¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.41, no.3, 2008³â, pp.277-291
¿äÀκм®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼ö°è °ü¸® ¸Æ¶ô¿¡¼­ À¯¿ª°ü¸® »óŸ¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÅëÇÕÁö¼ö °³¹ß
( Development of a Integrated Indicator System for Evaluating the State of Watershed Management in the Context of River Basin Management Using Factor Analysis )
°­¹Î±¸;À̱¤¸¸;°íÀÍȯ;Á¤Âù¿ë; ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø, ÅëÇÕ¹°°ü¸®¿¬±¸´Ü;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø À¯·®Á¶»ç»ç¾÷´Ü;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¼ö°è°ü¸®¸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â ¼ö°èÀÇ »óŸ¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í °ü¸® ¸ñÇ¥¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¼ö°èÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, À̸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀûÀýÇÑ ´ëÃ¥À» ¼ö¸³ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ¼ö°è´Â ¿©·¯ °³ÀÇ À¯¿ªµé·Î ³ª´²Áö¸ç, À̵éÀº ¼öÀÚ¿ø, »çȸ ¹× °æÁ¦ ½Ã½ºÅÛ, ¹ý·ü ¹× Á¦µµ, »ç¿ëÀÚ, ÅäÁö, »ýÅÂ°è µîÀÇ ¿ä¼Òµé·Î ±¸¼ºµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. À̵éÀº º¹ÀâÇÏ°Ô ¿¬°áµÇ¾î ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¼ö°è °ü¸® Á¤È²¿¡¼­ À¯¿ª°ü¸®¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇϱâ À§Çؼ­ À¯¿ªÀÇ °ü¸® »óŸ¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ Æò°¡Áö¼ö¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æò°¡Áö¼ö´Â À̼ö °ü¸®, ȯ°æ ¹× »ýÅÂ°è °ü¸®, È«¼ö °ü¸®¸¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¼¼ºÎÁöÇ¥¿Í º¯¼ö·Î ±¸¼ºÀÌ µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À̵éÀº ¿äÀκм®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ¼±Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼¼ºÎÁö¼öÀÇ ±¸¼ºº¯¼öµéÀ» ¼±Á¤Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¸ÕÀú °ü·Ã ÀÚ·áµéÀ» À¯¿ª ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼ÒÀÎ ¼öÀÚ¿ø, ÅäÁö, »ýŰè, »çȸ ¹× °æÁ¦ ½Ã½ºÅÛ, ¹ý°ú Á¦µµ, »ç¿ëÀÚ µîÀ» ´ëºÐ·ù Ç׸ñÀ¸·Î ¼³Á¤ÇÏ°í ¼öÁýÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÑ °, ¿äÀκм®¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ º¯¼öµéÀ» ¼±Á¤Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© KMO Ç¥º» ÀûÇÕ¼º °Ë»ç¿Í BartlettÀÇ ±¸Çü¼º °Ë»ç¸¦ °¢°¢ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Â °, ¼±Á¤µÈ º¯¼öµéÀ» ¿äÀκм®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ¼¼ºÎÁöÇ¥·Î ±×·ìÈ­ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢ ¼¼ºÎÁö¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© 3°¡Áö ¿äÀεéÀÌ ¼±Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌµé ¿äÀεéÀº ¼¼ºÎÁö¼öÀÇ ¼¼ºÎÁöÇ¥°¡ µÇ¸ç, Æ÷ÇÔµÈ º¯¼öµéÀÇ °ü°è¿Í Ư¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ¼¼ºÎÁöÇ¥ÀÇ À̸§ÀÌ Áö¾îÁ³´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ¿äÀκм® °á°ú¸¦ °ËÅäÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© º¯¼öµéÀÇ ¿äÀÎ ºÎÇÏ·®À» °ËÅäÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿äÀÎÁ¡¼öµé »çÀÌÀÇ »ó°üºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ¿äÀÎ Á¡¼öµé »çÀÌ¿¡ »ó°ü¼ºÀÌ ¾ø´Ù´Â °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. °ËÅä °á°ú´Â º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ °³¹ß µÈ À¯¿ª°ü¸® Æò°¡Áö¼öÀÇ ±¸¼ºº¯¼öÀÇ ¼±Á¤°ú À̵éÀÇ ±×·ìÈ­°¡ ÀûÀýÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, °³¹ßµÈ Æò°¡Áö¼ö°¡ À¯¿ª°ü¸® Æò°¡¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î Àû¿ëÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
In order to carry out river basin management, it is necessary to evaluate the state of the river basin and make site-specific measures on the basis of management goals and objectives. A river basin is divided into several watersheds, which are composed of several components: water resources, social and economic systems, law and institution, user, land, ecosystems, etc. They are connected among them and form network holistically. In this study, a methodology for evaluating watershed management was developed by consideration of the various features of a watershed system. This methodology employed factor analysis to develop sub-indexes for evaluating water use management, environment and ecosystem management, and flood management in a watershed. To do this, first, the related data were gathered and classified into six groups that are the components of watershed systems. Second, in all sub-indexes, preliminary tests such as KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's test of sphericity were conducted to check the data's acceptability to factor analysis, respectively. Third, variables related to each sub-index were grouped into three factors by consideration of statistic characteristics, respectively. These factors became indicators and were named, taking into account the relationship and the characteristics of included variables. In order to check the study results, the computed factor loadings of each variable were reviewed, and correlation analysis among factor scores was fulfilled. It was revealed that each factor score of factors in a sub-index was not correlated, and grouping variables by factor analysis was appropriate. And, it was thought that this indicator system would be applied effectively to evaluating the states of watershed management.
 
Ű¿öµå
À¯¿ª°ü¸®;¼ö°è°ü¸®;Æò°¡;Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥;¿äÀκм®;Watershed ;management;River basin management;Evaluation;Indicator system;Factor analysis;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.41, no.3, 2008³â, pp.277-291
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200814256113774)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿