¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.9, no.6, 2008³â, pp.137-146
°èÃþÈ­ºÐ¼®¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ BTO ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷ Çù»óÀÇ ÁÖ¿äÀïÁ¡ Ư¼ººÐ¼®¿¡ °üÇÑ °íÂû
( A Study on Characteristic Analysis of Major Issues in Negotiating Concession Agreement for BTO Projects Using AHP )
³ëÅÂÈ£;±èÁ¾¿ø;ÀÓâ½Ä;ÀÌÁ¾Ãâ; ºÎ°æ´ëÇб³ °øÇבּ¸¼Ò;ºÎ»êµµ½Ã°ø»ç;ºÎ°æ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °Ç¼³°ü¸®°øÇÐÇùµ¿°úÁ¤;ºÎ°æ´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
BTO ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Ç½ÃÇù¾àü°á Çù»ó½Ã ÁÖ¹«°üûÀ̳ª »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ ¸ðµÎ ¸¹Àº Á¦¾à°ú ¸®½ºÅ©¸¦ °¡Áö°í Çù»óÇÏ°Ô µÇ¸ç, Çù»ó °á°ú¿¡ µû¶ó »ç¾÷ÀÇ ¼ºÆÐ¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ Çù»ó ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ Á» ´õ È¿°úÀûÀÎ Çù»ó°ú °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò±â À§ÇÏ¿© Çù»ó½Ã °¡Àå ÁÖ¿äÇÑ ÀïÁ¡µéÀ» ÃßÃâÇϰí, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÁÖ¿äÀïÁ¡µéÀÌ »óÈ£°£¿¡ ¾î¶² Ư¼ºÀ» ³»Æ÷ÇÏ´ÂÁö¸¦ Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®¹æ¹ýÀº ¹®Ç忬±¸, ¿¬±¸ º¸°í¼­ µî°ú Àü¹®°¡µéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¹ßÁÖû, ¼³°è»ç, ½Ã°ø»ç ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´°í Likert ôµµ, ANOVA ºÐ¼®, AHP ºÐ¼® µîÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© ÁÖ¿äÀïÁ¡µéÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú ÁÖ¿äÀïÁ¡µéÀº °ø»çºñ »êÁ¤, ¼öÀÍ·ü, Á¤ºÎÀçÁ¤Áö¿ø, »ç¿ë·á ¼öÀÔº¸Àå¼öÁØ, ¿î¿µºñ »êÁ¤, »ç¿ë·á µîÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ ±×·ìº°·Î 6°³ Ç׸ñµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó´ëÀû Á߿䵵, ¸®½ºÅ©¸¦ ´À³¢´Â »ó´ëÀû Å©±â, Ç׸ñ°£ÀÇ °´°üÀû ÀÚ·á Á¦½ÃÀÇ ¾î·Á¿î Á¤µµ µîÀÌ Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¼³°è»ç ±×·ì°ú ½Ã°ø»ç ±×·ìÀº ´Ù¼Ò À¯»ç¼ºÀ» °®°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ¹ßÁÖû ±×·ìÀº ¼³°è»ç ±×·ì ¶Ç´Â ½Ã°ø»ç ±×·ì°úÀÇ À¯»ç¼ºÀÌ ÀûÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇâÈÄ ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷Àº °è¼Ó Áõ°¡µÉ Àü¸ÁÀ̹ǷΠº» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦½ÃµÈ ³»¿ëµéÀº ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ Çù»ó¿¡ µµ¿ò ¹× ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷ Ȱ¼ºÈ­¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÈ´Ù.
Both competent authorities and private entrepreneurs face plenty of risks when negotiating BTO(Build Transfer Operation) methods of PPI(Private Participations in Infrastructures) projects. Also, success and failure of projects largely depend on the concession agreement contract. In this study, for more efficient negotiation, major issues are examined, and quantitatively analyzed to find out not only the relationship but also the characteristics of which these issues share. Questionnaire research was conducted through both research and by experts who were divided into an ordering agency, design company and constructor. Characteristics of major issues were quantitatively analyzed using the Likert index method, ANOVA(ANalysis of VAriance) and AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis. Case studies were examined in order to estimate construction cost, rates of return, government finance support, level of operation-revenues guarantees, estimating operational costs and usage fees. With these 6 items, relative priority, relative impression which is sensible to risk and extent of difficulty in presenting data which is objective were quantitatively analyzed by the ordering agency, design company and constructor groups. From the analysis, there were some similarities between the design company and constructor groups while there was less of similarities between the ordering agency and design company or constructor. The government is diversifying the methods of project promotion, and PPI project from infrastructure-centered to public culture facilities are being expand. The current study will provide not only supporting efficient negotiation but also revitalizing PPI projects.
 
Ű¿öµå
¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷;ÁÖ¿äÀïÁ¡;°èÃþºÐ¼®°úÁ¤;ºÐ»êºÐ¼®;PPI;BTO;Major issue;AHP;ANOVA;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.9, no.6, 2008³â, pp.137-146
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200811237158572)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿