¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.44, no.9, 2011³â, pp.721-730
¹Ì°èÃø À¯¿ªÀÇ À¯Ãâ¸ðÀǸ¦ À§ÇÑ RAR ÀÚ·áÀÇ Àû¿ë¼º Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸
( Assessment of Radar AWS Rainrate for Streamflow Simulation on Ungauged Basin )
À̺´ÁÖ;°íÇý¿µ;Àå±âÈ£;ÃÖ¿µÁø; ±¹¸³±â»ó¿¬±¸¼Ò ÀÀ¿ë±â»ó¿¬±¸°ú ¼ö¹®ÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸ÆÀ;±¹¸³±â»ó¿¬±¸¼Ò ÀÀ¿ë±â»ó¿¬±¸°ú ¼ö¹®ÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸ÆÀ;±¹¸³±â»ó¿¬±¸¼Ò ÀÀ¿ë±â»ó¿¬±¸°ú ¼ö¹®ÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸ÆÀ;±¹¸³±â»ó¿¬±¸¼Ò ÀÀ¿ë±â»ó¿¬±¸°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±â»óû¿¡¼­ ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î »ý»êÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ·¹ÀÌ´õ-AWS °­¿ì°­µµ(RAR) ÀÚ·áÀÇ À¯Ãâ¸ðÀÇ Àû¿ë¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇϰíÀÚ Çϴµ¥ ±× ¸ñÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. Ãáõ´ï »ó·ùÀ¯¿ª(4859.73 $km^2$)À» ´ë»óÀ¯¿ªÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤Çϰí 5°³¼ÒÀ¯¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇѽôÜÀ§ AWS¿Í RAR À¯¿ªÆò±Õ°­¿ì·®À» »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ì°èÃø À¯¿ª¿¡¼­´Â AWS¿Í RARÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀÌ ³·°í °èÃøÀ¯¿ª¿¡¼­´Â ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ½Ã´ÜÀ§ AWS¿Í RAR À¯¿ªÆò±Õ °­¿ì·®Àº °­¿ìºÐÆ÷ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¶óÂ÷À̰¡ Å©°Ô ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µÎ ÀÚ·áÀÇ À¯¿ªÆò±Õ °­¿ì·®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 2006¡­2009³âÀÇ È«¼ö±â°£¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¸ðÀÇÀ¯·®À» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °èÃøÀ¯¿ª¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â Ãáõ´ï¿¡¼­´Â RAR ¸ðÀÇÀ¯·®ÀÌ AWS °á°ú¿¡ ºñÇØ Á¤È®µµ°¡ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª³ª ¹Ì°èÃøÀ¯¿ªÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇϴ ȭõ´ï°ú ÆòÈ­ÀÇ´ï¿¡¼­ AWS ¸ðÀÇÀ¯·®ÀÌ °ú´ëÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ÇÑÇØ¼­ RAR ¸ðÀÇÀ¯·®Àº Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¸ðÀÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ½Ã´ÜÀ§ RAR ÀÚ·á´Â ¹Ì°èÃø À¯¿ªÀÇ ½Ç½Ã°£ À¯·®¿¹ÃøÀ» À§ÇÑ °­¿ìÀÚ·á·Î Ȱ¿ëÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
The objective of this study is to assess the availability of streamflow simulation using Radar-AWS Rain rate (RAR) data which is produced by KMA on real-time. Chuncheon dam upstream basin is selected as study area and total area is 4859.73 $km^2$. Mean Areal Precipitation (MAP) using AWS and RAR are calculated on 5 subbasin. The correlationship of hourly MAPs between AWS and RAR is weak on ungauged subbasins but that is relatively high on gauged ones. We evaluated the simulated discharge using the MAPs derived from two data types during flood season from 2006 to 2009. The simulated discharges using AWS on Chuncheon dam (gauged basin) are well fitted with measured ones. In some cases, however, discharges using AWS on Hwacheon dam and Pyeonghwa dam with some ungauged subbasins are overestimated on the other hand, ones using RAR in the same case are well fitted with measured ones. The hourly RAR data is useful for the real-time river forecast on the ungauged basin in view of the results.
 
Ű¿öµå
·¹ÀÌ´õ-AWS °­¿ì°­µµ;À¯Ãâ¸ðÀÇ;À¯¿ªÆò±Õ°­¼ö·®;¹Ì°èÃøÀ¯¿ª;Radar-AWS Rain rate;streamflow simulation;mean areal precipitation;ungauged basin;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.44, no.9, 2011³â, pp.721-730
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201129349656508)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿