¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.41, no.3, 2008³â, pp.325-340
Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Àú¼ö·®(Low flow) Áö¿ª ºóµµºÐ¼®
( Regional Low Flow Frequency Analysis Using Bayesian Multiple Regression )
±è»ó¿í;À̱漺; ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ BK21 ¾ÈÀüÇϰí Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ »çȸ±â¹Ý°Ç¼³ »ç¾÷´Ü;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ °Ç¼³.ȯ°æ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Àú¼ö·® Áö¿ª ºóµµºÐ¼®(regional low flow frequency analysis)À» ¼öÇàÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ÀϹÝÃÖ¼ÒÀڽ¹ý(ordinary least squares method)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®À» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÃø¸é¿¡¼­ÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ Ž»öÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÃßÁ¤Ä¡¿Í t ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »êÁ¤ÇÑ ÀÏ¹Ý ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®ÀÇ ÃßÁ¤Ä¡ÀÇ ½Å·Ú±¸°£À» ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ÀçÇö±â°£º° ºñ±³°á°ú¸¦ º¸¸é t ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »êÁ¤µÈ Æò±Õ ÃßÁ¤Ä¡¿Í Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Æò±Õ ÃßÁ¤Ä¡´Â Å©°Ô ´Ù¸£Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ºÒÈ®½Ç¼º Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ Æò°¡Çغ¼ ¶§ ½Å·Ú±¸°£ÀÇ »óÇÑÃßÁ¤Ä¡¿Í ÇÏÇÑÃßÁ¤Ä¡ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®À» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ ±âÁ¸ ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ìº¸´Ù ÈξÀ ÀÛÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, À̷κÎÅÍ Àú¼ö·®(low flow) Áö¿ª ºóµµºÐ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®ÀÌ ÀÏ¹Ý È¸±ÍºÐ¼®º¸´Ù ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀ» Ç¥ÇöÇϴµ¥ À־ ¿ì¼öÇÏ´Ù´Â °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ³«µ¿°­ À¯¿ª¿¡ 2°³ÀÇ ¹Ì°èÃø À¯¿ªÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ°í ±¸ÃàµÈ Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±Í¸ðÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¹Ì°èÃø À¯¿ª¿¡¼­ÀÇ Àú¼ö·®(low flow)À» ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¹Ì°èÃø À¯¿ª¿¡¼­ÀÇ Àú¼ö(low flow) Ư¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»´Â µ¥ À־ È¿°úÀûÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» ÀÔÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù.
This study employs Bayesian multiple regression analysis using the ordinary least squares method for regional low flow frequency analysis. The parameter estimates using the Bayesian multiple regression analysis were compared to conventional analysis using the t-distribution. In these comparisons, the mean values from the t-distribution and the Bayesian analysis at each return period are not significantly different. However, the difference between upper and lower limits is remarkably reduced using the Bayesian multiple regression. Therefore, from the point of view of uncertainty analysis, Bayesian multiple regression analysis is more attractive than the conventional method based on a t-distribution because the low flow sample size at the site of interest is typically insufficient to perform low flow frequency analysis. Also, we performed low flow prediction, including confidence interval, at two ungauged catchments in the Nakdong River basin using the developed Bayesian multiple regression model. The Bayesian prediction proves effective to infer the low flow characteristic at the ungauged catchment.
 
Ű¿öµå
Àú¼ö·®(low flow) Áö¿ª ºóµµºÐ¼®;ºÒÈ®½Ç¼º;Bayesian ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®;t ºÐÆ÷;¹Ì°èÃøÀ¯¿ª;Regional low flow frequency analysis;Uncertainty;Bayesian multiple regression;t-distribution;Ungauged catchment;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.41, no.3, 2008³â, pp.325-340
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200814256113802)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿