¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.40, no.10, 2007³â, pp.801-810
ÇöÀå½ÇÃø¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Á¶µµ°è¼ö »êÁ¤ÀÇ ºÒÈ®½Çµµ Æò°¡
( Uncertainty Analysis in Estimation of Roughness Coefficient Using the Field Measurement Data )
±èÁö¼º;ÀÌÂùÁÖ;±è¿ø; Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ÇÏõ.ÇØ¾È¿¬±¸½Ç;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ÇÏõ.ÇØ¾È¿¬±¸½Ç;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ÇÏõ.ÇØ¾È¿¬±¸½Ç;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ ½ÇÃøµÈ À¯·® ¹× ¼öÀ§·ÎºÎÅÍ »êÁ¤µÈ Á¶µµ°è¼öÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í ±× Å¸´ç¼º°ú ÇѰ踦 °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚ¿¬ ÇÏõÈ帧À» µî·ù·Î °¡Á¤ÇÏ¿© »êÁ¤µÈ Á¶µµ°è¼ö´Â ÀúÀ¯·® ±Ô¸ð¿¡¼­ ºÎµî·ù·Î °è»êµÈ Á¶µµ°è¼ö¿Í Å« Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â ¼Óµµ¼öµÎÀÇ Â÷À̺¸´Ù Æò±Õ ´Ü¸éÀû, µ¿¼ö¹Ý°æ µî ´Ü¸éÁ¤º¸¿¡ Å©°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ±ä ±¸°£¿¡¼­ È«¼ö·® ±Ô¸ðÀÇ Æò±Õ Á¶µµ°è¼ö »êÁ¤¿¡¼­´Â ±¸°£ »óÇÏ·ù¸¸ÀÇ ¼öÀ§ ÀڷḦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¶µµ°è¼ö¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ¼öÁ¤ Newton-Raphson ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ±¸°£ ³» ´Ù¼öÀÇ ½ÇÃø ¼öÀ§·Î »êÁ¤µÈ Æò±Õ Á¶µµ°è¼ö¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© È¿À²ÀûÀ̰í Á¤È®ÇÑ ÇØ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇöÀå ½ÇÃøÀ¸·Î Á¶µµ°è¼ö¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÒ °æ¿ì, ¼öÀ§ ¹× À¯·® ÃøÁ¤¿ÀÂ÷·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© È«¼ö±âº¸´Ù ÀúÀ¯·® ±Ô¸ð¿¡¼­ »êÁ¤µÈ Á¶µµ°è¼öÀÇ ºÒÈ®½Çµµ°¡ Áõ°¡µÇÁö¸¸ ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â ¼ö½É ¹× À¯¼ÓÀÇ ºÒÈ®½Çµµ´Â À¯·®±Ô¸ð¿Í ¹«°üÇÏ°Ô 5% ³»¿ÜÀÇ À¯»çÇÑ °á°ú°¡ ³ªÅ¸³²À¸·Î½á ½ÇÃø ¼öÀ§¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á¶µµ°è¼ö »êÁ¤ÀÇ Å¸´ç¼ºÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.
In this study, validity and limitation of the estimation of roughness coefficient using the measured field data are investigated and the errors of the calculated roughness coefficient are analyzed. The assumption of uniform flow led to much difference of the computed results in low flow, and this is due to change of the cross-section informations such as flow area and hydraulic radius rather than the difference of velocity head. From the comparison between the estimations of average roughness coefficient in the reach which is relatively long, the calculation using the modified Newton-Raphson method is very efficient and accurate. In the measured roughness coefficient, the errors of measured flow and stage are included and the lower flow is, the larger the magnitude of error of measured roughness coefficient is. But the error of depth and velocity associated with uncertainty of roughness coefficient is less than about 5% in the both of low and high flow, and it shows the validity of measured roughness coefficient.
 
Ű¿öµå
Á¶µµ°è¼ö;ºÒÈ®½Çµµ;ÇöÀåÀÚ·á;¼öÁ¤ Newton-Raphson ±â¹ý;roughness coefficient;uncertainty;field data;modified Newton-Raphson method;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.40, no.10, 2007³â, pp.801-810
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200735822476565)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿