¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.39, no.12, 2006³â, pp.997-1012
ºñ¼±Çü ÀÚ±âȸ±Í¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ³²¹æÁøµ¿Áö¼ö ½Ã°è¿­ ºÐ¼®
( Nonlinear Autoregressive Modeling of Southern Oscillation Index )
±ÇÇöÇÑ;¹®¿µÀÏ; ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Á¶°ÇºÎ ÇٹеµÇÔ¼ö¿Í CAFPE(Corrected Asymptotic Final Prediction Error) Â÷¼ö°áÁ¤ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ ºñ¸Å°³º¯¼öÀû ºñ¼±Çü ÀÚ±âȸ±Í (Nonlinear AutoRegressive, NAR) ¸ðÇüÀ» ¼Ò°³Çϰí À̸¦ SOI(Southern Oscillation Index)¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. SOI ÀÚ·á¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ ¼±Çü AR ¸ðÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸³ª ÀÜÂ÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ËÁ¤°á°ú À̺л꼺(heteroscedasticity)À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ BDS(Brock-Dechert-Sheinkman) °ËÁ¤¿¡¼­ ºñ¼±Çü¼ºÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÔÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ NAR ¸ðÇü¿¡ SOI ÀڷḦ Àû¿ë½ÃÄ×´Ù. CAFPE¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î Áöü 1, 2¿Í 4°¡ ¼±ÅõǾúÀ¸¸ç Á¶°ÇºÎ Æò±ÕÇÔ¼ö¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿© SOI ÀڷḦ ¸ðÀÇÇÑ °á°ú ÀÜÂ÷¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ Á¤±Ô¼º°ú À̺л꼺 °¡Á¤ÀÌ Jarque-Bera °ËÁ¤°ú ARCH-LM °ËÁ¤¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ ±â°¢µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ¶ÇÇÑ Á¶°ÇºÎ Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷ÇÔ¼öÀÇ ÃÖÀû Â÷¼ö·Î 3, 8°ú 9°¡ CAPFE¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼±ÅõǾú´Ù. Á¶°ÇºÎ Æò±ÕÇÔ¼ö¿Í Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷ÇÔ¼ö¸¦ ¸ðµÎ °í·ÁÇÑ ¸ðÇü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÜÂ÷ °ËÁ¤ °á°ú ÀÜÂ÷ÀÇ I.I.D °¡Á¤À» ¸¸Á·ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ƯÈ÷, BDS °ËÁ¤¿¡¼­ ½Å·Ú±¸°£ 95%¿Í 99%¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ ¸¸Á·ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ÀüüÀÇ 15%¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â SOI ÀÚ·á¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ One-Step ¿¹ÃøÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¼±Çü ¸ðÇü¿¡ ºñÇØ Æò±ÕÁ¦°ö¿¹Ãø¿ÀÂ÷°¡ 7% Àû°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, NAR ¸ðÇüÀº ¿©Å¸ÀÇ ¸Å°³º¯¼öÀû ¹æ¹ý°ú ´Þ¸® ¸ðÇü ¼±Åÿ¡ ÀÖ¾î ÀÚÀ¯·Î¿ì¸ç ºñ¼±Çü¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î¼­ SOI ÀÚ·á¿Í °°Àº ºñ¼±Çü ÀڷḦ À§ÇÑ ¸ðÀǹæ¹ýÀ¸·Î ¼±Çü ¸ðÇü¿¡ ºñÇØ ¸¹Àº ÀåÁ¡À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Ù.
We have presented a nonparametric stochastic approach for the SOI(Southern Oscillation Index) series that used nonlinear methodology called Nonlinear AutoRegressive(NAR) based on conditional kernel density function and CAFPE(Corrected Asymptotic Final Prediction Error) lag selection. The fitted linear AR model represents heteroscedasticity, and besides, a BDS(Brock - Dechert - Sheinkman) statistics is rejected. Hence, we applied NAR model to the SOI series. We can identify the lags 1, 2 and 4 are appropriate one, and estimated conditional mean function. There is no autocorrelation of residuals in the Portmanteau Test. However, the null hypothesis of normality and no heteroscedasticity is rejected in the Jarque-Bera Test and ARCH-LM Test, respectively. Moreover, the lag selection for conditional standard deviation function with CAFPE provides lags 3, 8 and 9. As the results of conditional standard deviation analysis, all I.I.D assumptions of the residuals are accepted. Particularly, the BDS statistics is accepted at the 95% and 99% significance level. Finally, we split the SOI set into a sample for estimating themodel and a sample for out-of-sample prediction, that is, we conduct the one-step ahead forecasts for the last 97 values (15%). The NAR model shows a MSEP of 0.5464 that is 7% lower than those of the linear model. Hence, the relevance of the NAR model may be proved in these results, and the nonparametric NAR model is encouraging rather than a linear one to reflect the nonlinearity of SOI series.
 
Ű¿öµå
ºñ¼±Çü ÀÚ±âȸ±Í¸ðÇü;³²¹æÁøµ¿Áö¼ö;ÀÜÂ÷ °ËÁ¤;Áöü½Ã°£;Nonlinear Autoregressive;SOI series;Residual Test;Lag Time;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.39, no.12, 2006³â, pp.997-1012
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200606141782230)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿