|
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.44, no.12, 2011³â, pp.991-1000
|
ʼö¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â À¯·®-SS °ü°èÀÇ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼º
( Uncertainty of Discharge-SS Relationship Used for Turbid Flow Modeling ) |
Á¤¼¼¿õ;ÀÌÁ¤Çö;ÀÌÈï¼ö;¸Í½ÂÁø; ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°øÇаú;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇРȯ°æ°øÇаú;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇРȯ°æ°øÇаú;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸íȯ°æ´ëÇÐ Áö¿ª°Ç¼³°øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
Àú¼öÁö ʼö ¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡¼ ½ÇÃøÀÚ·á°¡ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì À¯ÀÔÇÏõ ºÎÀ¯»ç ³óµµ(SS) »êÁ¤À» À§ÇØ À¯·®(Q)°ú SS °ü°è½ÄÀÌ ÀÚÁÖ »ç¿ëµÈ´Ù. ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏõÀ» Åë°úÇÏ´Â SS ºÎÇÏÀ²Àº À¯·®¿¡ ÀÇÇØ º¯µ¿µÈ´Ù´Â °¡Á¤ ÇÏ¿¡ À¯·®°ú SSÀÇ ¸èÇÔ¼ö(SS=aQb) °ü°è°¡ °¡Àå ºó¹øÈ÷ Àû¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Q-SS °ü°è´Â ÃøÁ¤ ÁöÁ¡¿¡ µû¶ó ¹èŸÀû Ư¼ºÀ» °¡Áö¸ç, µ¿ÀÏ ÁöÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼µµ ¿¬Áß °èÀýÀû º¯µ¿¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ´õ¿íÀÌ, Q-SS °ü°è´Â µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ¼ö¹®°î¼±¿¡¼µµ À¯·® »ó½Â±â¿Í Çϰ±â¿¡ À̰ÝÇö»óÀ» º¸À̱⵵ ÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¿ë´ã´ï Àú¼öÁö¿Í ¼Ò¾ç°´ï Àú¼öÁö À¯ÀÔ ÇÏõ¿¡¼ °¿ì½Ã ¿¬¼Ó ½ÇÃøÇÑ ÀڷḦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î Q-SS °ü°èÀÇ À̰ÝÇö»óÀ» °íÂûÇϰí, SS ºÎÇÏÀ² »êÁ¤ ¿ÀÂ÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®Çϴµ¥ ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, Q-SS °ü°è´Â È«¼ö»ç»ó µ¿¾È ³ôÀº ºÐ»êµµ¿Í ½Ã°è¹æÇâÀÇ À̰ÝÇö»óÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, µ¿ÀÏÇÑ À¯·®¿¡ ´ëÇØ À¯·® »ó½Â±â°¡ Çϰ±âº¸´Ù SS ³óµµ°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À̰ÝÇö»óÀº Àú¼öÁö·Î À¯ÀÔÇÏ´Â SS ºÎÇÏ·® »êÁ¤¿¡ ÀÖ¾î À¯ÀÇÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ ¿ÀÂ÷·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Q-SS ¸èÇÔ¼ö´Â ½ÇÃø ºÎÇÏ·®À» °ú¼ÒÆò°¡ÇÏ´Â °á°ú¸¦ °¡Á®¿Ô´Ù. À̰ÍÀº Àú¼öÁö ʼö¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡¼ Áß¿äÇÏ°Ô °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÒ »çÇ×ÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â Q-SS °ü°è½ÄÀÇ ´ë¾ÈÀ¸·Î ʵµ-SS°ü°è°¡ Á¦½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. ʵµ-SS °ü°è´ÂQ-SS °ü°èº¸´Ù ºÐ»êµµ°¡ ÀÛ¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ½ÇÃø ºÎÇÏ·®°úÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ȹ±âÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÙ¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼ Àú¼öÁö·Î À¯ÀÔÇÏ´Â SS ºÎÇÏÀ²ÀÇ º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÑ »êÁ¤°ú ʼö¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ½Å·Úµµ¸¦ ³ôÀ̱â À§Çؼ´Â À¯ÀÔ Å¹µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Ç½Ã°£¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. |
|
The relationship between discharge (Q) and suspended sediment (SS) concentration often is used for the estimation of inflow SS concentration in reservoir turbidity modeling in the absence of actual measurements. The power function, SS=aQb, is the most commonly used empirical relation to determine the SS load assuming the SS flux is controlled by variations of discharge. However, Q-SS relation typically is site specific and can vary depending on the season of the year. In addition, the relation sometimes shows hysteresis during rising limb and falling limb for an event hydrograph. The objective of this study was to examine the hysteresis of Q-SS relationships through continuous field measurements during flood events at inflow rivers of Yongdam Reservoir and Soyang Reservoir, and to analyze its effect on the bias of SS load estimation. The results confirmed that Q-SS relations display a high degree of scatter and clock-wise hysteresis during flood events, and higher SS concentrations were observed during rising limb than falling limb at the same discharge. The hysteresis caused significant bias and underestimation of SS loading to the reservoirs when the power function is used, which is important consideration in turbidity modeling for the reservoirs. As an alternative of Q-SS relation, turbidity-SS relation is suggested. The turbidity-SS relations showed less variations and dramatically reduced the bias with observed SS loading. Therefore, a real-time monitoring of inflow turbidity is necessary to better estimate of SS influx to the reservoirs and enhance the reliability of reservoir turbidity modeling. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
À¯·®-SS °ü°è;À̰ÝÇö»ó;ʼö ¸ðµ¨¸µ; ʵµ-SS °ü°è;discharge-SS relation;hysteresis;turbidity flow modeling;turbidity-SS relation; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.44, no.12, 2011³â, pp.991-1000
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201105462034397)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|