¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.43, no.5, 2010³â, pp.495-505
ÃÖÀû»ç¾÷±Ô¸ð °áÁ¤À» ÅëÇÑ À¯¿ªÄ¡¼ö°èȹÀÇ ´ë¾È¼ö¸³ ¹æ¾È
( Alternatives Development for Basin-wide Flood Mitigation Planning by Determining Economic Optimal Project Size )
ÀÌÃæ¼º;½É¸íÇÊ;ÀÌ»ó¿ø; Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ±â¼úÁö¿ø¼¾ÅÍ;ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ »çȸ±â¹Ý½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ °æÁ¦ÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
À¯¿ª´ÜÀ§ÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀû Ä¡¼ö°èȹÀº °í·ÁµÇ´Â ´ÜÀ§»ç¾÷ÀÇ ¼ö°¡ ¸¹°í ±× Ư¼ºµµ ´Ù¾çÇϹǷΠÀ̵éÀ» Á¶ÇÕÇÑ ÃÖÀûÀÇ ´ë¾ÈÀ» ¼ö¸³ÇϱⰡ ½±Áö ¾Ê´Ù. ÃÖÀûÀÇ ´ë¾È¼ö¸³À» À§Çؼ­´Â È«¼öÇÇÇØ¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °Í»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó °¨³»ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÇÇØÀÇ ¼öÁØÀ» °áÁ¤Çؾ߸¸ ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °áÁ¤Àº Å« Ʋ¿¡¼­ '»çȸÀû ÇÕÀÇ'¶ó´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î µµÃâµÇÁö¸¸ ÀÏÂ÷ÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ±â¼úÀûÀ¸·Î °¡´ÉÇÑ ¹üÁÖ¿¡¼­ °æÁ¦Àû È¿À²¼º Ãø¸éÀÇ ºÐ¼®À» ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº °¢ ´ÜÀ§»ç¾÷µéÀÇ Á¶ÇÕÀÌ °æÁ¦Àû È¿À²¼ºÀ» °®µµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â ´ë¾È¼ö¸³ ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. À̸¦ À§Çؼ­ Ä¡¼ö»ç¾÷À» ÅõÀÔ°ú »êÃâ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °æÁ¦ÇÐÀû »ý»êȰµ¿À¸·Î Á¤ÀÇÇϰí ÃÖÀû»ç¾÷±Ô¸ð¸¦ ´ë¾È¼ö¸³ÀÇ ¿øÄ¢À¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±âÁ¸¿¡ °øÇÐÀû Ãø¸é¿¡¸¸ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´ø ´ë¾È¼ö¸³ ¹æ¹ýÀ» °³¼±ÇÏ¿© °æÁ¦Àû Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ÃÖÀû»ç¾÷±Ô¸ð¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿´´Ù´Â µ¥¿¡ ÀÇÀǰ¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´ë¾È¼ö¸³ ¹æ¹ýÀº ÇÏõÁß½ÉÀÇ ¼Ò±ØÀû Ä¡¼ö°èȹÀ» Áö¾çÇϰí ÇÇÇØÁö¿ª Áß½ÉÀÇ À¯¿ª´ÜÀ§ Ä¡¼ö°èȹ ¼ö¸³À¸·Î ÀüȯµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ÃÖ±ÙÀÇ Á¤ºÎÁ¤Ã¥ ¹æÇâ¿¡µµ ºÎÇÕÇϸç, Á¤Ã¥¼ö¸³À» À§ÇÑ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¼ö´ÜÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
The integrated basin-wide flood mitigation planning has a numerous individual proposals with different characteristics. So, it makes difficult to develop the optimal alternative that combines such elements. To develop the optimal alternative, it's necessary not only to assess the flood damage but also to define a tolerable degree of damage. Such a definition is made in a way, dubbed the 'social consensus' in a broad sense; but initially, it requires the analysis of the economic efficiency within a scope, which is technically achievable. This study aims to propose the alternatives development method so that the combination of the individual proposals could be economically efficient. To this end, this study defined the flood mitigation projects as the economic production activities carried out by inputs and outputs, and proposed the optimal project size as the principle of developing alternatives. This study may have the worth in improving the alternatives development method by considering the optimal project scale from the economic viewpoint while the existing method depending on engineering aspect. Such approach is expected to correspond to the current government's policy that avoids the passive flood mitigation focused on channel-wide planning but pursues the basin-wide flood mitigation planning focusing on damaged area, thereby provide efficient tools to come up with the solution.
 
Ű¿öµå
Ä¡¼ö;´ë¾È¼ö¸³;ÃÖÀû»ç¾÷±Ô¸ð;À¯¿ª´ÜÀ§;°æÁ¦Àû È¿À²¼º;flood mitigation;alternatives development;optimal project size;basin-wide;economic efficiency;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.43, no.5, 2010³â, pp.495-505
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201016264960189)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿