¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.35, no.3, 2002³â, pp.307-319
¸éÀûÆò±Õ°­¿ìÀÇ ÃßÁ¤¿ÀÂ÷¿Í À¯Ãâ°è»ê¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Estimation Error of Areal Average Rainfall and Its Effect on Runoff Computation )
À¯Ã¶»ó;±è»ó´Ü;À±¿ë³²; ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;;°í·Á´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â WGR °­¿ì¸ðÇüÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸ðÀÇµÈ °ø°£ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐÆ÷µÈ °­¿ìÀڷḦ ¼öÁ¤Clark¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î À¯Ãâ ÇØ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¸éÀûÆò±Õ°­¿ìÀÇ ÃßÁ¤¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ÀÂ÷¿Í À¯Ãâ¿ÀÂ÷»çÀÌÀÇ °ü°è·Ð °íÂûÇØ º¸¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °ü°è´Â °­¿ì°üÃø¼ÒÀÇ ¹Ðµµ¸¦ ´Ù¾çÇÏ°Ô º¯È­½ÃÄѰ¡¸ç ¾Æ¿ï·¯ È£¿ìÀÇ ¹æÇâÀ» ¿©·¯ °¡Áö °æ¿ì·Î °¡Á¤ÇÏ¿© »ìÆìº¸¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ±× °á°ú¸¦ Á¤¸®ÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. (1) ¸éÀûÆò±Õ°­¿ìÀÇ ÃßÁ¤¿ÀÂ÷ ¹× ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯Ãâ¿ÀÂ÷´Â °­¿ì°üÃø¼ÒÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó Áö¼öÇÔ¼öÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÙ¾îµé°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¾î¶² ¹Ðµµ ÀÌ»óÀÌ µÇ¸é ±× °¨¼Ò ÆøÀÌ Å©°Ô µÐÈ­µÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. (2) ¸éÀûÆò±Õ°­¿ìÀÇ ÃßÁ¤¿ÀÂ÷´Â °­¿ì°üÃø¼ÒÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ÀÛÀ»¼ö·Ï À¯Ãâ¿¡ º¸´Ù Å« ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¸éÀûÆò±Õ °­¿ì-À¯ÃâÀÇ °ü°è¿¡¼­´Â ±× ¿ÀÂ÷ÀÇ ºñ°¡ 1.0ÀÌÇÏ·Î À¯¿ª¸éÀûÆò±Õ°­¿ì ÃßÁ¤½ÃÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ À¯Ãâ¿¡ °¨¼ÒµÇ¾î Àü´ÞµÇ´Âµ¥ ºñÇØ ÷µÎÀ¯Ãâ·®¿¡´Â ±×´ë·Î ¶Ç´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ µû¶ó ÁõÆøµÇ¾î Àü´ÞµÊÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. (3) È£¿ìÀÇ ¹æÇ⼺¿¡ µû¸¥ °­¿ì¿ÀÂ÷´Â Å©°Ô ¿µÇâ ¹ÞÁö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª, À¯Ãâ¿ÀÂ÷´Â È£¿ìÀÇ ¹æÇâÀÌ À¯¿ªÀÇ ¹è¼ö¹æÇâ¿¡ ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ´õ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ ¼ö¹®°î¼±ÀÇ Çü»óÀûÀÎ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­º¸´Ù´Â ÷µÎÀ¯Ãâ·®¿¡ ´õ ¸¹Àº ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¿©Áø´Ù.
This study used the WGR model to generate the rainfall input and the modified Clark method to estimate the runoff with the aim of investigating how the errors from the areal average rainfall propagates to runoff estimates. This was done for several cases of raingauge density and also by considering several storm directions. Summarizing the study results are as follows. (1) Rainfall and runoff errors decrease exponentially as the raingauge density increases. However, the error stagnates after a threshold density of raingauges. (2) Rainfall errors more affect to runoff estimates when the density of raingauges is relatively low. Generally, the ratio between estimation errors of rainfall and runoff volumes was found much less than one, which indicates that there is a smoothing effect of the basin. However, the ratio between estimation errors of rainfall to peak flow becomes greater than one to indicate the amplification of rainfall effect to peak flow. (3) For the study basin in this studs no significant effect of storm direction could be found. However, the runoff error becomes higher when the storm and drainage directions are identical. Also, the error was found higher for the peak flow than for the overall runoff hydrograph.
 
Ű¿öµå
°­¿ì-À¯Ãâ;WGR °­¿ì¸ðÇü;¼öÁ¤Clark¹æ¹ý;¿ÀÂ÷ÇØ¼®;Rainfall-Runoff;WGR Model;Modified Clark Model;Error Analysis;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.35, no.3, 2002³â, pp.307-319
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211921040439)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿