¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ / v.45, no.1, 2012³â, pp.29-37
¿ï»ê½Ã ¼öµ¾¹° ¼öÁú°³¼±ÀÇ ÆíÀÍ ÃßÁ¤
( Measuring the Economic Benefits of the Tap Water Quality Improvement in Ulsan )
°û¼ÒÀ±;À¯½ÂÈÆ; Çѱ¹È¯°æÁ¤Ã¥.Æò°¡¿¬±¸¿ø;¼­¿ï°úÇбâ¼ú´ëÇб³ ¿¡³ÊÁöȯ°æ´ëÇпø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¿ï»êÁö¿ªÀÇ ¼öµ¾¹° ¼öÁú °³¼±¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀÇ ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç¾×À» µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ Á¶°ÇºÎ °¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤¹ý(CVM)À» Ȱ¿ëÇϵÇ, CVM ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ÁöÄѾßÇÏ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÁöħÀ» ¾ö°ÝÇÏ°Ô ÁؼöÇÏ¿© °¡±¸Á¶»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇϰí 1.5°æ°è ¾çºÐ¼±ÅÃÇü ½ºÆÄÀÌÅ© ¸ðÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ï»ê±¤¿ª½Ã 400°³ °¡±¸¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °¡±¸Á¶»ç¸¦½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´°í ÀÏ´ëÀÏ °³º°¸éÁ¢À» ÅëÇØ ¼öµ¾¹° ¼öÁú°³¼± ÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç±Ý¾×À» Áú¹®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÀ´äÀÚ Áß 71.5%°¡ ÁöºÒÇÒ Àǻ簡 ¾ø´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÑ °ÍÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§ ½ºÆÄÀÌÅ© ¸ðÇüÀÇ Àû¿ëÀº ÀûÀýÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ºÐ¼®°á°ú °¡±¸´ç ¿ù Æò±Õ 1,611¿øÀÇ ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç¾×À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç´Â ±³À° ¹× ¼Òµæ°ú °°Àº °¡±¸ Ư¼ºº¯¼ö¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ °ªÀ» ¿ï»ê±¤¿ª½Ã Àüü·Î È®ÀåÇϸé 2011³â 6¿ù ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¿¬°£ ¾à 83¾ï ¿ø¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ¼öµ¾¹° ¼öÁú°³¼±ÀÌ °æÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î Ÿ´ç¼ºÀ» °¡Áö´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÆÇ´ÜÀ» ÇÒ ¶§ ÆíÀÍÁ¤º¸·Î¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
This paper attempts to measure the economic benefits of tap water quality improvement using a specific case study of Ulsan, one of the large cities in Korea. To this end, we apply the contingent valuation (CV) method by employing a one-and-one-half bounded spike dichotomous choice question format. We surveyed a randomly selected sample of 400 households in Ulsan and asked respondents questions in person-toperson interviews about how they would willing to pay for the program. Respondents overall accepted the contingent market and were willing to contribute a significant amount (1,611 won), on average, per household per month. This willingness varies according to individual characteristics such as education level and income. The aggregate value of the program in Ulsan amounts to approximately 8 billion won per year.
 
Ű¿öµå
¿ï»ê;»ó¼öµµ ¼öÁú°³¼±;Á¶°ÇºÎ °¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤¹ý;Ulsan;tap water quailty improvement;contingent valuation method;
 
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.45, no.1, 2012³â, pp.29-37
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-6280
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201208040010022)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿