¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.44, no.9, 2011³â, pp.765-776
´ïÇÏ·ùÇÏõÁ¤ºñ»ç¾÷ÀÇ ´ï ¿î¿µ°³¼± È¿°ú °æÁ¦¼º ºÐ¼® (II) -°æÁ¦Àû ÆíÀÍ ¹× ºñ¿ëºÐ´ã·ü ºÐ¼®
( Economic Analysis of Dam Operation Improvement by Dam Downstream River Improvement Works (II)-Economic Benefit and Cost Allocation Analysis )
À¯½ÂÈÆ;À̱¤¸¸;ÀÌÀ»·¡; ¼­¿ï°úÇбâ¼ú´ëÇб³ ¿¡³ÊÁöȯ°æ´ëÇпø;K-water¿¬±¸¿ø;K-water¿¬±¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
´ïÀÌ °Ç¼³µÈ ÀÌÈÄ ´ïÁ÷ÇÏ·ù ÇÏõ±¸°£Àº ÇÏõ±¸¿ª³» »çÀ¯Áö °æÀÛ°ú ÇÏ»óÁÖÂ÷Àå µîÀÇ ÀÔÁö, »çÁÖ°¡ ¹ß´ÞÇÏ¿© ÇÏÆø°¨¼Ò¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¹®Á¦°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÇÏõÁ¤ºñÀÇ ¹ÌÈíÀ¸·Î È«¼ö½Ã ÇÏõÅë¼ö´É·ÂÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© À¯¿ªÀü¹Ý¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ´Ù. ´ï ¿î¿µÁ¶°Çµµ ÀϺΠÁ¦¾àÀ» ¹Þ°í Àִµ¥ ÀÌÀÇ ÇØ¼Ò¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ´ï ±â´ÉÀÇ È¸º¹°ú ¿î¿µÀÇ È¿À²¼º Á¦°í°¡ ÇÏõÀÇ Ä¡¼ö ¾ÈÁ¤¼º È®º¸¿Í ÇÔ²² °³¼±´ëÃ¥ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ´ï ¿î¿µ°ü¸®°³¼±°ú ¿¬°èµÈ ´ïÁ÷ÇÏ·ù ÇÏõÁ¤ºñ»ç¾÷ÀÌ ½ÃÇàµÇ°í Àִµ¥ »ç¾÷ÀÇ Å¸´ç¼º, °æÁ¦Àû ÆíÀÍ, ºñ¿ë¹èºÐ ¹× ÅõÀÚºñ ȸ¼ö¹æ¾È µî°ú °°Àº ¹®Á¦Á¡ÀÌ Á¦±âµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¾Æ¿ï·¯ ´ï»ç¾÷ÀÚ°¡ ÇÏõ»ç¾÷À» ÁÖ°üÇÑ »ç·Ê°¡ ¾ø¾î ÀÌµé »ç¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °æÁ¦¼º Æò°¡ÀÇ °´°üÀû ÇØ¼®°ú ÆíÀÍ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤·®È­ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °³¹ßÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´ïÁ÷ÇÏ·ù ÇÏõÁ¤ºñ»ç¾÷ÀÇ »ç¾÷ÁÖü(±¹°¡¿Í ¿ë¼ö ¹× ¹ßÀü»ç¾÷ÀÚ µî)°£ÀÇ ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ °Ç¼³ºñ¿ë ¹èºÐ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ°í ±× ÀûÁ¤¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æò°¡°á°ú, ½Ã¹ü Àû¿ë 3°³ ´ïÀÇ °æÁ¦Àû ÆíÀÍÀº 14,405.8¹é¸¸¿ø/³âÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ¾ú°í, ÆíÀÍ Áß »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚÀÎ K-waterÀÇ À繫Àû °¡Ä¡´Â 40%, Á¤ºÎÀÇ °ø°ø¼º ÆíÀÍÀº 60%·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù.
Flood discharge capacity in a dam downstream reach has been decreased after dam construction because of the river cross section reduction impacted by farm lands, sand-bars and parking lots, etc. in river flood plains. Those obstacles being in the river inside areas have caused negative influences to the dam operation policy. Therefore, the dam downstream river improvement work associated with the dam operation improvement plan is under construction for removing reduction factors on the dam effective storage, assuring flood safety in the dam downstream river and incrementing dam operation benefits. But the project has issued some problems such as project feasibility, economic evaluation, cost allocation and benefit share, etc. Since a dam enterpriser has not committed such kind of project before, it is necessary to set up an objective analysis process and a quantitative financial valuation. This study examines the measurable economic benefits and the cost allocation of the project for the fairness between benefit owners (central government and water electricity enterprisers). As a result, the total economic benefit from 3 dams (Imha, Daechung and Youngdam Dam) accounts for 14.41 Billion Won/year. The financial valuation of K-water as a project enterpriser is approximately estimated at 40% of the total value and the government is 60%.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÇÏõÁ¤ºñ»ç¾÷;°æÁ¦Àû ÆíÀÍ;À繫Àû °¡Ä¡;river improvement work;economic benefit;financial valuation;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.44, no.9, 2011³â, pp.765-776
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201129349656663)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿