|
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.39, no.9, 2006³â, pp.779-786
|
Huff °¿ì½Ã°£ºÐÆ÷¹æ¹ýÀÇ °³¼±¹æ¾È ¿¬±¸ : II. Huff ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °³¼±¹æ¾È
( A Study on the Improvement of Huff's Method for Applying in Korea : II. Improvement of Huff's Method ) |
Àå¼öÇü;À±À翵;À±¿ë³²; °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¹æÀç°úÇбâ¼ú¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;°í·Á´ëÇб³ °úÇбâ¼ú´ëÇРȯ°æ½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇаú;¢ß»ï¾È ¼öÀÚ¿øºÎ;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â Huff(1967) ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ±¹³»À¯¿ª Àû¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ¸·Î¼ À¯¿ª³» ¿Ü °üÃø¼ÒÀÇ °¿ì»ç»óº°·Î Á¡¿ì·® 25.4mmÀÌ»ó°ú ¸éÀûÆò±Õ¿ì·® 12.7mmÀÌ»óÀÇ ÀڷḦ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ºÐ¼®°á°ú °¿ìÁö¼Ó±â°£ µî±Þº° ÃÖºóºÐÀ§ÀÇ ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ ¸éÀûÆò±Õ¿ì·®°ú °°Àº ºÐÀ§°¡ ¼±ÅõǾî À¯¿ªÀÇ ´ëÇ¥¼ºÀ» °®´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. °Ç¼³±³ÅëºÎ(2000) Huff ¹æ¹ý°ú º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ½Ã°£ºÐÆ÷ ½ÃŲ °á°ú Áö¼Ó±â°£º° ÷µÎ°¿ì°µµÀÇ Å©±â´Â º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »êÁ¤µÈ °ªÀÌ ÄÇÀ¸³ª, Áö¼Ó±â°£¿¡ µû¶ó ÀϰüµÈ °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»Áö´Â ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. Àü¼úÇÑ µÎ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½Ã°£ºÐÆ÷ ½ÃŲ Áö¼Ó±â°£º° È®·ü°¿ì·®À» ÀÔ·ÂÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© À¯ÀÔ¼ö¹®°î¼±À» ¸ðÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÷µÎ°¿ì°µµÀÇ °æ¿ì¿Í´Â ´Þ¸® Áö¼Ó±â°£º° ÷µÎÈ«¼ö·®ÀÇ °ªÀº Áö¼Ó±â°£ 12½Ã°£À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î Áö¼Ó±â°£ÀÌ Áõ°¡µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó µÎ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ªÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ Ä¿Á³´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ÀÓ°èÁö¼Ó±â°£À» °í·ÁÇÑ Ã·µÎÈ«¼ö·®¿¡¼ Å« Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â Áö¼Ó±â°£º° ÷µÎÈ«¼ö·® Â÷ÀÌ¿¡¼µµ À¯»çÇÑ Æ¯¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ Á¦½ÃÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀº Áö¼Ó±â°£¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ÇϳªÀÇ ´©°¡°î¼±À» ÀÌ¿ëÇØ¿Ô´ø ±âÁ¸¹æ¹ý¿¡¼ Å»ÇÇÇØ Áö¼Ó±â°£º°·Î ´©°¡°î¼±À» ±¸ºÐÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Áö¼Ó±â°£º° °¿ìÀÇ ½Ã°£ºÐÆ÷ Ư¼º°ú À¯¿ªÀÇ ´ëÇ¥¼ºÀ» °®´Â ¹«Â÷¿ø ´©°¡°î¼± ÀÛ¼º¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î È¿°úÀûÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
In this study, we propose a new method that utilizes rainfall data in and out of a basin, which is greater than 25.4mm for point rainfall or 12.7mm for areal mean rainfall respectively. From our analysis, most frequent quartile for point and areal mean rainfall were found to be the same in general for various rainfall duration intervals. From an evaluation of design rainfall per each rainfall duration distributed in time by the MOCT(Ministry of Construction and Transportation) version of Huff's method and this study, peak rainfall intensity by this study was found to be greater than the one by MOCT, but there were no consistent increase or decrease of this difference with rainfall durations. Using the distributed design rainfall per each duration by MOCT and this study, corresponding flood inflow hydrographs were simulated and compared each other. Contrary to the case of peak rainfall intensity, difference in peak flow by both methods per each rainfall duration started to increase from about 12-hr duration. Especially, the difference in peak flow was significant when critical rainfall duration was considered, and this trend was similar for peak flows of other rainfall durations. Therefore, the method proposed in this study is thought to be the effective procedure for the construction of dimensionless cumulative rainfall curve that is representative of a basin while considering time distribution characteristics for different rainfall durations. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
Huff ¹æ¹ý;°¿ìÀÇ ½Ã°£ºÐÆ÷Ư¼º;´ëÇ¥´©°¡¿ì·®°î¼±;÷µÎÈ«¼ö;Huff' method;rainfall time distribution characteristics;representative rainfall mass curve;peak flood; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.39, no.9, 2006³â, pp.779-786
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200634741700377)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|