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ DB¸¦ ¼öÁý ¹× ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚ·áÀÇ ¼öÁý¹üÀ§´Â ±âÁ¸¿¡ ¼öÇàµÈ ±³·®ÀÇ LCCºÐ¼® ¿¬±¸ ¹®ÇåÀ» ±âÃÊ·Î ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ºÐ¼®°á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å·Úµµ È®º¸ ¹× ¼öÁýµÈ ÀÚ·áÀÇ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼º 󸮸¦ À§ÇØ MCS ±â¹ýÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3) ´ë¾Èº° ¼º´ÉÆò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ °¡ÁßÄ¡ ¹× Æò°¡µî±Þ°ú LCC ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ LCC ºÐ¼®¸ðµ¨, ºÐ¼®±â°£, ÇÒÀÎÀ², »ç¿ëÀÚºñ¿ë, ¾ÈÀüÁ¡°Ë ¹× ¾ÈÀüÁø´Üºñ¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶°ÇÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³¡À¸·Î, »ç·Ê´ë»óÀÎ "OO´ë±³ ¹× ¿¬°áµµ·Î °Ç¼³°ø»ç ½Ç½Ã¼³°è" ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ VA¼öÇà »ç·Ê¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î Ÿ´ç¼ºÀ» °ËÅäÇÏ°í °á·ÐÀ» µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù.
In this study, a design value analysis technique that considered stochastic LCC and stochastic performance evaluation was proposed, and by introducing the concept of reliability analysis, a decision making that secured reliability was supported. The results of this study, which was carried out according to the above objectives and methods, are summarized as follows: 1) The design value analysis procedures and value state function, improved in order to carry out a reliable analysis when evaluating alternate proposals that were extracted after the function definition was complete, were formalized, and in order to secure consistency and efficiency for value evaluation procedures, an evaluation index scheme was proposed; 2) Database collection and analysis were done for a bridge's LCC analysis. As for the collection scope of data, literature of previous research done on a bridge's LCC analysis was used as the basis for analysis, and for securing reliability regarding analysis results and dealing with uncertainty of collected data, the MCS technique was applied; 3) Weights and evaluation ranks for performance evaluation of each of the alternate proposals, as well as LCC analysis model, analysis period, discount rate, user expense, safety inspection and safety diagnosis expense conditions for LCC analysis were proposed. Lastly, a feasibility study was done and conclusion was made about "OO grand bridge and connecting road construction work execution design" project centered on value analysis execution case.
 
Ű¿öµå
°¡Ä¡°øÇÐ;±âÄ¡ºÐ¼®;»ý¾ÖÁÖ±âºñ¿ë;½Å·Ú¼ºÇؼ®;Value Engineering;Value Engineering analysis;Life Cycle Cost;Reliability Analysis;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.10, no.1, 2009³â, pp.114-125
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200912651521523)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿