¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.41, no.9, 2008³â, pp.907-917
À¯Ãâ¸ðÇüÀÌ ±âÈĺ¯È­ ¼öÀÚ¿ø ¿µÇâÆò°¡¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇ⠺м®
( Hydrological Model Response to Climate Change Impact Assessments on Water Resources )
Á¤ÀÏ¿ø;À̺´ÁÖ;ÀüÅÂÇö;¹è´öÈ¿; ¼¼Á¾´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú BK21;¼¼Á¾´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;¼¼Á¾´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;¼¼Á¾´ëÇб³ ¹°ÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¼Ò.Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â PRMS, SLURP, SWAT ¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© À¯Ãâ¸ðÇü¿¡ µû¶ó ¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ ±âÈĺ¯È­ ¿µÇâÆò°¡ °á°ú¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Â÷À̸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ ¸ÕÀú °¢ ¸ðÇüÀ» ¾Èµ¿´ïÀ¯¿ª¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© °üÃøÀÚ·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸ðÀÇ´É·ÂÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× ´ÙÀ½ ±â¿Â°ú °­¼ö º¯È­¸¦ °¡Á¤ÇÑ ÇÕ¼º½Ã³ª¸®¿À »óȲ¿¡¼­ °¢ ¸ðÇüº° ¸ðÀǰá°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¼¼ ¸ðÇüÀº °üÃø±â°£¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â °üÃøÀ¯·®¿¡ ±ÙÁ¢ÇÑ ¸ðÀǸ¦ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °­¼ö¿Í ±â¿ÂÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿´À» °æ¿ì¿¡´Â À¯Ãâ·®ÀÇ º¯È­·® ¸ðÀÇ¿¡¼­ °¢ ¸ðÇüº°·Î »óÀÌÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ±â¿ÂÀÌ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÒ °æ¿ì ¸ðÇüº° °á°úÂ÷À̰¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Âµ¥, À̰ÍÀº °¢ ¸ðµ¨¿¡¼­ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â Áõ¹ß»ê·® ÃßÁ¤¹æ¹ýÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ °¡Àå Å©°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ¼öÀÚ¿ø ¿µÇâÆò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù.
This study investigates differences in hydrological responses to the climatic scenarios resulting from the use of different three hydrological models, PRMS, SLURP, and SWAT. First, the capability of the three models in simulating the present climate water balance components is evaluated at Andong-dam watershed. And then, the results of the models in simulating the impact using hypothetical climate change scenarios are analyzed and compared. The results show that three models have similar capabilities in simulating observed data. However, greater differences in the model results occur when the models are used to simulate the hydrological impact under hypothetical climate change. According as temperature change grows, the differences between model results is increasing because of differences of the evapotranspiration estimation methods. The results suggest that technique that consider the uncertainty by using different hydrological models will be needed when climate change impact assessment on water resources.
 
Ű¿öµå
±âÈĺ¯È­;¼ö¹®¸ðÇü;¸ðÇüºñ±³;±âÈĺ¯È­ ¿µÇâÆò°¡;climate change;hydrological models;model comparison;hydrological impacts assessment;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.41, no.9, 2008³â, pp.907-917
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200828955287935)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿