¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.40, no.12, 2007³â, pp.921-930
A2 ½Ã³ª¸®¿À¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¹³» ¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ º¯µ¿¼º Àü¸Á
( Outlook on Variation of Water Resources in Korea under SRES A2 Scenario )
¹è´öÈ¿;Á¤ÀÏ¿ø;À̺´ÁÖ; ¼¼Á¾´ëÇб³ ¹°ÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¼Ò.Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;¼¼Á¾´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;¼¼Á¾´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â SRES A2 ½Ã³ª¸®¿ÀÀÇ GCM °á°ú¸¦ ¿ªÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ´Ù¿î½ºÄÉÀÏÇÑ ÇØ»óµµ 27km$ imes$27km ÀڷḦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¹³» 139°³ À¯¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇØ ±âÈĺ¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼öÀÚ¿øÀÇ ½Ã°ø°£ º¯È­¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í °á°ú¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯Ãâ·®ÀÇ º¯È­´Â À¯¿ª¿¡ µû¶ó ±×¸®°í ºÐ¼®±â°£¿¡ µû¶ó º¯È­À²¿¡¼­ Â÷À̰¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±â°£º°·Î Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÀÖÀ¸³ª ÇѰ­°ú ÇѰ­µ¿Çؾȿ¡ À§Ä¡ÇÑ À¯¿ª¿¡¼­´Â ¿¬Æò±ÕÀ¯Ãâ·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ³ª¸ÓÁö À¯¿ª¿¡¼­´Â °¨¼ÒÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. °èÀýº° ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­´Â °¡À»°ú °Ü¿ïö À¯Ãâ·®ÀÇ Áõ°¡¿Í º½°ú ¿©¸§Ã¶ÀÇ À¯Ãâ·®ÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À¯¿ªº° À¯Ãâ°í¸¦ Àú¼ö(Q$leq$5mm), Æò¼ö (5mm$geq$100mm)À¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ À¯¿ª¿¡¼­ 2031-2060³â°ú 2061-2090³â ±â°£¿¡¼­ Àú¼ö·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °í¼ö·®ÀÇ °æ¿ì ±â°£º°·Î -100$sim$500%ÀÇ ºóµµº¯È­¸¦ º¸¿© Àú¼ö·®¿¡ ºñÇØ º¯È­À²ÀÌ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Æò±ÕÀ¯Ãâ·®ÀÇ Áõ°¨¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ÃÖ´ëÀ¯Ãâ·®Àº ½Ã°£¿¡ µû¶ó ´õ Ä¿Áú °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. À¯¿ªº° ¿¬Æò±Õ ±â¿Â, °­¼ö ±×¸®°í À¯Ã⺯ȭÀ²À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃßÁ¤ÇÑ È¸±ÍºÐ¼® °á°ú ±â¿ÂÀÌ 1$^{circ}C$ º¯È­ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ±Ç¿ªº°·Î ½ÇÁ¦Áõ¹ß»êÀÌ 3.4$sim$5.3% Á¤µµ º¯È­µÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ »óȲ¿¡¼­ °­¼ö·®ÀÌ $pm$10% º¯È­ µÉ °æ¿ì À¯Ãâ·®ÀÌ ±Ç¿ªº°·Î -18.2$sim$+12.4%(ÇѰ­), -21.6$sim$+14.6%(³«µ¿°­), -17.5$sim$+11.5%(±Ý°­), -18.4$sim$+10.6%(¼¶Áø°­), -19.9$sim$+12.7%(¿µ»ê°­)ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù.·¹½º¿Í ¾ËÄڿüº µ¶¼ºÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ °£À» º¸È£ÇÏ´Â Ç×»êÈ­È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÈ´Ù.Àº ¹«Ã³¸®±¸ º¸´Ù Æò±Õ¹ß¾ÆÀϼö°¡ ±æ¾ú´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î ħÁö¿Âµµ ¹× ħÁö½Ã°£ÀÇ Á¶ÀýÀº »ï³ª¹« Á¾ÀÚÀÇ ¹ß¾ÆÀϼö¸¦ ´ÜÃà½Ãų ¼ö´Â ¾øÀ¸³ª ±âÁ¸»óÅ·ΠÀ¯ÁöÇϸ鼭 ¹ß¾ÆÀ²Àº Çâ»ó½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¹«·Á 42.2%·Î ȸÇձ޽ıºº¸´Ù ¸Å¿ì ³ô¾Ò´Ù(p<0.0001). µû¶ó¼­ ¹è´Þ±Þ½Ä±ºÀÇ ¿µ¾ç¼Ò ¼·Ãë·®Àº Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ¿µ¾çºÒ·®ÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ Áö´Ñ ÀϹݳëÀÎÀº ¹°·Ð ¹«·áȸÇÕ±Þ½Ä ÀÌ¿ë ³ëÀεéÀÇ Æò±Õ¼·Ãë·®¿¡µµ ¹ÌÄ¡Áö ¸øÇÏ´Â ¸Å¿ì ÀúÁ¶ÇÑ ¿µ¾ç»óŸ¦ º¸¿© °æÁ¦·Â, À°Ã¼Àû Ȱµ¿ ¹× °Ç°­»óÅ µîÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ¿­¾ÇÇÑ À̵é Áý´Ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áú ÁÁÀº ¿µ¾ç¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ Á¦°øÀÌ ±¹°¡Àû Â÷¿ø¿¡¼­ ½Ã±ÞÈ÷ Àç°íµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀÚ Æ¯È÷ ¹è´Þ±Þ½Ä ´ë»óÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì ¸ðÁýÀÇ ¾î·Á¿òÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÀûÀº ¼öÀÇ ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀÚÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ º¸°íÇÑ °ÍÀº º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ Á¦ÇÑÁ¡À̶ó ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î Á» ´õ ¸¹Àº ´ë»óÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ Á¶»ç ¿¬±¸°¡ °è¼Ó ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ® °¡Á¤¹è´Þ±Þ½Ä ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ °³¼±À» À§ÇÑ À¯¿ëÇÑ ÀÚ·á·Î ÃàÀûµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.»ó¹üÁַΠȸº¹ÇÔÀ» ¾Ë¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í ½ÇÇè°á°ú Ç×¾ÏÁ¦ Åõ¿©ÈÄ 3 Àϰ ÇÇÆÇ Çü¼ºÇÑ ±º¿¡¼­ ÇÇÆÇÄ¡À¯°¡ ´Ê¾îÁø °ÍÀ¸·Î °üÂûµÇ¾î ÀÎü¿¡¼­ Ç×¾Ï Åõ¿©ÈÄ ¼ö¼ú½Ã±â´Â ÀÎü¸é¿ª°è°¡ ȸº¹ÇÏ´Â ½Ã±â¸¦ 3ÁÖÀÌ»ó °æ°úÈÄ Àû¾îµµ 4ÁÖ° ¼ö¼ú½Ã±â¸¦ Á¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ À¯¸®Çϸ®¶ó »ý°¢µÇ¾ú´Ù.ÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀº °³¹ßÀÇ Ãʱâ´Ü°èÀ̸ç, ¹°¼ºÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ ¾à¹°ÀÎ glycyrrhetinic acid($100{mu}M$)µµ CCh ÀÚ±ØÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Å¸¾×ºÐºñ¸¦ ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î ¹Ì·ç¾î gap junctionÀº ÈòÁã ¾ÇÇϼ± ¼¼Æ÷·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ Å¸¾×ºÐºñ Á¶Àý¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϴµ¥, ÀÌ´Â gap junctionÀÌ ¼¼Æ÷¸· $Ca^{2+}$ Åë·Î¸¦ Á¶ÀýÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¼ö¿ëü ÀÚ±ØÀ¸·Î À¯¹ßµÈ ¼¼Æ÷³» $Ca^{2+}$ ³óµµ º¯È­¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£ °á°úÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÃøµÈ´Ù.a,
The objective of this study is to present temporal-spatial variation of water resources on climate change impacts using the IPCC SRES A2 scenario and dynamical downscaling of the results (using the MM5 model with a resolution of 27km by 27km) at 139 sub-basins in Korea. The variation of runoff shows differences in the change of rate according to the each sub-basins and analysis durations. It has increased in the sub-basins located in Han river basin and east part of it, the other basins have decreased. In seasonal analysis, runoff in autumn and winter have increased, while in spring and summer have decreased. The results of frequency analyzing classified runoff(Low flow(Q$leq$5mm), Normal flow(5$geq$100mm)) show that low flow increase in most of the sub-basins for 2031-2060 and 2061-2090. In the case of high flow, it have higher frequency ranging from -100% to 500% than low flow. Regardless of the variation of mean runoff, maximum discharge appeared to be increase in process of time. The regression method is used to figure out the relationship between the rate of runoff change and mean temperature, mean precipitation under A2 scenario. The mean actual evapotranspirations from the regression equations increased by 3.4$sim$5.3% for the change of $1^{circ}C$. Also, for the precipitation change of $pm$10%, runoff variety range is -18.2$sim$+12.4% in Han River, -21.6$sim$+14.6% in Nakdong River, -17.5$sim$+11.5% in Gum River, -18.4$sim$+10.6% in Sumjin River, -19.9$sim$+12.7% Youngsan River basin.
 
Ű¿öµå
±âÈĺ¯È­ ¿µÇâÆò°¡;¼öÀÚ¿ø;A2 ½Ã³ª¸®¿À;Climate change impact assessment;Water resources;A2 scenario;PRMS;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.40, no.12, 2007³â, pp.921-930
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200704503862859)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿