¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.32, no.3, 1999³â, pp.281-289
ÃÖÀûÈ­±â¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ±âÁ¸ ³ó¾÷¿ë Àú¼öÁö¿¡¼­ÀÇ ºÎÁ¸ ¼ö·Â¹ßÀü·® ÃßÁ¤
( Optimization Technique for Estimation of Potential Hydroelectric Energy at Existion Ahricultural Reservoir )
¾ÈÅÂÁø;·ùÈñÁ¤;¹ÚÁ¤ÀÀ; ÇѰæ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;ÇѰæ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±âÁ¸ ³ó¾÷¿ë ´ï¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼Ò¼ö·Â¹ßÀü »ç¾÷Àº ±âÁ¸ Àú¼öÁö·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ ¹æ·ù·®À» È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Àü·ÂÀÇ Ãß°¡ È®º¸¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ±âÁ¸ ³ó¾÷¿ë ´ï¿¡¼­ÀÇ ºÎÁ¸ ¼ö·Â¹ßÀü·®À» ÃßÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© °ü°³¿ë¼ö¸¦ ±Ù°Å·Î ÇÑ °ü°³¼ö·®ÀÇ À¯È², Àú¼öÁö ¹ßÀü¸ðÀǿ ¹× ºñ¼±Çü°èȹ ¸ðÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ±âÁ¸ ³ó¾÷¿ë Àú¼öÁö¿¡¼­ÀÇ ºÎÁ¸ ¼ö·Â¹ßÀü·®À» ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºñ¼±Çü°èȹ¹ýÀº ¼Ò¿ä°ü°³¿ë¼ö Á¦¾àÁ¶°Ç¾Æ·¡ ÃÖ´ë¹ßÀü·®À» ã´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯ÀÔ·®°ú °ü°³¿ë¼ö·®ÀÌ ÁÖ¾îÁø Ç¥º» Àú¼öÁö¿¡¼­, äÅÃµÈ ¹æ¹ý Áß ÃÖÀûÈ­ ¸ðÇüÀÇ ÃÖÀûÇØ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¹ßÀü·®ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç Àú¼öÁöÀÇ À¯ÀÔ·®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ßÀü¿ë¼öµµ ÃÖÀûÈ­ ¸ðÇüÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Àú¼öÁö °ü¸®¼öÀ§ »ó½ÂÀ¸·Î È®º¸µÇ´Â Àú¼ö·®¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹ßÀü·®ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¿¬Æò±Õ¹ßÀü·®À» ÃßÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, °ü¸®¼öÀ§ Áõ°¡¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¹ßÀü·®ÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ¹Ì¹ÌÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦¾ÈÇÑ ºÎÁ¸¹ßÀü·® ÃßÁ¤ ÀýÂ÷¿Í ÃÖÀûÈ­ ¸ðÇüÀº ±âÁ¸ ³ó¾÷¿ë´ïÀÇ ºÎÁ¸ ¹ßÀü·® ÃßÁ¤¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¼Ò¼ö·Â¹ßÀü »ç¾÷ °æÁ¦¼ººÐ¼®¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á·Î Ȱ¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
Small-scale hydropower projects at existing agricultural reservoirs can contribute to produce electric energy by maximizing the use of releases from the reservoirs. The irrigation water duration, the reservoir hydropower simulation, and the nonlinear programming model are employed to estimate potential hydroelectric energy at an existing reservoir. The nonlinear programming model consists of finding a maximum hydroelectric energy subject to irrigation water demand constraints. The sample reservoir given a set of inflow and irrigation water is considered. The optimal solutions by the optimization model yield the most hydroelectric energy for the analysis period in the three methods. Consequently, the nonlinear programming model uses the most water for hydropower generation with respect to the total inflow of the sample reservoir. It is also found that additional storage by increasing the normal water level of the sample reservoir does not significantly increase the annual hydroelectric energy for the given reservoir. It is expected that the optimization model and the proposed procedure for estimating potential hydroelectric energy can be applied to evaluate feasibility analysis for small scale hydropower additions at existing agricultural dams.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼ö·Â¹ßÀü;°ü°³¼ö·® À¯È²;Àú¼öÁö ¹ßÀü¸ðÀǿ;ÃÖÀûÈ­¸ðÇü;hydroelectnic energy;irrigation water duration;reservoir hydropower simulation model;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.32, no.3, 1999³â, pp.281-289
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199911920063139)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿