|
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.41, no.1, 2008³â, pp.101-113
|
½ÇÇè¼±Åùý°ú ´ë¾È Æò°¡Áö¼ö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ´ë¾ÈÀÇ ÆíÀÍ»êÁ¤
( Evaluation of Alternative Benefit Using Choice Experiment Method and Alternative Evaluation Index ) |
Á¤Àº¼º;°ø±â¼;À̱漺;À¯ÁøÃ¤; ¼¿ï´ëÇб³ °øÇבּ¸¼Ò;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷°úÇбâ¼ú¿¬±¸¼Ò;¼¿ï´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ °Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇкÎ;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷°æÁ¦Çаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¾È¾çõ À¯¿ªÀÇ ¹°¼øÈ¯ °ÇÀüȸ¦ À§ÇÑ ÃÖÁ¾ ´ë¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϱâ À§ÇØ ºñ¿ëÈ¿°úºÐ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌÁß ÆíÀÍ»êÁ¤Àº Áø¼ú¼±È£±â¹ý Áß ÇϳªÀÎ ½ÇÇè¼±Åùý(Choice Experiments, CE)°ú ´ë¾ÈÀÇ Æò°¡Áö¼ö(Alternative Evaluation Index, AEI)¸¦ °áÇÕÇÏ¿© ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè¼±ÅùýÀº Áö¿ªº°·Î ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼Ó¼ºÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â ¾È¾çõ À¯¿ªÀ» ÀáÀçÀû À§Çèµµ¿Í Áö¸®Àû Ư¼ºÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î 6°³ Áö¿ªÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ¼³¹®°ú ºÐ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. NB > 0 ÀÌ»óÀÎ ´ë¾ÈµéÀº °øÇÐÀû, °æÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ¸Å¿ì ¿ì¼öÇÑ ´ë¾ÈÀ̹ǷΠ½ÇÇàÀ» Àû±Ø °ËÅäÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù. |
|
Cost-benefit analysis was conducted to propose the best alternatives for integrated watershed management. Benefits of all alternatives were estimated combining results of choice experiment method with alternative evaluation index (AEI). Choice experiment which is a kind of stated preference techniques was applied to six regions since the Anyangcheon watershed was divided into six according to spatial characteristics and conditions (potential hazard and location). Alternative of NB > 0 must be considerable since they are economically and technically feasible. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
À¯¿ªÅëÇÕ°ü¸®;ºñ¿ëÈ¿°úºÐ¼®;½ÇÇè¼±Åùý;´ë¾ÈÀÇ Æò°¡Áö¼ö;¾È¾çõ;Integrated watershed management;Cost-benefit analysis;Choice experiments method;Alternative evaluation index;Anyangcheon; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.41, no.1, 2008³â, pp.101-113
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200804503863937)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|