|
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.35, no.5, 2002³â, pp.525-539
|
¿ë´ã´ïÀÇ ¿µÇâºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ ±Ý°ÀÇ ¼öÁú¸ðµ¨¸µ
( Water Quality Modelling of the Keum River - Effect of Yongdam Dam ) |
ÀÌÀºÇü;¼µ¿ÀÏ; Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°øÇаú;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
¿ë´ã´ïÀÇ °Ç¼³¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹æ·ùÁ¶°ÇÀÇ º¯È°¡ ´ëûȣÀÇ À¯ÀÔ¼öÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© WASP5 ¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© BOD, ÃÑÀÎ ±×¸®°í ÃÑÁú¼Ò ³óµµ¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÁú ¿¹Ãø ½Ã³ª¸®¿À´Â Å©°Ô ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ¼¼ °¡Áö·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´´Ù; ù°, ±Ý°ÀÇ À¯·®ÀÌ ´ëû´ïÀÇ ¿î¿µÀÌ ½ÃÀÛµÈ ÀÌ·¡ ÃÖ´ë °¥¼ö³â(1994)°ú ÃÖ´ë dz¼ö³â(1987)°ú °°´Ù°í º¸´Â µÎ °¡Áö Á¶°Ç, µÑ° ¿ë´ã´ï¿¡¼ ¹æ·ùµÇ´Â À¯·®À» ¿¬±¸±â°£ Áß(1998³â) ½ÇÃøµÈ À¯·®°ú °°´Ù°í º¸´Â °æ¿ì¿Í ¿ë´ã´ï ¹æ·ù °èȹ¾È¿¡ µû¶ó °¢°¢ 5.4, 8.9, 12.4, 16.4 §©/s·Î ¹æ·ùµÇ´Â °æ¿ì µî ´Ù¼¸ °¡Áö À¯·®Á¶°Ç, ¼Â°, ¿ë´ãÈ£¿¡¼ ¹æ·ùµÇ´Â ¼öÁúÀÌ 1998³â¿¡ ½ÇÃøµÈ ¼öÁØÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿Í ¿ì¸® ³ª¶ó ¼öÁú±âÁØÀ¸·Î 1±Þ¼ö¿Í 2±Þ¼ö¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ´Â °æ¿ì µî ¼¼ °¡Áö ¼öÁú Á¶°Ç. ¼öÁú ¿¹Ãø °á°ú ¿ë´ã´ïÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ ¹æ·ù·®ÀÇ º¯È´Â ±Ý°ÀÇ ¼öÁú°ú ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ °ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç ±Ý°ÀÇ ¼ö·®ÀÌ ÀûÀº °æ¿ì ¿ë´ãÈ£ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀº ´õ¿í ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÃÑÁú¼Ò¿Í ÃÑÀÎ ³óµµÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â °¢ Á¶°Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¿ë´ã´ïÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ ¹æ·ù·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¡Â÷·Î ¼öÁúÀÌ °³¼±µÇ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª BOD ³óµµÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â ½ÇÃø ¼öÁú(98³â ȯ°æºÎ ÃøÁ¤ÀÚ·á)ÀÌ 1±Þ¼ö(1 mg/¥é) º¸´Ù ¾çÈ£ÇÑ ¼öÁúÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¹Ç·Î 1±Þ¼ö(1 mg/¥é)¿Í 2±Þ¼ö(3 mg/¥é)ÀÇ ¼öÁú·Î ¹æ·ùµÇ´Â °ÍÀ» °¡Á¤ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ¹æ·ù·®ÀÇ Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¶ó ¿ë´ãÈ£ ÇÏ·ùÀÇ ¼öÁúÀº ¿ÀÈ÷·Á ¾ÇȵǴ °á°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿ë´ãÈ£ ºÎ±ÙÀÇ ÇöÀç ¼öÁúÀº ÃÑÁú¼ÒÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â 5±Þ¼öÀÇ ±âÁØ(1.5 mg/¥é)À» »óȸÇϸç, ÃÑÀÎÀÇ ³óµµ´Â 3±Þ¼ö (0.03¡0.06 mg/¥é) Á¤µµÀÇ ¼öÁúÀ» ³ªÅ¸³½´Ù. À¯¿ª¿¡¼ ¿µ¾ç¿°·ùÀÇ ¿À¿°ºÎÇϸ¦ °ü¸®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ±â¼úÀû, °æÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇѰ谡 ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ» °¨¾ÈÇÒ ¶§, ¿ë´ãÈ£ ¹æ·ù¼ö³»ÀÇ ¿µ¾ç¿°·ù ³óµµ´Â Å©°Ô °³¼±µÇÁö ¸øÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÈ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ¿ë´ãÈ£ÀÇ ¹æ·ù·® º¯È°¡ ´ëûȣÀÇ ¼öÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀº ¿ë´ãÈ£¿Í ¿ë´ãÈ£ ÇÏ·ùºÎÀÇ ¼öÁú ¹× À¯·®Á¶°Ç¿¡ µû¶ó °¢°¢ ´Ù¸£¸ç, ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ ¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ °ü¸®¸¦ À§Çؼ´Â Çö½ÇÀûÀÎ ÀÚ·á ¹× ¿©°ÇÀ» ÃæºÐÈ÷ °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ´Ù. |
|
Effects of Yongdam Dam discharge conditions on water quality of the Keum River and Daechung Lake inflow were analyzed for various scenarios using WASP5 water quality model. Three different groups of scenarios were tested: 1) Two different weather conditions; the lowest flow year and the highest flow year since the beginning of Daechung Dam operation in 1981, 2) Fine discharge flow rates; 5.4, 8.9, 12.4, 16.4 §©/s and field observed flow during the study period, 3) Three conditions of discharge water quality; first grade, second grade by Korean water quality standard and field observed water quality. Effect of changes in Yongdam Dam discharges was greater for dry year. The increase of discharge from the Yongdam Dam will improve water quality of downstream areas only when the water quality of the discharge is equal or better than that of downstream areas. Field observed water qualify data show that BOD concentrations are lower than first grade level but TN and TP concentrations are exceeding 5th and 3rd grade level in Korean standard, respectively. Considering that nutrient control methods in watershed areas of Yongdam dam are limited, it is expected that nutrient concentrations from Yongdam Dam discharge will be higher than 2nd grade water quality standard level. Therefore, it would be important to develop practical management strategies in the watershed area of Yongdam Dam based on field conditions for conservation of water quality in downstream areas. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
¿ë´ãÈ£;±Ý°;´ëûȣ;¿µ¾ç¿°·ù;¼öÁú±âÁØ;Yongdam Dam;Keum River;Daechung Lake;WASP5;Nutrient Concentration;Water Quality Standard; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.35, no.5, 2002³â, pp.525-539
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211921444994)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|