|
|
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.39, no.1, 2006³â, pp.59-68
|
¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º Æò°¡ Áö¼ö °³¹ß°ú ±¸¼º ¿ä¼ÒÀÇ Á߿䵵 Æò°¡
( Development of Assessment Index for Water Resources Sustainability and Weights Evaluation of It's Components ) |
| °¹Î±¸;À̱¤¸¸; Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ¼öÀÚ¿ø ÀÌ¿ë°ú °ü¸®¸¦ À§Çؼ´Â À¯¿ª ³»¿¡¼ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ¼öÀÚ¿ø°ú °ü·ÃµÈ Ȱµ¿µéÀÌ Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ °³¹ßÀÇ °³³ä¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´ÂÁö ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ÆÇ´ÜÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦ À§Çؼ´Â À¯¿ªÀÇ ¼öÀÚ¿ø ÀÌ¿ë°ú °ü¸®¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¼ö¹®, ¼öÁú, »çȸ, °æÁ¦ ¹× ȯ°æ ¿äÀÎÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ Æò°¡Áö¼ö°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÁöÇ¥µéÀ» ¼±Á¤Çϰí À̵éÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÑ ¼öÀÚ¿ø Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º Áö¼ö(Water Resources Sustainability Index, WRSI)¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. WRSI¸¦ ±¸¼ºÇÏ´Â ±¸¼º¿ä¼ÒÀÇ Á߿䵵(Weight)´Â °èÃþÀû ºÐ¼®±â¹ý(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© °áÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù ¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼ºÀ» ¼¼ºÎÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© WRSI¸¦ °æÁ¦Àû È¿À²¼º, »çȸÀû °øÆò¼º, ȯ°æÀû º¸Àü¼º, À¯Áö°ü¸®´É·Â µî 4°³ ¼¼ºÎ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼¼ºÎÁö¼öÀÇ ±¸¼º ÁöÇ¥´Â À¯¿ªÁ¶»ç, »çȸ ¹× °æÁ¦ Åë°è, ¿©·ÐÁ¶»ç ¹× °ü·ÃµÈ ¼±Çà ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϰí ÀûÇÕ¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÑ ÈÄ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. WRSI ±¸¼º¿ä¼ÒµéÀÇ Á߿䵵´Â 127¸íÀÇ Àü¹®°¡µéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© °áÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼¼ºÎÁö¼ö¿Í ±¸¼º ÁöÇ¥ÀÇ Á߿䵵 ºÐ¼®°á°ú´Â ¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ ÀÌ¿ëÀ» À§Çؼ ¼öÀÚ¿ø ÀÌ¿ëÀÇ È¿À²¼º°ú °øÆò¼º Áõ´ë, ÇÏõ ¼öÁúÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃÄÑ Ä£¼ö ±â´ÉÀÇ º¹¿øÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¼öÀÚ¿ø ºÐ¾ß¿¡ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÀûÁ¤ Àç¿øÀÇ ÅõÀÔÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, ¼öÀÚ¿ø Á¤Ã¥ °áÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁֹεéÀÇ Âü¿©°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. |
|
| To assess the water resources sustainability, many indicators and methodologies have been suggested by international organizations and developed in other countries. However, in the previous studies, some of indicators were unsuitable for assessing the sustainability of water use and management in Korea. Thus, in this study nSl(Water Resources Sustainability Index), a multi-variable index, was created by consideration of environmental, social, and economical criteria. Relative weights for components, indicators and sub-indexes, were determined by employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In order to extract the indicators related with water resources sustainability, the data related with water resources and indicators suggested in various field were compared and thoroughly reviewed. These indicators were classified into four groups; Economic Efficiency Index, Social Equity Index, Environmental Conservation Index, and Maintenance Capability Index. The weight of each component were decided by the survey of 127 specialists in water resources and sustainability. The result of survey represented that efficiency and equity of water use and water quality for river restoration are major issues in enhancing the water resources sustainability In addition, it was found that investment and public participation should be considered for sustainable water use. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º;¼öÀÚ¿ø;ÁöÇ¥;Áö¼ö;Á߿䵵;Sustainability;Water resources;Indicator;Index;Relative weight;Analytic Hierarchy Process; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.39, no.1, 2006³â, pp.59-68
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200612842600060)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|