¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.41, no.7, 2008³â, pp.711-723
¼ö¹®º¯È­ ÁöÇ¥¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ´Ù¸ñÀû´ïÀÇ À¯·®º¯È­ ºÐ¼®
( Hydrologic Regime Alteration Analysis of the Multi-Purpose Dam by Indicators of Hydrologic Alterations )
¹ÚºÀÁø;°­±âÈ£;Á¤°ü¼ö; Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ´ï.À¯¿ª°ü¸®Ã³ ÇÏõÀ¯¿ªÆÀ;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø°ü¸®Ã³ ÇÏõÀ¯¿ªÆÀ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¼ö¹®º¯È­ ÁöÇ¥¹ýÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© 11°³ ÁÖ¿ä ´Ù¸ñÀû´ïÀÇ ¿ù À¯·® Å©±â, ¿¬ ÃÖ¼Ò.ÃÖ´ëÀ¯·® Å©±â¿Í Áö¼Ó±â°£, °í.Àú¸ÆÆÄ ºóµµ¿Í ÁÖ±â, ¼ö¹®°î¼± º¯È­ ºñÀ²°ú ºóµµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ù À¯·®º¯È­ ºÐ¼® °á°ú, °¥¼ö±â¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 6¿ù°ú 10¿ùºÎÅÍ 12¿ù±îÁö´Â À¯ÀÔ·®ÀÌ $6.38m^3/sec{sim}39.84m^3/sec$À̾úÀ¸³ª, ¹æ·ù·®Àº $20.36m^3/sec{sim}49.43m^3/sec$·Î $1.84%{sim}200.98%$°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ì±âöÀÎ 7¿ùºÎÅÍ 9¿ù±îÁö´Â À¯ÀÔ·®ÀÌ $79.06m^3/sec{sim}137.12m^3/sec$ À̾úÀ¸³ª, ¹æ·ù·®Àº $65.32m^3/sec{sim}80.16m^3/sec$·Î $18.19%{sim}40.39%$°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬ ÃÖ¼Ò.ÃÖ´ë À¯·®º¯È­ ºÐ¼® °á°ú´Â 1ÀÏ ÃÖ¼ÒÀ¯·®ÀÌ $82.86%{sim}2,950%$°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿¬ ÃÖ¼Ò ¹× ÃÖ´ë À¯·®º¯È­´Â 1ÀÏ ÃÖ¼ÒÀ¯·®Àº $82.86%{sim}2,950%$°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, 1ÀÏ ÃÖ´ëÀ¯·®Àº $34.78%{sim}83.96%$°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. °í.Àú¸ÆÆÄÀÇ ºóµµ¿Í ÁÖ±âÀÇ ºÐ¼® °á°ú, Àú¸ÆÆÄÀÇ ¹ß»ý Ƚ¼ö´Â ´ï Á¶ÀýÈÄ $29.67%{sim}99.07%$°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °í¸ÆÆÄÀÇ ¹ß»ýȽ¼öµµ $4.6%{sim}92.35%$°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¹®°î¼± º¯È­ ºñÀ²°ú ºóµµÀÇ ºÐ¼® °á°ú »ó½Â·üÀº $15.84%{sim}79.31%$°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Çϰ­À²Àº $1.97%{sim}107.10%$°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯·®º¯È­Á¤µµ ºÐ¼® °á°ú´Â 1ÀÏ ÃÖ¼ÒÀ¯·®Àº $0.60{sim}2.67$ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 1ÀÏ ÃÖ´ë À¯·®Àº $0.50{sim}1.00$À¸·Î °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù.
In this study, Hydrologic regime alterations(magnitude, magnitude and duration of annual extreme, frequency and duration of high and low pulse, rate and frequency of water condition changes, Range of Variability Approach) were analyzed by using Indicators of Hydrologic Alterations at the 11 major multi-purpose dam. The analysis result of the magnitude of monthly water conditions during drought season, inflow was $6.38m^3/sec{sim}39.84m^3/sec$ and outflow was $20.36m^3/sec{sim}49.43m^3/sec$, was increased $1.84%{sim}200.98%$. The analysis result of the magnitude of monthly water conditions during flood season, inflow was from $79.06m^3/sec{sim}137.12m^3/sec$ and outflow was from $65.32m^3/sec{sim}80.16m^3/sec$, was decreased from $18.19%{sim}40.39%$. The analysis result of the magnitude and duration of annual extreme, 1-day minimum was increased $82.86%{sim}2,950%$, but 1-day maximum was decreased $34.78%{sim}83.96%$. The analysis result of the frequency and duration of high and low pulse, low pulse count was decreased $29.67%{sim}99.07%$ and high pulse count was also decreased $4.6%{sim}92.35%$ after dam operation. Hydrograph rise rate was decreased $15.84%{sim}79.31%$ and fall rate was $1.97%{sim}107.10%$. RVA of 1-day minimum was increased $0.60{sim}2.67$, also RVA of 1-day maximum was decreased $0.50{sim}1.00$.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼ö¹®º¯È­ ÁöÇ¥¹ý;´Ù¸ñÀû´ï;¿ù À¯·®ÀÇ Å©±â;¿¬ÃÖ¼Ò.ÃÖ´ëÀ¯·® Å©±â¿Í Áö¼Ó±â°£;¿¬ÃÖ¼Ò.ÃÖ´ëÀ¯·®ÀÇ ¹ß»ý½Ã±â;°í.Àú¸ÆÆÄ ºóµµ¿Í ÁÖ±â;¼ö¹®°î¼± º¯È­ ºñÀ²°ú ºóµµ;À¯·®º¯È­Á¤µµ ºÐ¼®;Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration;Multi-purpose dam;Magnitude;Magnitude and Duration of Annual Extreme Conditions;Timing of Annual Extreme conditions;Frequency and Duration of High and Low Pulse;Rate and Frequency of Water Condition Changes;Range of Var
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.41, no.7, 2008³â, pp.711-723
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200824550465079)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿