¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.5, no.3, 2004³â, pp.55-62
¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ ¼±Á¤ ÀýÂ÷ ¸ðµ¨ °³¹ß
( Development of the Promoter Selection Procedural Model for Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects )
ÇÑÇöÁ¾;ÃÖÀÀ±Ô;ÀÌÂù½Ä; SK°Ç¼³ °ÇÃà»ç¾÷1ÆÀ;ÀÎõ´ë °ÇÃà°øÇаú;ÀÎõ´ë °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â À¯´ÉÇÑ ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ¸¦ ¼±Á¤Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀýÂ÷¸ðµ¨À» Á¦¾ÈÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±¹³»$cdot$¿Ü ¹®Çå°ú ±âÁ¸ ¹æ½Ä ¹× Á¦µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ËÅä$cdot$ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ±¹³» ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ ¼±Á¤ ÀýÂ÷ÀÇ ÇöȲ°ú ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àû°Ý½É»ç ¹× Çù»óÀýÂ÷ÀÇ ºÒÇÕ¸®, »ç¾÷ Âü¿©ÁÖü °£ ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅë$cdot$Á¤º¸±³È¯ ±âȸ ºÎÁ· µî ¹®Á¦Á¡À» µµÃâÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢°¢ÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡µé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ë¾ÈÀ» ¸ð»öÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸é´ãÁ¶»ç ¹× ¼³¹®Á¶»ç$cdot$ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ±¹³» ½ÇÁ¤¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ´ë¾ÈÀ» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ°í ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÀýÂ÷¸¦ Çõ½ÅÇÑ »õ·Î¿î »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ ¼±Á¤¸ðµ¨À» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. »çÀüÀڰݽɻç(PQ)Á¦µµÀÇ ½ÃÇà, »ç¾÷°èȹ Æò°¡ ¹× Çù»ó ÀýÂ÷ÀÇ °³¼±, ¹Î°£ÀÇ Ã¢ÀÇ¿Í È¿À²¼º µµÀÔ, ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅë ¹× Á¤º¸±³È¯ÀÇ È°¼ºÈ­¸¦ ÃËÁøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ³»¿ëÀ» ¼±Á¤ÀýÂ÷¿¡ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Àüü »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ ¼±Á¤ÀÌ °´°üÀûÀ̰í Åõ¸íÇÑ È¯°æ¿¡¼­ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áú ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ ¼±Á¤ TeamÀÇ ±¸¼º$cdot$¿î¿µÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to suggest a systematic procedural model for selecting competent project promoter. The proposed model was made by comparing domestic regulations and procedures with foreign nations', and through interviews with experts and literatures survey. The summaries of this paper are as follows. The current promoter selection procedure was evaluated by reviewing relevant papers, regulations and existing model. Some obstructions which hinder PPI project activation were identified, those are inadequacy of promoter qualification and negotiation process, lack of communication between parties, etc. Some alternatives which remove major obstructions are embodied in the model. The suggested model is comprised of PQ(prequalification), two phased evaluation for the technical proposals which include alternate, communication meeting, etc. To manage the overall procedure well, an involvement of professional "project promoter selection team" would be highly recommended. They will participate in each evaluation stage with full activities, and provide government with some technical materials for selecting promoter as coordinator.
 
Ű¿öµå
¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷;»ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ ¼±Á¤;ÀýÂ÷¸ðµ¨;PPI(Private Participation in Infrastructure) projects;project promoter selection;procedural model;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.5, no.3, 2004³â, pp.55-62
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200420828317427)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿